Prosecutor High Court · 2025

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri UMESH SINGH, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri. D. ARUN KUMAR, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13166 ef 2or25 ORDER: a This criminal petition is filed under Section 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short tsNSSJ by the petitioner/A.3 seeking enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.75 of 2025 of Prohibition & Excise Station, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 8(c) r/w 2O(bXiiXB) & 22(cl of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short T{DPS ActJ.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.08.2025 on reliable information about possession and transportati,on of MDMA, dry ganja by some persons the police conducted check at Jali Hanuman Temple, Dhoolpet, Hyderabad, found A.1 on Activa DIJ( and petitioner along with A.3 on Burgman Street vehicle and seized

1.510 Kgs of Ganja, O.11 grams of LSD Jelly (5) dots and 12.290 grams of MDMA from S"*. The contraband was seized from the possession of A.1 to A.3 under the cover of panchanama in the presence of panchas and the police have recorded the confession statements ol'A.1 to A.3, wherein the involvement of other accused V 2 sKs,J Crl.P.IYo. 131 66 of 2O26 came to light. As such police registered the case against the accused for tlre above offences.

3. Heard sri umesh singh,. learned counsel for the petitioner and sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent of the said offences and he has been falsely implicated in this case by the police. Petitioner is in jail from LL.O8.2O25, and he is the only bread winner of the family and he has to take care of his otd aged parents suffering from ill-health. He further contended that petitioner undertakes to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this court and prayed to grant bail to him.

5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail on the ground tJ:at 1.510 kgs of ganja, O.11 grams of LSD jelly (5) dots and 12.290 grams of MDMA was seized from the possession of petitioner'along with other accused and the LSD Jelly and the MDMA is a huge commercial quantity and investigation is still pending. However, no criminal cases are j l I 3 sKsl,J Crl.P.No.13166 of 2O2$ pending again.st this petitioner. As the contraband seized is a huge commercial qrrantity, he prayed to dismiss this petition.

6. This Court, considering submissions made by both the learned counsel and reviewing the material available on record, it is noted that the contention of the petitioner that the case is false, fictitious, and fabricated, the case was registered without following the due procedure. However, the Additional Public Prosecutor opposes bail citing commercial quantity weighing 1.510 kgs of ganja, 0.1 L grams of LSD jelly (5) dots and 12.290 grams of MDMA- At this stage, it is pertinent to note Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which reads a.s under: \ \ "37. Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable. -- (l) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 19741,--(a) every offence punishable under this Act shall be cognizable; (b) no person accused of an offence punishable for l[offences under section 19 or section 24 or section 27A and also for offences involving commercial quantityl shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless-- (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release, and (ii) where the Pubtic Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. 4 sKs,J Crl.P.f,o.l3166 of ?fr25 (2) The limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of sub-section (1) are in addition to the limitations under the Code of Criminal procedure, lgZS (2 of l974l or any other law for the time being in force on granting of bail."

7. In view thereof, Section 3T of the NDps Act mandates that offences involving commercial quantities be non-bailable, requiring reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and unlikely to commit further offences while on bail. Given the serious allegations against the petitioner, this Court is not satisfied that conditions for granting bail under Section 3T are met. Therefore, the criminal petition lacks merit and the same is liable to be dismissed

8. Accordingly, this Criminal petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, sDr- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,,TRUE COPY/ OFFICER

1. The lst Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad' 2. The lst Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad' 3.TheStationhouseofficer,DhoolpetpoliceStation,Hyderabad. 4. One CC to SRl. UMESH SINGH Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two ccs to the puBLlC pRosEcuroR, High court forthe state of Telangana [OUT].

6. Two CD CoPies ARM/PSL lf t -z HIGH COURT DATED: 2711012025 I ORDER CRLP.No.13166 ot 2025 EH1 s I4 (,) J 2 6 tr0tl 2m ((s * * PATC trr'-o DISMISSING THE CRLP "%