The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the Petitioner Representations dated 01-09-2025, for interfering illegally into Petitioner Agricultural lands admeasuring to an extent of AC.5-22 Guntas in Sy.No.39, situated at Nagulapally Village of Faroognagar Mandal, Mahbubnagar District (now Ranga Reddy District), Telangana State,by the unofficial Respondents Ncs.5 and 6 and their henchmen; which the same has been purchased by P,:titioners father who died intestate, leaving behind the Petitioner and. his brothen;, despite having made Representation dated 01-09-2025, to not to interfere with the Petitioner schedule property of Agriculture lands, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional is clear violation of fundamental rights guarante€,d under Articles 14, 19 & 21 of Constitution of lndia and in violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated O'l-09-2025 to not to interfere into Petitioner Agriculture lands, by unofficial Respondents No.S and 6 and their henchmen, in respect of Agriculture land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.5-22 Guntas in Sy.No.39, situated at Nagulapally Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahbubnagar Di:itrict (now Ranga Reddy District), Telangana State, by disposing the Representatkrn dated 01-09-2025, in accordance to law 1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 01-09- 2025 to not to int,:rfere into Petitioner Agriculture lands admeasuring to an extent of Ac.5-22 Guntas in Sy.No.39, situated at Nagulapally Village of Faroocinagar Mandal, Mahbubnagar District (now Ranga Reddy District), Telangana State, by unofficial Respondents No.S and 6 and their henchmen, in accordance to law; Pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BOLLU NAGARA.TU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: --- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL r ORDER: This writ Petition is filed praying this court to declare the action of respondcrrt Nos.2 to 4 in not considering the petitioner's representation, dated ol.og.2o25 to take action .: against respondent Nos.S and 6, who are interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment over the land admeasuring Acs.S.22 guntas in sy.No.39, situated at Nagulapally village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of the Ffundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 2l of the constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently for other appropriate reliefs. 2- Heard Sri Bollu Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner and sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4. [n view of the nature of relief sought for in this writ petition, this writ Petition is being disposed of at the admission srage dispensing with the issuance of notice to the unof{icial respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the father of the petitioner by name T.Ramaiah was the orvner and 2 EVV, J Wp_30827_2025 posses;sor of the land admeasuring Acs.5.22 guntas in Sy.No.39, situatt:d at Nagulapalli' village, Farooqnagar }l-(andal, Mahartrubanagar district and h- ctied in the year lgg4 leaving behinc the petitioner and his brothers intestats aiid since then he, al.ng with his brothers, has been in possession of the subjecr. property. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted a represr:ntation, dated 2l-o4.2o25 to respondent No.2 and when the same was not considered, he was constrained to file w.P.No.2s198 of 2025 before this court and by an order, dated 26-08.2'025, this court disposed of the said writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to submit an online application to the oompetent authoritv, along with all relevant documents, including the joint agreement executed by both t]le petitioner anci his brorher, u,ith a request to issue succession, mutation proceedlngs and E-r:attadar passbook. l,earned counsel further submitt,:d that, in compliance with the aforesaid directions, the petitionr:r made an application bearing No.RC2s0ooorgLT under the provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short "the Bhu Bharati Act") by paying requisite fees flor entering the name of the petitioner in the re'enue records and coiisequential issuance..of pattadar passbook but, so far, no action has been taken by the official 3 EVV, J Wp_30827_2025 respondent on the said application. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further subrnit that the unofficial respondents, who are politicatly influential, are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession arrC cnjoyrrent of the petitioner over the subject property and prayed this Court to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue had submitted that the petitioner made an application in wrong module of Bhu Bharati portal and if the petitioner liles an application under Rule 7 of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rules, 2025 (for short "Bhu Bharati Rules") the same r,r'ill be considered by respondent No.4-Tahsildar in accordance',vith law.

5. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ ) \ petition granting liberty to the petitioner, firstly to claim the refund of the amount paid by him while submitting the application bearing No.RC25O00O7917 and secondly, to make an application in Bhu Bharati Portal under Rule 7 of the Bhu Bharati Rules along with a joint statement in the form affidavit srn'orn by all the legal heirs of the petitioner's deceased father 4 EVV, J wp_30827_2025 within a period ol' two (O2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy c'f this order and in Lhe event of such applieation being submir:ted by the petitioner, rc:iponden+ No.4_Tahsildar shall examirre the same and after issuing notice to ari tiie interested persons and affording an opportunity of hearing, and pass approp riate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possibl(:, preferably within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of such application. It is needless to mention that thr: petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies in accorcia:rce u'ith larv if the unoflicial respondents still interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over the subject property.

6. With the abovt: directions, this Writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if arry, shall stand closed. SD/- K. BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REG d SECTION OFFICER /,TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, Secretariat, Khairatabad The State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. The District ()ollector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongarakalan, 3. The. Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar Division, Faroognagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Tahsildar, Faroognagar Mandal, Shadnagar Division, Ranga Reddy District.

5. One CC to SiRl BOLLU NAGARAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. a [OUTI HIGH COURT ATED:10/1012025 :1r1E $ a ? 2 JA},t 2026 , :-\o() * t-=li -f WP.No.30i327 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION HOUT COSTS \