't. Mudhasani Ankaiah v. 1. State of Telangana

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to mutate the names of the respondents 5 to 9 for entire lands in survey No. 230 extent Ac 6.30 gts instead of Ac 2.10 gts situated at Chandravelli Village, Bellampalli Mandal, Mancherial District even though the petitioners raised objections through multiple representations/objectidns on 06.10.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.O9.2025 as arbitrary and illegal and in violation of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Bhu Bharathi Act 2025 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the representations/objections dated 06.1O.2025, 25.08.2025,

22.09.2025 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filecl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents/ to consider the representations objection dated 06. 1 0.202 5, 25.08.2025, 22.09.2025 Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 9: ---- The Court made the following: ORDER '1j::rilr . :. ,it. t, ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31349 of 2025 This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: *...pleased to issue writ order or direction more partiantarly one in the nature of uit of mandamus d.eclaing the action of the respondents in trying to mutate the names of the respondents 5 to 9 for entire lands in surueA No.230 extent Acs.6.30 gts instead of Acs'2'10 gts, situated at Chandrauelli Village, Bellampalli Mandal, Mancherial District euen though the petitioners raised obj ectio ns throug h multiple re pre s entations / obj e ctions on 06.10.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.09.2025 as arbitrary and iuegal and. in uiolation of the pinciples of natural justice and. contrary to tlrc prouisions of the Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to representations/ objections dated consider the 06. 10.2025, 25.08.2025, 22.O9.2025 and to pass"'"

2. Heard sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record. I ! I )

3. Since no adverse orders are being passed against respondent Nos.5 to 9, the notice to respondent Nos.5 to 9 is dispensed with.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the' petitioners would submit that one Kommari Rajaiah is the owner of the land to an extent of Acs.6.3O guntas in Sy.No.2:30, situated at Chandravelli Village, Bellampalli Mandal, Marecherial District and the ancestors of the petitioners are in possession of the subject lancis from the year 1955 onwards. In the year, 1955 the name of the father of petitioner No.1 is reflected in the revenue records and the same is continued for severa-l decades. Father of petitioner No.1, father of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and father of respondent Nos.S to 9 are in possession of the subject property and partitioned each to an extent of Acs.2.10 guntas and they are in possession of their respective shares. 5 Learned counsel further submitted that all of a sudden, l.he namT of the father of respondent Nos.S to 9 was {": reflected in the revenue records in possession column even Page 3 of4 though, the fathers of the petitioners are in possession and taking advantage of the sarne, respondent Nos.S to 9 in collusion with the revenue authorities are trying to mutate their narnes in the revenu.e records for the entire extent of Acs.6.30 guntas in Sy.No.230. The petitioners raised objections through representations dated 06.10.2025,

25.08.2025 and 22.09 .2025 to respondent Nos.2 to 4. Despite receiving the said' representations, respondent Nos.2 to 4 did not act upon the same and are trying to mutate the narnes of respondent Nos.S to 9 in the revenue records for the land to an extent of Acs.6.30 guntas in Sy.No.230. Hence, the present writ petition. : A I t I I I I I

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions would submit that the representations made by the petitioners said to have been sent through registered post, if received, shall be examined by issuing notice to the concerned parties and necessarJr orders will be passed.

7. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the i I -4 respondent-authorities to consider the representations dated

06.L0.2025,25.O8.2O25 and 22.09.2025, and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with la.vr', by putting the petitioners, respondent Nos.S to 9 on notice, since the original landlord has not been made party to this writ petition. The respondent-authorities are alsc, directed to issue notice to the original landlord and affording them an opportunity of hearing. If, respondent-authorr.ties are not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioners, they shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order, communical-e a copy of the said order to the petitioners and complete thr: said exercise within a period of two (o2) months from the da1.e of receipt of a copy of this order. There sha-ll be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if arty, pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 //TRUE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. Principal Secretary, Revenue Department secretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Mancherial District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial District. 4. The Tahasildar, Bellampalli [Vlandal,Mancherial District. 5. One CC to SRl. GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana. \

7. Two CD Copies \ PVL BS 9 HIGH COURT r' DATED;1511012025 \ I t ORDER I.qsHE1 ( WP.No.31349 of 2025 (, 21il0u m z * t- I ;i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \o \( t