l\/irza Humayun Ali Baig v. The State of Teiangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of fir'landamus pleased wherein declaring the action of respondenls for not mutating the name of Petitioner including issuance of Digital Pass Book as per Bhu Bharati Act 2025 in pursuance of Judgment and Decree and suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession in O.S- No.285 of 1979 on the file of l/unsif [\/agistrate Court, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District and also executing EP proceedings vide E.P No..1 B of 1998, inspite of making several applications and recent one of 21-05-2025 and 01-08-2025 in respect of land in Survey No. 437 admeasuring 1-38 gts. situated at Turkaguda village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy- District and consequently declare the action of Respondents. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15,l CpC praying that in the c in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor_ r direct the Respondents to mutate the name of petitioner r Digital Pass Book as per Bhu Bharati Act 2025 in pursuan; Decree and suit for Declaration and Recovery of possessit 1979 on the file of Munsif Magistrate Court, lbrahimpa r District and also executrng EP proceedings vide E.p No.1t making several applications and recent one of 21-05-202j respect of land in Survey No. 437 admeasuring .1-3g gts. s I village, Kandukur lVlandal, Ranga Reddy District pending j writ petition. rcumstances stated may be pleased to :lud ing issuance of r of Judgement and r in O S. No.285 of am, Ranga Reddy of 1998, inspite of and 01-08-2025 in lated at Turkaguda sposal of the main Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGp FOR IIEVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL IVRIT PETITION No.31538 of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "-..to pass order or orders more particularly one in ttre nature of Writ of Mandamus pleased wherein declaring the action of respondents for not mutating the name of PetiLioner including issuance of Digital Pass Book as per Bhu Bharati Act,2025 it pursuance of Judgment and Decree and suit for Declaration and Recovery of Possession in O.S. No.285 of 1979 on the file of Munsif Magistrate Court, lbrahimpatnarn, Ra-nga Reddy District ald also executing EP proceedings vide E.P. No.18 of 1998 inspite of making several applications and recent one of 21.05.2025 and 01.O8.2025 in respect of land in Survey No.437, admeasuring 138 gts, situated at Turkaguda village, Kandukur Marrdal, Ranga Reddy District ald consequently declare the action of Respondents as illegal, arbitrary, ultra vires and violation of principles of natural justice... "

2. Heard Mr.Suresh Shiv Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner hled an online application as per the relevant provision of the Talangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short "the Act, 2025") uide transaction ID No.30T167500006639, dated 20.06.2025. Since no action has been taken by the ofhcial respondents, this writ petition has -I 2 been filed. He would further submit that the : : titioner is the decree holder in OS No.285 of 1979, passecl r,y the District Munsiff at Ibrahimpatna, Ralga Reddy District rn 30.O7.1986 and accordingllr E.P proceedings have been de petitioner is put to possession by the learn: :ided ald the I trial Court. Thereafter, the name of the petitioner has been I rutated in the revenue records in Sy.No.362, in compliance to the decree passed by the learned trial Court in O.S. No.2B5 r f 1979 and so far as Sy.No.437 situated at Turkaguda Villagt: I/o. Rachuiur village has not been mutated. Despite the p t titioner made applications from 18.06.20O4, no action has beer made by the respondent authorities. Then, recently other ap1 hcation dated

20.06.2025 has been filed by the petitioner. Sinc: no action has been taken by the official respondents, this writ p seeking to pass appropriate direction to tlr :tition is filed : respondent authorities.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Goverr ment pleader for Revenue would submit that the case of the p. itioner would be considered by the official respondents by issrL ng necessary notices to all concerned parties ald to pass approFt iate orders. 3

5. Having heard iearned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on perusal of materials placed, ttris Court is of the view that under relevant provision of ROR Act, 90 days time limitation has been prescribed to intimate the Tahsildar for execution of decree, Further, Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963 wiil also have the role in deciding the matter irrespective of the said provisions. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the officia-l respondents to cause enquiry into the matter by issuing necessary notices to all the concerned parties and by granting sufficient opportunity of hearing, decide the matter in terms of Limitation and merits, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stard closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. PRATHIMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To. '"'t. Th" Principal Secretary, Revenue.Department State of Telangana' Telanoana Secretariat Secretariat Hyderaoao z. i[JC'ort""tor, Ibrahimpatnam Ranga.Reddy District' 5. iii; R;;;;G'oiuision5ioiricei, kgioykyr, At Kandukur Ransa Reddy District a. fn" fintitOar, Kandukur tvlandal Kandukur' 5 d; bti;-SRl SunesH sHlv sAcARAdvocate [oPUC] - - . 6. i;; CCs to-CplOn nfVeruUe, High Court for the State of Telangana al 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] DAN I HIGH COURT DATED:16t10t2025 ORDER WP.No.31538 of 2O2S : 5 irrj .,fif \ r\'/\\ ..: \ .:' i: .,i .,1 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS f nlu-