The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminir petition, the High C;;rt ;ry be- pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitionei/Accused in c.c No 1330/2020 pending on the fire oi il RJditionar Junior civir Juoge c;_rr Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2O25: Between: Smt..Radhika @_Yerala Hepsiba, Wo.A.N.Dinakar, Aqed 38 years, Occ. private Employee. R/o.Frat No.s0i, Kanakadhara t-anamiir Epartm<lnts, eehino sak;i Towers, Kapra, ECIL, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Defacto-complainant AND niifrJionaa, n"p Hyderabad.

1. The State of Telangana and another, Through S H'O' P S Kushaiguda' -ov ts prntic irosecutor,-High court at Hyderabad' " ' RespondenURespondent 2. Annavanchala Radhakrishna S/o Late' Satyanarayana' Aged 60 years' Occ Pvt. Employee, nlo FiIi"N"lirs Ki"k'Jl]i'ta Lan'dmark Apartments' Behind bii"t i,i*d*, Raia Rajeswari Nagar, Kapra' ECIL' Hyderabad ...RespondenUQuash Petitioner/Accused - Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay pL"."O to permit compound the offences ..and to record the same in 6" C.C.No.l330of2O2opendingonthefileofllAdditiona|JuniorCivilJudgeCum ll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri' l.A. NO: 20F 2025 PetitionunderSection35g(2)ofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGrou,ndsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay quash the Criminal Proceedings in C C.No 1330 of 2020 pending ;;;;r;J1" onthefileofllAdditionalJuniorCivilJudgecum-llAdditionalMetropolitan rvirgi.itri" at Malkajgiri by recording the compromise to secure the ends of J ustice. This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SriC.HariPreeth,AdvocateforthePetitionerandttlr.ChallaSrinivasaReddy, learned counsel for Respondent No.2/de-facto complainant, and none appeared for the respondent no.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO I.A.Nos.1 and2 of2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.10 l7l of2022 COMMON OR.DER: This criminar petition has been filed under section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 (for short, ,Cr.p.C.,) by the petitioner/accused, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 1330 of 2020 on rhe file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge_cum_I[ Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri, for the offences punishable uncler sections 354-D and 504 of the Indian penal Code,

2. During the pendency of this criminal petition, at the intervention of well-wishers and elderS, petitioner/accused and respondent No.2/de-facto complainant have entered into compromise to resolve the disputes pending between them and filed joint affidavit along with I.A.No.2 of 2025 and also filed another l.A.No.1 of 2025 to record the compromise and to compound the offences. 2 J The above said applications came up lor consideration before this Court on 10.09.2025, and this Court directed the petitioner/accused and respondent No'2/de-facto complainant'' to appear before this Court on 17 09 2025'

4. Mr.C.Hari Preeth, leamecl counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No'2' identified their respective parlies' Pursuant to the order dated

10.09.2025, the parties were physicaliy presented before this Court along with their original Aadhar Cards' Respondent No'2/de-facto complainant informed the Court that she has no objection to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.ll30 o12020 against the petitioner'

5. Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances including joint memo filed by both the parties' proceedings in C.C.No.1330 of 2O2O on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Il Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri' against the petitioner/accused are liable to be quashed'

6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed' Consequently, the criminat petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.1330 of 2020 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil 3 Judge-cum-II Additionat Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri, against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. S l- SRINIVASA REDDY SI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. The ll Additionar Junior civir Judge-cum-il Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri.

2. The XIX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Rachakonda at Malkajgiri. 3 The station House officer, p.s. Kushaiguda, Rachakonda commissionerate. 4. One CC to Sri C. Hari preeth, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CCs to the pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana, Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies GH/ABK w Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise :._l i;: sii;}I.. '1 1( i: .)l,) m [t]T 206 \::"-'+-'\l'.."'- .;...!,, t ''' HIGH COURT DATED:17l09/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.10171 ot 2022 ALLOWING THE CRL.PETITION. q ""dd F,* HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANA AT HYDERABAD .- 5-"- Crt.p.No. 1017t af 2022 AGAINST (on the nre orrr Additionari:#%1;1i9,:fg'"%,,1;_,, Magistrate at Malkajgiri) ooon, onal Metropolitan BETWEEN: Annavanchala Radhakrishna, S/o. Late. Satyanarayana. Aged 60 years, Occ:Art. Employee, R/o.Flat No.219, Kankadhara Landmark Apartments, Raja Rajeswari N;s;;;''" ", 9:!:ld.s:j."t _T"wers, t<apra, ECIL, Hyderabad. AND ... Petitioner/tr66u5s6 I 2 The State of Telanoana.. Through S.H.O, p.5. Kus,laiguda, }1Tl!"r.ou, l9n. ov its puStic prosecutor, Hrgn court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad. Radhika @ yerala Hepsiba, .Smt. (o.A.N.Dinakar, Aged 3g years. 9_.:lfilr,?t" Emptoyee, R7o. Frat No. s0 t, xanakadhara Landmark Apartments, Behind Saket Towers, Kapra, ECIL, Hyderabad. ..Respondent OI E IE B T E U HP FOR COMP TI N ROMI E D E D T o ... Respondent/Defacto-Complainant 1' It is submitted that the 2nd Respondent herein fired the compraint before s'H'O P'S' Kushaiguda against the Quash petitioner/Accused, basing on whrch the Police have registered the Crime in F.I.R.No.522 0f 2020, dt.lg.o7.2o2oagainst the Petitioner/Accused for the offences u/sec.3s4-D, 504 or Ipc. The police after Investigation filed the charge sheet against the petitioner/466,sed for the above- mentioned offence before the Hon'bre xIX Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate, 6 '-RachakondaatMalkajgiri.Basingonwhich,thelearnedMagistratehastaken cognizance for the offences U/sec'354-D, 504 of IPC and numbered the same as C.C.No.l330of2020andnowpendingonthefileofHon,bleilAdditional]uniorCivil Judge Cum{I Additional Metropolitan Magistrate.at Malkajgirl in view of recent bifurcation of ludicial Districts. It is submitted that tie Quash Petitioner/Accused has alreadyfiledCrl.P.No.10171|2022beforethisHon,bleCourtseekingtoquashthe. ProceedingsaSagainsthiminC.C.No.1330of2020pendingonthefileofHon,bleII Additional Junior civil Judge cum-Il Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri dnd the same is Pending.

7. It is submitted that pending the above-mentioned case' a Compromise have arrivedatbeWveenthepartiestothis]ointMemoattheinterventionofour Apartmentseldersandwell-wishersofbothFamilies,whoadvisedthemtowithdraw the criminal case filed by the 2nd Respondent herein against the Quash Petitioner keeping in view of their long-standing future in the society'

3.Itissubmittedthat,inviewofthe.amicablesettlementreachedoutsidethe Courtbetweenthepartiestothis]ointMemoaspertheadviceofelderstolead peaceful life and as a part of compromise, the 2nd Respondent/Defacto-complainant herein have now decided to with draw the case filed by her in c c'No 1330 of 2020 pending on the file of Hon'ble I-I Additional lunior civil Judge cum-Il Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri against the Quash Petitioner/Accused by filing appropriate Petitions before this Hon'ble Court. 'q' It is further submitted that, in view ork uoou"-^entioned compromise, both parties to this Joint Memo have no grievance against each other and as such both parties have decided to crose the case, therefore the 2nd Respondent/Defacto- Comprainant have decided to withdraw and crose thb.Case in c.C.No.1330 0f 2020 pending on the fire of Hon'bre II Additionar lunior Civir Judge cum-Il Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate at Markajgiri, by firing this -loint Memo in the pending Quash Petition. Therefore, this Hon'bre couft may record the compromise in the interest of Justice by allowing the above quash petition. 5' In view of the above-mentioned reasons and the compromise entered between the iiarties to this joint memo, both the parties wourd co-operate for the closure of the above-mentioned case in c.c.No.1330 0f 2020 pending on the fire of Hon',bre II Additionar Junior civir Judge cum-Il Additionar Metroporitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri. It is therefore prayed that this Hon,bre court may be preased to record the terms of compromise in crr.p.No.1017r oi 2022 and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Place : Hyderabad Date: .07.2025 a titioner No.1 2nd Respondent etY.- Counsel for the euash petitioner/Accused Counsel Responde j l t t ! I 1l i, I i, i l I ,] I l' i l I l i I i i I