The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 'l to 4 in considering the Representations Dated. 09.1o.2025 for the purpose of stay/not to entertain any property transactions over the 1) Land in Sy. No. 12ilA2/2 an extent of Ac. 2-00 Gts situated at Medakpally Viltage, Thalakondapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, 2) Plot bearing No.60 East part in Sy No.1470 an extent of .163 Sq. Yards situated at Amangal Village, Ranga Reddy District based on the ex-pa(e judgment and decree in o.s. No. 69 of 2025 on the file of Honourable Junior civil Judge, at Amangal, as the suit has been filed for reopening and is curren y sub- judice, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 , and 3004 of constitution of India and also violation of principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents No. 1 to 4 to conside' Dated. 09/1012025 ol the Petitioner and not to enl( transactrons over the 1) Land in Sy. No. 1251A212 an e>l situated at lvledakpally Village, Thalakondapally Mandal, Fl 2) Plot bearing No. 60 East Part in Sy No. 1470 an extr: situated at Amangal Village. Ranga Reddy District bar; judgment and decree in O.S. No. 69 of 2025 on the file of H; Judge, at Amangal as the suit has been filed for reopening judice the Representations rtain any property :nt of Ac. 2-00 Gts rnga Reddy District, rt of 163 Sq Yards ,d on the ex-parte roura ble J unio r Civll rnd is currently sub- lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou,1 Respondents No.2 to 4 to consider the Representations - the Petitioner and not to entertain any property transactions Sy. No. 1251A212 an extent of Ac. 2-00 Gts situated at Thalakondapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, 2) Plot bear in Sy No. 147O an extent of 163 Sq. Yards situated at Ame Reddy District based on the ex-parte judgment and decrer, 2025 on the file of Hon'ble Junior Civil Judge, at Amangal, i filed forieopening and is currently sub-judice, pending dispo petition rcu mstances stated may be pleased to ated.09.'1 0.2025 of over the 1) Land in Vedakpally Village, rg No. 60 East Part lgal Village, Ranga in O.S. No 69 of s the suit has been ;al of the above writ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. GURRAM VENKAT RAMAN/ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: SRI L. RAVINDER, A iP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&4: GP FOR STAMPS AND REC ISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.31 228 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petirion is filed assailing the inaction o[ respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in considering the representation dated 09.10.2025, rvherein the petitioner requested to stay and not to entertain any property transactions in respect of the land in S1.. No. 125/A212, to an extent of Ac. 2.O0 guntas, situated at Medakpally Village, Talakondapally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and plot No. 60 (East part) in Sy. No. 1470, to an extent of 163 sq. yards, situated at Amangal Village, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as the 'subject property'), based on the ex parte judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 69 of 2025 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Amangal.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner ald Sri L. Ravinder, learned Assistalt Government pleader for Revenue. .) The daughter of the petitioner, narnely pole Rajitha, 1S married to the Sth respondent herein. The petitioner I 2 claims that she purchased the subject name of her daughter, pole Rajitha, and her r entered in the revenue records. Since the dat, the petltioner has been rn cor-rtinuous enJoyment of the property without prr perty in the L Lrne lr.as duly : of purchase, po _. ;ession ald any lnterr uption from any third party. ,J

4. It rs lurther submitted that a false ca;: has been foisted agarnst the petitioner,s daughter, resrr [ing in the registration of Crime No. j 77 of 2024 b1, th<: Ameenpur Police Station, arrd she rs presently in judic; i I custody. Taking advanf2gs of her incarceration, the Sth r1 while suppressing the fact that the petitioner,s i rn judicial custody, filed a suit in O. S. No. 6 < of 2O2S seeking a declaration that he is the owner of tt e subject propert5r, and ex - parte declr e dated rughter is spondent, obtained

12.o9.2025.

5. The Sth respondent thereafter submitted he said judgment and decree before respondent Nos. ll and, 4 seeking mutation of his name in the revenue 'ecords. Aggrieved by the said ex Parte judgment and de: .ee, I I 3 petitioner has filed i.A. SR No. 2856 of 2025 dated

07.10.2025, seeking to set aside the same. The said application IS presently pending adjudication before the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Amangal

6. Meanwhile, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 09.1O.2025, requesting the authorities not to entertain any transactions in respect of the subject property. Despite receipt and acknowledgment of the said representation, respondent No. 4 has not taken any action Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondent No. 4, the petitioner has fi1ed the present writ petition

7. Whereas Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would ) \ submit that the 4th respondent will consider the application if it is filed through online as per the provisions of the Bhu Bharati Act,2025, strictly in accordarce with law t { B 1S In the light of the said submission, this Writ Petition disposed of directing the petitioner to submit online application as per the provisions of the Bhu Bharati Act, I i I i l I To, I 4 2O25. On such filing, the 4*, respondent r directed to consider the online application submitted b-v I he petitioner strictly in accordance u,ith law, by putting r re petitioner and all other interested parties on notice ar d afford an opportunity of hearing. He shall complete the ;aid exercise as per the time fixed under the provisions of lhu Bharati Act,2025. There shall be no order as to costs. As : sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Vrit petition shall stald closed SD/ ]. PONNA KRISHNA ASI; STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// l i \' \ \ SECTION OFFICER Reddy District. '1 . The Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, TS Sec -etariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy Diatrict. 3. The Tahsildar -cum- Joint Sub Registrar, Thalakondapalr I Mandal, Ranga 4. The Sub Registrar, lMaheshwaram, Ranqa Reddv Distrir; 5. One CC to SRl. GURRAIV_VENXAT RAMANA, Advocat , [OpUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the Stir e'of Telangana at 7. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGtSTRAT|ON, {igh Court for the 8. Two CD Copies State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Hyderabad [OUT] I BM PVL HIGH COURT DATED:1511012025 ORDER WP.No.31228 ot 2025 I(t' ( HES o C) ( l. H 5 * r--^-o.:: iATCt ,.}.. 1i la: .}-: q t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \aL Ir ^4