Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL, ADDITIONAR JUNIOR CIVIR
Outcome
Dismissed
Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. SD/. AHMEDABDULLAH KHAN s TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1' The Additionar Junior civir Judge - cum - Additionar Judiciar Magistrate of…
Judgment
Cause title
'I . The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. Through S.H.O. Chilapur Police Station, Jangaon Disrict.
2. O.Kumara Swamy, S/o not know, Aged about. Major, Occ. Head Constable (HC-2159), Police Station, Chilapur, Chilapur Mandal, Jangaon District. ...RespondenUComplai nant Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in C.C.No.374 of 2023 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court), Jangaon and the same may be quashed against the petitioner/Accused No. 4. l.A. NO: 1OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings, including the appearance of the petitioner/Accused 4 in pursuance of C.C.No.374 of 2023 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Juvenile Court), Jangaon, pending finalization of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri NARENDAR JALLI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER I i a : I j I I I I ! I I I l I il..rl ,/r THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12O57 of 2o23
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal procedure, 1973 by the petitioner,'accused No.4, seeking to qr.rash the proceedinlls against him in C.C.No.374 of 2Ct23 on the file of learned Additional Junior Civil J.udge-cum_ Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class; (Juvenile Court), Jar-rgaon (for short, the trial Court), registered for the offenc,:s punishable under Sections 420 of Indian Penal Code, Section 7 of Essentia.l Commodities Act,
No representation on behalf of the petir-ioner. Learned Assistalt public prosecutor, by furnishing a copy of e courts proceedingsr submits that cause in the Criminal Petition does not s,urvive as the subjec,t calendar case before ttre triaj Court is , t I I I I 2 disposed of. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous
Operative part
Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. SD/. AHMEDABDULLAH KHAN s TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1' The Additionar Junior civir Judge - cum - Additionar Judiciar Magistrate of First ^ 9lass (Juvenile Court), Jangao"n. 2. The Station House Offi"f,r, bhilpur potice Station, Jangaon Dist. 3 one CC to sRr NAREN^DAR Lp[Li, nJrJ*i"'i6i;ucf 4 Two CCs to the pubric prosecut.iio,. in.6iliJ"oi iJlngrn, at Hyderabad 5. Two CD Copies pM/gh ,/ I HIGH COURT DATED: 30t04t202s I t ORDER CRLP.No.1Z0St of 2023 i)o C) t * (. :llE S l4 Ar 16 JUt 2025 l' Iz Fr,., - .::--::: '-r-;H * DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS THE CRIMINAL PETITION at) s e/ 1-s 2,/7 /ts
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 420; Essentia.l Commodities Act, 1995 — s. 7.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.