The High Court · 2025

M/s. Vedant Spa & Resorts Pvt. Ltd, Rep. Malpani S/o. Late Sri. R.N. Malpani, Rl/o Hyderabad. H. its Managing Director Sri. Manoj No. 2, Pavani Villa, Punjagutta, ..,PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, TS Secretariate, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The Tahsildar -cum- Joint Sub Registrar, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in wrongly marking the Agriculture Land in Survey No. 5214611 admeasuring Ac. 0-36 guntas situated at Karkalpahad village. Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in prohibited property list in Bhu Bharati Portal is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 , and 3004 of constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to immediately delete theAgriculture Land in Survey No.52146/1 admeasuring Ac. 0-36 guntas situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadthal fvlandal, Ranga Reddy District, from the prohibited property list in Bhu Bharati Portal. ,7 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to immediately delete the Agriculture Land in Survey No. 52146/'1 admeasuring Ac. 0-36 guntas situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, from the prohibited property list in BhuBharati Portal,pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SARDAR RAMAVATH Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.30995 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to pass an order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the action of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 in wrongly marking the Agriculture Land in Survey No.52/46/ l, admeasuring Ac.0.36 guntas situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadtl.al Manda.l, Ranga Reddy District in prohibited property list in Bhu Bharati Portal as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19,2l and 300-A of constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice, consequently to direct t1.e Respondents Nos.2 to 4 to immediately delete the Agriculture Land in Survey No.52/46/1, admeasuring Ac.0.36 guntas situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District from the prohibited property list in Bhu Bharati Portal. - - "

2. Heard Mr.Sardar Ramavath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appea-ring for respondents. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land in Sy.No.52/a6/ 1, admeasuring Ac.0.36 gutnas situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadtha,l Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, I having \ t Aurchased an extent of Ac.O.1B guntas through a registered sale deed bearing Doc No.15600/2009, dated l I I I t 2

25.11.2OO9 and Ac.O.81 guntas through a registered sale deed bearing Doc No.15599 l2OO9, dated 25.11.2OO9 and the name of the petitioner was also entered in the revenue records. Thereafter, the name of the petitioner in respect of agricultural land in Sy.No.52/46/ 1, admeasuring Ac.O.18 guntas of situated at Karkalpahad village, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was showing in the prohibited property list maintained by the State Government through Bhu Bharathi Portal. Immediately after knowing the same, the petitioner approached respondent No.4 and requested se\reral times to delete the said land from the prohibited list, but respondent No.4 failed to take any action. Therefore, he seeks to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue contends that the oral representation made by the petitioner could not be considered till date as the Telangana Bhu Bharathi Act, 2005 (for short, "the Act") has come into vogue. Therefore, he seeks a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh application in terms of the said Act before the respondent authorities and that the same would be considered as per law. I / ,/ J

5. Having regard to the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon considering the material available on record, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the petitioner to flle fresh application, as per the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharathi Act, 2OO5 seeking the said relief, On filing the same, respondent authorities are directed to examine the same by issuing necessary notices to all the interested parties and grant opportunity of hearing and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiousiy as possible.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. i \ IITRUE COPYII SD/.L, VIJAYA ASSISTANT TRAR SECTION OFFICER To, o

1. The.Principal Secreta ry to Revenue Department, TS Secretariate, State of Telan ana, Hyderab ad 2. The District Collector, Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Division er Kandukur Division Ranga Reddy District 4. The Tahsildar -cum- Joint Sub Registrar, Kadthal N/andal, Ranga Reddy 5. One CC to S RI SARDAR RAMAVATH , Advocate loPUc 6. Two CCs to GPF 7, Two CD Copies OR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana Ranga al Offic Distri ct louTj l MMT 55 I I HIGH COURT DATED:1311012025 -',iFi. SfA 74 JTl'l 7 026 * t \ )t ORDER WP.No.30995 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS o ?L