The High Court · 2025

Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the O, mpron1.." petition in vi-ew- of the compromise between the parties in connection ,^ th the c c. No. 269g of 2025 pending on the fire of_XV Additionar chief judiciar r4 lgistrate, uyoerabao, for the offences u/sec 85, 351(2) BNS, sec 4 of M'wo Ac't : o-.r9 in the interest oi .lustice; I.A. NO: 4 OF 202s Petition under section 3s9(2) r/w 528 of BNSS. 20:,r praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of ;riminar High court may be pleased to RECoRD the petitioner to compromise for quashing the criminar case against Respondent No. 2 to 4 r erein and quash the pl1^""d.in^S^.-SSainst the respondents No. 2 to 4/ accused \ ). j to S in C C No. 3.69.8 qf 2025 pending on the file of XV Additionat Cht: judiciar f,rf rgirtrri", Hyderabad; "petition, This Petition comino on for hearing,upon perusing he Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hlaring 'in"- ,rg. , rents of sri KHAJA ARAJUDDIN, Advocate for the petitioners and s, Jithirc er Rao veeramaiia' Addl. Public Prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No. r r nd Sri MoHAMIvTAD OBAID MOHIUDDIN, Advocate appear for the'Respondent I,, ( .2, The Court made the following: ORDER * I THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.1335 2 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.2698 of 2025 on the file of the learned XV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 85, 351(2) of BNS, Section 4 of MWO Act, 2019.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 has been filed by respondent No.2 to record compromise between them .

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition.

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrUe orders dated 15.10.2025 \ 2 L'I'D. J i A-Nos.3 & 4 ot 2025 tn/and Ctt1.No.1.1352 ot 2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Cou 1 Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a re l )rt to that effect

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued b,this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have apprr ared bef<lre the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State ,r Telangarra and the Secretary of the above said Authority identifierl the parties and submitted a report dated 25.10.2025 stating that ll e pa(ies were identified and they have willfully, without any coerci ,n, entered into compromrse.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2(t',5 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and t 1e proceedings in C.C.No.269B of 2025 on the file of the learned X'V , rdditional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioners/accused are hereby quashed sul ject to the petitioners/accused are paying an amount of Rs.li C00l (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court -egal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, I lyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the t irector, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings tuc.No.52188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:SBIN( 120070, MICR :.// \ I I i ; a i ! l : i i i I I 3 t:l'D J l-A. Nos-3 & 4 of 2025 hJend Cdp.No.13352 ol202s No.500004057), within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 . Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' SD/- N SRIHARI EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

1. The i. O"" CC to SRI KHAJA ARAJUDDIN Advocate [OPUC] 3 6;; aa io Snr rt'rOHnr"rMrno oenro MoHIUDDIN.'.Advocate [OPUC] ; iil;;6.tnuelic iRosEcuron uisn court at Hvderabad (our) 5. Two CD CoPies -' iliio"o*ittt', copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) ivio"-usn.ruo.t 35739/2025 amount paid) VSNVPSL W HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 e o.J f 0 r iAt, ?!:r * { t.: tAl,:.\V:-../, ! ii ,l / ORDER IA.NOS.3&40F2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.13352 of 2025 ALLOWING THE IA.NOS.3 & 4 OF 2025 I rND THE CRIMINAL PETITION {/ o {a:$-." i{tiii.qq.&; /1 //211 I I I 2 SMT HABEEBA FAROOK @ HABEEBA FAROOK HYDE& Wo. Shaik Hyder, Age; 43 Years, Occ: House wife, Rlo. l6-1-24/E/10 AND 11 Ftar No. 602, Grace Gory Apartment, 6th floor, Saidabad, Farha Colony, Hyderabad. ... Respondent/Delacto-Compl ainant/ l2/ I MEMORAN DUM OF JOINT COMPROMI E MEMO FILED BY THE PARTIES

1. It is submitted that, this quash petition is fired praying this Hon,bre court to quash the c.c No. 2698 of 2025 against the petitioners / A-1 to A-3 pending on the file of Hon'ble XV Additional chief Judicial lvragiskate, Hyderabad in which petitioners names are shown as accused No. 1 ,2 & 3, First petitioner and respondent No.2 were married on 11.11-2022 at Hyderabad, in accordance with Musrim Rights and Customs. The marriage was an arranged marriage and the marriage was consummated and blessed with one baby boy from this existing marriage. 2, whereas after the marriage, due to some m is-understa nding disputes arose between the petitioner No.1/ A-1 and Respondent No. 2 herein and now both the parties are Iiving together.

3.) The respondent No.2 has fired a criminar compraint bearing F.i.R. No.273 of 2024 dated: 13.12.2024, the said FIR is registered for the offences punishable under section. U/sec 85, 351(2) BNS, sec 4 0f MWo Act 201g, and after completing investigation charge sheet was filed against all the petitioners/A-1 to A-3 herein and numbered as c.c No. 2698 of 2o2s and cognizance was taken for the offence punishable U/sec 85, 351(2) BNS, Sec 4 of MWO Act 2019, by the Hon,bte XV Additional chief judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad against the petitioners/A-1 to A-3. I I i l, t ! I i i i I ,i { I ,1 1 i i i 'ii l: il.i I ;t iL //3t/ 4. That the petitioners submit that as the disputes that arcs I between the petitioners and lhe respondent No. 2 is resolved, respondent No.2 d'r rsn't want to continue the crirninal proceedings as such the present quash petiti,r is filed by the parties praying this Hon'ble court to quash the C.C No. 2698 of 2( 25 pcnding on 7 i i i the flle of Hon'ble XV Additional Chief judlcial Magistrate, Hyderabacl It is submitted that, in view of the above submissions this lJor 'ble Court may be pleased to quash the C.C No. 2698 of 2O25 pending on the fllr of Hon'ble XV Additional Chief judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad and to pass sucl- rther ordr:r or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the inter€s of justicer, for which the respondent No.2 has no objectiori. II i I i ; ! I i I ! E! t I I i I 1 i I I Date: 10.10.2025 Place: Hyderabad Coun for the petitioners Cou n Respondent No.2 \ * \. E, Peti-i ner No.1 ,/A- i Petrt )ner No,2 /A-2 \ .-- \*\vl.- TY Peti: )ner No.3 /A-3 Rrrs rondent No.2/ Defac o complainant