Retd. Employee, Previously v. Agriculture
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 14 Nov 2025
- Bench
- PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL, PRINCIPAL
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
l6.Pothuganti Suresh, S/o. P. Sriramulu, Aged aboul42 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H No.1-89, 17 Pothuganti Anuradha, D/o. P. Sriramulu, Aged about 30 yr:ars, Occ. Student, R/o. H No 1-89
18. Pothuganti Jyothi, D/o. P Sriramulu, Aged about 30 yea -s. Occ Student. R/o. H.No. 1-89,
19. Pothuganti Shankaraiah, S/o. Late P. Sayanna, Aged abo-rt 60 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No.'1 -89.
20. Pothuganti Mahender, S/o. P. Shankaraiah, Aged about 3:f years, Occ Agrrculture, R/o. H.No.1 -89
21. Pothuganti Ramesh, Sio. P. Shankaraiah, Aged about 3:] years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1-89, 22 Pothuganti Ashok, S/o. P. Shankaraiah, Aged about 27 1'ears, Occ. Student - Minor. R/o H.No.1-89.
23. Pothuganti Naresh, S/o. P Shankaraiah, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Student - Minor, R/o H.No.1-89,
24. Pothuganti Krishna, S/o. Late P. Sayanna, Aged about 6J years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1 -89,
25. Pothuganti Sravan, S/o. P. Krishna, Aged dbout 35 years,, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No 1-89,
26. Pothuganti Swapna, D/o. P. Krishna. Aged about 26 yeais Occ. Student, R/o. H.No 1-89, I
27. Pothuganti Chitti, D/o. P. Krishna, Aged about 23 years, cc. Student, R/o. H.No.1-89, Respondent Nos.1 to 27 are lhe residents of Sathamrai Vrllage, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
28. Gunti Yadaiah, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H No.1 3-1 1 , Shidhanti Village. Shamshabad tr/andal, Ranga Reddy District.
29. Pothuganti Chandramma, Wo. Late Pothuganti Venkataiah, Aged about B0 years, Occ- Household, R/o. H.No.1-86i 1, Sathamrai Villaee, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District
30. Pothuganti Manemma, Wio. Late Pothuganti Narasimhulu, Aged about 80 years, Occ. Household, R/o. H.No.1-66, Sathamrai Village, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District.
31. Pothuganti Renamma, Wo. Pothuganti Yadaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rio. H.No.2-38, Sathamrai Village, Shamshabad, Rahga Reddy District.
32. Labhkunwar B. Lotia, Wo. Bhagwanji, Aged Major, Occ. Househotd, C/o. Jawahar Metal Works, R/o. H.No.'l-1-538, Bakaram, Hyderabad.
33. Sheela N. Lotia, Wo. Navnit, Aged Major, Occ. Household, R/o. H.No.5-3- '101, Rao Mahal, Jeera, Secunderabad. 34 B Sudhakar Re-ddy, S/o B Linga Reddy, Aged about 66 years, Occ. Lawyer, R/o. HIG Block 3, Flat - 8, Bagh Lingampally, Hyderabad - 44. ...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the GPA Holder Hemanth Kumar Kaukuntla to represent on behalf of petitioners 1 and 2 in the interest of justice, and pass . Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER / THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHAI"I'ACHARYA CTVIL REVISION PETITTON NO.3749 CIF 2025 Mr..lalh Kanakaiah, lcarned Senior Counsel representing Mr.Narrntlar Jalli, learned counscl appearing foI rhc p( ritloner.
ORDER:
The onlr prayer of the revision petition, rrs, q,ho are the defendants in a Suir uide o.s.No. 197 of 2025 (ok No.700 of 20 10) f-rled by thc res po nden ts / plain tiffs for cancellation ol sale deeds ol the year 198 I and I 982 respectivcly, is that for tht: k:arned Principal Senior Civil Judgc Cum Principal Assistant Sessir ns Judge, Ranga Reddy District at RiUcndranagar (Trial CourtJ to cx re ditr: the hearing of the Suit.
Learned Senior Counsel appeirring for the' petitroners/dekrnrlants places clocketed orders o[ te,: Trial Court at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District fronr 13.O8.2024 to
30.o8.2025.
Learncd Scnior Counsel submits that the -Suit has onlr. l>ee n adjourned for rhc last frfteen years. It is also subnritted tl'rat Lhc Suit was transferred to thc present Trial Court at Rajendranagar in 2024.
Consi<iering thc fact thal the Suit u,as filt:r] in 2OlO atrd r,r,a s onll' transferred to the present Trial Court at Rajenc rilnagar in 2024, ( I )a 2 this Court does not find any reason to pass an urgent direction on the Trial Court as it is evident from the docket orders that the Suit itself was renumbered in 2025.
CRP.No.3749 of 2025, along with all connected applications, is.disposed of with a request to the Trial Court to expedite the hearing of the Suit and make its best efforts to dispose of the Suit, taking into consideration of the fact that the Suit has been pending for the last fifteen years. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII SD/- P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT RECTSTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal S-enior Civil Judge-cum-Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy Dgtrict.
2. One CC to SRl. NARENDAR JALLI Advocate IOPUCI 3. Two CD Copies pk/PSL I I HIGH COURT DATED:1411112025 I I i 2':-: s 1"4 f5 + z a .L 2 6 r{0lJ 2ttr a t) EsPATctlgO t /,, t :r: /Jj'e ir o ,, .1" \,',9.\.n. \ CRP.No.3749 of 2025 DISPOSED OFF |..... \p^ 2b t\
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 14 Nov 2025. The bench was PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL, PRINCIPAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.