Miss. K. Rajya Laxmi v. Nagar, Yellandu Cross Road, Khammam
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Writ appeal along with writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 07/09/2004 in WP NO : 8736 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Miss. K. Rajya Laxmi, D/o. K. Rajeswara Rao, Chandalavada Vari Street, Bapatla, Guntur District. ..... APPELLANT
AND 1 The Sub Registrar, Kothagudem, Khammam District. 2 Md. Abdul Waheed, S/o. Md. Asgar Ahmed, Kaviraj Nagar, Yellandu Cross Road, Khammam. .....RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION NO : 8736 of 2004 Between: Miss. K.Raja Laxmi D/o K.Rajeswara Rao Chadalavada Vari Street, Bapatla, Guntur Dist AND ..... PETITIONER
1 The Sub Registrar, Kothagudem Khammam Dist 2 Md. Abdul Waheed S/o Md. Asgar Ahmed Kaviraj Nagar, Yellandu Cross Road, Khammam .....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the Marriage Certificate bearing No.250879 HM No.1/2004 dt. 3/01/2004 issued by the first respondent, the Sub Registrar, Kothagudem, as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of provisions of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Rules made thereunder, and issue a consequential direction directing the second respondent not to use the said Certificate in any manner whatsoever, against the petitioner and not to claim in any manner whatsoever, that he had married the Petitioner. Counsel for the appellant/petitioner : KUM.C.SINDHU KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the respondent No.2: None appeared. The Court made the following :
ORAL ORDER:
Operative part
( per Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice ) …… Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has received instructions to withdraw the writ appeal along with writ petition. Accordingly he makes a prayer. Prayer is allowed. Writ appeal along with writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant – petitioner is at liberty, however, to seek appropriate redressal of her grievances from appropriate forum, if available in law. No costs. _________________ BILAL NAZKI. ACJ., _____________________ DR. G. YELTHIRAJULU. J., Dated: 11.04.2005. VRK. To 1 The Sub Registrar, Kothagudem, Khammam District. 2. Two CCs to G.P., for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
Two CD copies. Form-NIC-OGS/WA {RLD} Form-NIC-OGS/WP{GR} HON’BLE SRI BILAL NAZKI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU. W.A.NO. 738 OF 2005 AND W.P.NO.8736 OF 2004. ( Order of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice ) Dt: 11.04.2005.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ appeal along with writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 11 Apr 2005. The bench was G YETHIRAJULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.