The High Court · 2025

1. Dumpala Annapurna, V/o. Late D. Sriramulu, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No.8-2-26911917 42, Road No.2, lnd r r Nagar, Banlara Hills, Khairatabad Hyderabad -500034 ...RespondenUAccused Person in I /..Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, I ligh Court at Hyderabad ...RespondenURespondent in l.l\ Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying tha: in the circumstances stated in the lt/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, t re High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/defacto complainant to r;r mpound the offence Registered against the Rqspondents/Accused Person in FIF tlo.455 of 2024 under sections 318(4), 336(3) ,340(2), 329,351(3) R/w 3(5) of El SS Act, before P S Allapur, Cyberabad on the file of the I Additional Junicr Civil Judge-Cum-Xll Additional l/letropolrtan lvlagistrate It/edchal-Malkajgiri Distr:t at Kukatpally, and pass such other orders and order as this Hon'ble court may, eem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying tha: in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, t re High Court may be 11-11-2O24 as per pleased to record the compromise in FIR No.455 of 2024 dzn Itlemorandum of Understanding-Cum-Settlement Agreemert executed in between the Petitioner and Respondent No.1, and pass such other cr ler or order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumri ances of the case. =d This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusin! the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.PRASHANT, Advocate for the Petitioner and th( Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the : espondent No.'1 , and of Sri B. Santosh Singh, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.13937 ol2O25 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') seeking to quash the proceedings against her in Crime No.455 of 2024 on the file of the Allapur Police Station, Cyberabad District, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 340(2),329, 351(3) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.3 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound lhe offences

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions

4. Perused the affidavits filed by lhe de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter 2 LID.J t-rlp i3937 242,: into compromise, they were given a chance to sett r the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before' the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telang r ta vlde orders dated 28.10.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretr rry, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the partie s and submit a report to that effect 5 Pursuant to the above said direction issued b / this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appe lred before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State o' felangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified i re parties and submitted a report dated '10.11 2025 stating that tr : parties were identified and they have willfully and without any c: ercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 202 i are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and rl e proceedings in Crime No.455 of 2024 on the file of the Allapur rolice Station, Cyberabad District, registered against the petitic r erlaccused is hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accuserl is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Hig r Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five ,/ I I i l l i t i I i I i I i { :j ! I I t t l ) ., Crlp 1393t 2A2i I, I r i l Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry

7. lvliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR A- SECTION OFFICER To, W '1. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-& Xll Additional Metropolrtan Magistrate Medchal-Malkajgiri District at Kukatpally. 2 The Station House Officer, Allapur Police Station, Cyberabad, 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI P.PRASHANT Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to SRI B SANTOSH SINGH, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with copy of Joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs.'10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Mis- Paleys, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 18.11.2025 as Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, at Hyderabad, Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association High Curt Buildings Hyderabad, and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 1 33696 of 2025. NVts/Sa HIGH COURT DATED:1811112025 : i i ! 1 : I I t I i t i . COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.13937 of 2025 a\ <i J() r t i t \: ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION I.ND I.A.NOS.2 AND 3 OF 2025 q I ?\ q \1i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE Otr'TELANTANA l Between: AT HYDERABAD Crl.P.No. of 2025

1. A.Prem Raj (Died per LRs). ... Defacto Complainant.

2. KAVITHA, W/o. Late A. Prem Raj, D/o. Kuppiiy Raj Kumar, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Flat No.4O3, Vanila Malsion, LIC Colony, Boosareddy Guda, West Marredpally, Secunderabad - 5OOO26 .. Petitioner/ (Wife of Defacto Complainant) AND

1. DUMPALA ANNAPURNA, W/o. Late D. Sriramulu, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No.8-2-269 I 19 1742, Road No.2, Indira Nagar, Banjara Hills, Khairatabad, Hyderabad - 500034. ... Respondent/Accused Person.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, ^High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. I . ,./ l ... Respondent/Respondept JOINT MEMO It is submitted that on the intervention of the well wishers friends and relatives the disputes tretween them were amicably sorted out. The petitioner is not intending to prosecute the I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I ! ! i t I N t i I I t ! I I i i i I I i I criminal case registered against the Accusecl Person for ' the n betterment of their relationship. Accordingly, the ;l :titioner agreed not to prosecute the criminal case registered I gainsl Accused person. The crirninai proceedings in FIR No.455 t1 2024 of Allapur police Station, cyberabad District may be quash: I in the interest ofjustice. It is submitted that the Petitioner have ami' :ab1y settled the dispute at the intervention of elders and r,vell u,ir; rers and friends the matter has been compromised between the;rL and accordingly entered into Memorar-rdum of Understanding - o lm - Settlement Agreement. Hence, both parties came to compro I .lse in ttre above Crl. P. against FIR No.455 of 2024 of Allaptr Police Station, cyberabad. District and both the parties have n,r claims or rights against each other in future. trtloner € s^y) Counsel for Petitioner ) l.r cused Person r P son. 1i :c