✦ High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,009 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction one more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus a) Directing the Respondents herein to seize all the cattle including cows, calfs, bulls, bullocks, buffaloes, camels etc. which have been illegally transported to Greater Hyderabad and in other parts of the state of Telangana and are being sold in the open sale market witho t proper permissions and certificates including from a veterinary doctor. b) Directir I the Respondents to immediately take necessary actions against illegal slaughtr'r rrg houses operating in the state of relangana without necessary licenses anc :ermissions and are involved in the exercise of slaughtering animals being sold ir the open markets. c) Directing the respondents to immediately respond and take action on the complaints made by the volunteers of the Animal welfe -r: organizations. d) Declare the actions of Respondents in permitting and conse truenfly making open statements that slaughter of bulls is permitted as il e:gal, unlawful and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith take rctions to curb the slaughtering of bulls in the State of Telangana. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section I5i cpc praying that in the c r )rimstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court m a r be pleased to issue interim directions directing the Respondents herein to consiri r the Representation of the Petitioners dated 13-08-20'18 and 14-08-2018 therebl seizing all the cattle including cows, calfs. bulls, bullocks, buffaloes, camels e:. which have been illegally transported to Greater Hyderabad and in other larts of the state of Telangana and are being sold in the open sale market withor I pr6pg1 permissions and certifrcates including from a veterinary doctor, pendir ( the disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt K.SAI CHARAN FOR SRt ,! ARESH REDDy CHINNOLLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 17: SRI D.PRADEEI, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.1g: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TTJKARAI'IJI WRIT PETITION No.29485 OF 2018 ORDER: 'l tris \\ rit Pcdrion is filcd unclcr Articlc 226 of (.ot-tsttf Ltt'itttt of India sccking thc icrllorvins rclieF/s: ". .to is;rrc anr apptopriate rvrit, orcler or dirccuou i)Llc trl()rc plrrtcuhtlr olc tr thc neture of \\'rit of Nlanclatrus a) l)irccriirq rhc Rcspond,rnts hcrein tti scizc all rh.-- catdc inclrchng corvs, calfs. lr'.rilr, Irtr[oclis, Luffalocs. camcls crc. rvhich har-c bcen illcgallv triro:i)() l(ri t() ( ircrk. Hrdcrabad trrd jrl otlrci plrts o[ thc si2lc ,)f'l .:.Llrr'.r'r ' ancl arc lreirrg solcl tn thc open salc rnarkcr lritilrur ploircr p(fll]rssl(,1r.r lnd c,cr[ficates incl-rding from a r-ctcrinetf docl i lr, [)irrcrinc tlrc Rcsponclcnts to inmccliatclv telic ntcesstttt r,.cilttri: rtarrst rllegal slarrghrcrins houscs operatirg h tlrc strte ol 'i'ti:irt'.xc.1r u'rthout .rccessan, [ccnscs and permissions lnd arc ioroh-cr] in rhc cxcrcisc .,[ slaughtcri,rg anin-rals bc.inq sold in thc ()Pen Irrxrl'ci], it-l [)r:,:crinq rhc rcspo,rdcnrs to imrncdiatch rcsponcl ar'.ci takc atitr,tr ort thc com:rlaints marle br the \:oluflteers of thc \nimai \\ cii:Lrc ()rqanizarions- d) I)cclarc thc actions of ltcspondcnts irr pcii,ri:,i,,: anrl consc<1ucnth makirrq opetr statcmcrlts that ri:ruqhicl. r',[ i'irli. ;,, p(:rn)lttc.l as . illegal, unlarvful and conscqr-(:nllt' ,-lircct rllc Il('spondcnts io irrrth\.irh takc actiotl-. to curb thc shuglllrrirL.' , t brrlls in tlrt Sfi,rc of '[ clirnglLlra a,rd pass......."

2. Fi,:ald \|L.l...Sai (lharan, icarrtcd ct.,,-t; tsil irr I -\i-'rri.')= Nlr.Narcsh licddr, (-hianolla, lcarnecl c()unscl ftrr thc p(rtj'i, )1iil"i ancl l.1r.l).I)r'aclccp. lcamcd,\ssistatrt (lovcrnmcr;t i'ic:iclrr i,,r Hon-rc, appcaring f<rr rcsl-ronclcnt Nr-,s.1 tc-, 17

3. Lcarnc<l c()unsel i<rr thc pcririoners sulJirits that thr .:ilrric i )f action in thc prescrrt writ PCtltl()o 1f() iotqcL sul-'' tr <rs t, rr 2 arlitrlicrtion ancl, thcrclrrre, sc..-'ks clisrnissal oF the ,r ;15 prtitir rn rs iriliirc,iillrs .1. Ilccordinq rhc subn'rissions of borh lcarncd c() lnscl, thc r,vrit 1-rcririon is cltsr-r-rissecl as infrr:ctuous. 'l'hcrc shall bc r o otder as to C()irtS \[iscr:]laricoLrs Petitiorrs, ircncling if any, shall su od closed SD/ A.SRINIVAS REDDY tr ) ?TANT REGISTRAR \=- t ci) 3 loPUCl cf T elangana, at ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// \ To '1 . One CC to SRI NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA, A(vo 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOtvlE, High Court for the Stf, 3. Two CD Copies Hyderabad. [OUT] i \ PSK Pru, HIGH COURT DATED:2611112025 ORDER WP.No.29485 of 2018 -.1 |i:,ia' ,.) ,) -) :i:i+ \, l FiL 5i .1.. sFnt DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS l^C, ,.1\"\'l'

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments