ASWINI P,N NUFI,MA w/o v. Ra r r

Judgment

1. 2 9mt.D.Amrutha, D/o.Late KDJrqqa Reddy, Wo D Bai Reddy, Aged about 52 - - fga.q, Q9q. Uousewife, R/o. Teilapur Vi[a!e, RamchanOrapLirani'lvtrnUrl Medak District. Smt.P.lndramma @ Rukamma, D/o.Late K.Dharma Reddv. Wo. p.Anii FS9Oy,n gl about 50 Yeqls, Occ Housewife, R/o. Kanakamamidi Viilage, Moinabad Mandal. Ranga Reddy District. ...Respondents/Plaintiffs 3. P.Praveen Kumar, S/o. P.Venkateshwarlu, Aged about 33 years, Occ. private lmployee_, R/o. Flat No.201 , Block-D, Sai Raghava Enclave, Beside Sri Devi Theatre, Chanda Nagar, Hyderabad

4. V.Ramakrishna, S/o. Late Rajaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Government Employee,.Rio. Flat No.202, Block-B;Land Mark Apartments, Madinaguda, Hyderabad- 500 050.

5. Chemarla Harichandra Reddy, Sio. C.Ram Reddy, Aged about 43 years, Occ.. Governmen!^Employee,'R/o Plot No. 38, Niimiti-Sai Residency, Manjeera Nagar, Sanga Reddy, Medak District.

6. Smt V. S^ri Teiaswini @ P.Anupama, Wo. V.Ramakrishna, Aged about 33 Years, Occ. Government Employee, R/o. Flat No.202, BlockIB, Land Mark Apartments, Madinaguda, Hydeiabad-5Q0 050. .)

7. Smt.Chemar a vzsantha, Wo. C.Harichandra Reddy, liged abo lt 38 Years, Occ. Houseurife: r1/o. Plot No.38, Nirmiti Sai Residency., [vle'njee 'a Nagar' Sanga Recld i, VIr;dak District. (Responde nl/D ef,:ndant Nos.3 to 7 are made as Proforrra [)arti''s) ...Respondents/Defendr;rnt Nos.2 to 6 rA NO.1 0F 2025: Petition under ()rder 23 Rule 3 R/w Section 15'1 Cl']C p,rayi rg that in the circumstances state(j n the affidavit filed in support of the petrl on. the High Court may be pleastr,J to Allow the Appeal by setting aside the . udgment and Decree dt.28lo6t2)24 in os No.101 0t 2015 0n the file of the lV Additional District Judge, S;a'rga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy in ternts o compromise without costs. Counsel for the .Appr: lants : Sri M/s Resu Law Office Counsel for the Resp,>ndent No.l & 2 : Sri B.Bal Reddy The Court made the fr>llowing : JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.No.l of 2O25 IN/AND A. S.No.618 OF 2024 COMMONIUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri f ustice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) WhenthematteristakenuPforhearing,learnedcounselfor the appellant submitted that the appellant has compromised the

matter with respondent Nos'1 and 2 and to that effect' the parties have entered into Memo of Compromise, clated 27'04'2025'and filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking to allow the appeal in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties' Learned counsel further submitted that in respect of respondent Nos'3 to 7' the appellant is not pressing the appeal' \ I 2 Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos'1 and 2 did not dispute the same.

3. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered view that since the appellant is not pressing the appeal against respondent Nos.3 to 7 and that they were only proforma parties as Per cause title, the present appeal can be disposed of by recording the compromiso el. l (,recl into betrveen the appellant a Lr ci 'espondent Nos.1 and 2 i r lryms of the Memo of Compromist:, d;Lteci 27 04'2025' annexed to [.,\. rl,r.1 of 2025.

4. Accord n11t',', I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed anc th I appeal is disposed of in le rms of the compromise enteretl into L :tween the appellant at1 r'er;pondent Nos.1 and 2 oide Menro of (l' )mlrromise, dated 21.04 2' )25. The Memo of Compromise, dated 2'.7'0' '2025, shall form part cf the decree, so as to enable the parties to it lrk out the remedies ir, trcr.rlrdance with the terms of compromlse < ntered into between thrt 1.a51,s5. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellrncous Applications, if any, pendrng in .his appeal shall s tanc'l cllsec[. //TRUE COPY// SD/- M. RAM,I\NA KRISHNA .IOIN T REQISTRAR \' .-r sEc l'loN oFFlcER \ I To 1- The lV Acrdrtiora,l District Judge, Sanga Reddy District at Sang r Reddy 2- One CC t: .iri l/l/s.Resu Law Office, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC t: Sri {3 Bal Reddy, Advocate [OPUCI 4. Two CD Oopit:r; Svsigh w F \, u:1g, \ HIGH COURT DATED:01 10511'-025 COMMON JUIIIGMENT tA 1 0F 202s IN/AND AS.No.618 of ',1024 o iH \ :::'. l-.i It 0 1 JilL ?ilfl l)() J- ALLOWING Tl{E lA No.1 OF 2025 IN/AND AND DISPOSING OF THE AS.No'61tli o12024 @r HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TETANGANA AT: HYDERABAD I.A.NO, oF 2025 1 IN A.S.NO. 618 0F 2024 BETWEEN: KHANAPURAM SAI REDDY S/o. l-ate Dharma Reddy. Aged about 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R:,i o. 1-6, Tellapur villaoe. Ramchandrapuram Ma;dal. I,tedak District. AND SI T.D,AMRUTHA D/o. Late K.Dharma Reddv. w/o. D.Bat Reddy, fgea_algut 52 years, Occ: Housewife, Ri/o. Tellapur Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, tledak District. SMT.P.INDRAMMA @ RUKAMMA D/o. Late K.Dharma Reddv. ryo. P.Anji Reddy, Aged-about 50 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Kanakamamidi Mllaoe. Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 1 2 3 .. PETmONER/ APPELLANT/ DEFENDANT NO.1 ., RESPONDE^,TS/ RESPONDENTS/ PIAINTIFFS AND P.PMVEEN KUMAR S/o. P,Venkateshwarlu, Aged_about 33 years, Occ: private Employee. R/o. Flat No.2O1, Btock-D. Sai Raghava Enclave- Beside Sri Devi Theaire. Chanda Nagar, Hyderabad. K '"'nt' Reaa. D' e, oglpJ aJ 1-r-) o $, (" ( 4 5 6 7 V. RAI'4F'Kf I] S;H NA S/o. l-a".e t aiaia h, Aged at)oul 38 Years, occ: G<rve rnment EmPloyee. R/o. I=lu t ll't 2O2, Block-8, Land M arl Apartments, Madinaguda, Hyde'atrarl . 500 05O. CHEMA 11,\ IJARICHANDRA REDDY S/o. {l.lr.arr Reddy, Aged alrorrl 43 Years, Occ: Gov< rrment Employee, R/o. l)l( t lJ r 38, Nirmiti Sal Residency/ Manjee'a lr agar, Sanga ReddY, Medak )i-. trict. SMT.'J.I;RI I'E]ASWINI @ P,N NUFI,MA w/o. V. Ra r r 3krishna, Aged al:out 33 Years. Occ: Government Employee, R/o. l=lat lI,) 202, Block-B, Land M erl. Apartments, Madinaguda, Hyde'a'-rari'l;00 050. SMT.i:I-iEII lRLA VASANTHA W/o. C Hz richandra Reddy, Aged al)ori1 38 Years, Occ: Housewife, pr/s. trlot lJ r 38. Nirmiti Sai Residency, Manjr:e'a lr;rgar, Sanga ReddY, Medak )i! tr ct. (ResFroirdr)n1:/Respondent Nos.3 to 7 are nra,je :: Proforma Parties) ., RESPONDENTI ,/ RESPONDENTI ' DEFENDANT NOs.2 TO , MEMO OF COMPROMISE That tre f\ppellanvDefendant No.1 herein had filed 're present Al)p,:ral .rggrieved by the ludgment and Decree Daj ed 28.O6.7o2a irr C,5i No.101 of 2015 on the file of the Hor''ble iV Additional t)i:itrict ludge, Sanga Reddy District at Sanqa Redrly. (t wi 1,.:.c).19 2 D,e, Qe (r' a_)o ,/" (d At6, I That the Respondents/Respondents/plairftiffs hac, iniua,ly fi led a suit with os No.101 0f 2015 0n the file of the Hon,ble IV Additional rDistrict Judge, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy against the Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No. 1 and Respondents/ Respondents/Defendant Nos.z to 6 herein for partition and Separate Possession with regard to the Suit Schedule property i.e. land admeasuring Ac.1-03 Gts., in Sy-No. 173lAy/3, Ac.1_08 Gts., in Sy.No.l9lRU, Ac.3-19 Gts., in Sy.No. 190/E, Ac.3_2g Gts., in Sy-No. 205/AA, toge-ther admeasuring Ac.9_19 Gts., situated at Iellapur Mllage, Ramachandrapuram Mandal. Sanga Reddy District, the then Medak District and house property bearing H.No.1_6, admeasuring 100 Sq.yds, H.No.1_1211, admeasuring 141 Sq.yds, situated at Tellapur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, the then Medak District. That the Suit so filed by the Respondents/Respondents/plaintiffs herein was decreed by the Hon,ble Mdditionat District ludge at Sanga Reddy in its ludgment and Decree Dated 28.06.2024. Aggrieved by the said.Judgment and Decree Dated 28.06.2024 in OS No.lol of 201S, the petitioner/Appe[anvDefendant No.1 herein preferud the present appeal. Along with the Appeal the Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No.1 herein also Rted an Interlocutory Apptication with IA No.1 of ZOZ4 seeking to stay all further pro€eedings pursuant to the ludgment and Decree Dated 2A.06.20,24 in OS No.lO1 of 2015 and the Hon,ble Court was pleased to pass interim orders Dated 13.1.1.2024 staying the passing of final decree in OS No.101 of 2015 on the fite of the Hon'ble IV Additional District Judge at Sanga Reddy and the above Appeal is pending for adjudicataon. That being so the petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No.l and Respondents/Respondents/F{aintiffs who are biorogica r brother and 3 k w u*u! l,erd) d &, c7"1-d iny r.tii:; ;ffi| '1) settle their disputes amlcably at the inllerv€ntior sisters pFopos€d of thelr resrpechve elders and well wishers' lhus th: Petitioner/App{rlirrrt/Defendant No' 1 and Respondents/Re:;pondent ; /Plaintiffs havilrg realized the prolonged legal battle and with a dee - lntention to nrale, an end for the disputes to their full and fin;rl satisfaction trarl tt<:r epted to settle the same' That the t'el iti,) l erlAppellanVDefendant No'1 in vietv of tl'': amicablesettlenl(yltandcompromisereachedwithRespondentl./ Respondent:y' Pll ntiffs had agreed to allot the land admeasurir l Ac.1-20 GL.;., out of Ac'3-19 Gts', in sy'No'190/E' situated "t Teltapur Village, tlamachandmpuram Mandal' Medak District whi( n forms part c,f Slrlit Schedule Property' which is more 'leariy delineated in the ITEM NO-1 of the Schedule Property hereund rr and hereinafl:er :eferred to as ITEM NO'1 Property to tl e Respondent/R es r cndent/ Plaint'ff No'1 towards her share Ukewise the Pet tioner/Appellant/ Defendant No'1 in view of tl e amicable s'etlement and compromise reached wil h ResPondents/qe s Dondents/Plaintiffs agreed to allot the la'rd admeasuring At.1-25 Gts., out of Ac'3-19 Gts'' in Sf'No'190/:' situated at 1-el ; grur Village, Ramachandrapuram Manrlal' Med'tk District whicl' f('rrls Part of Suit Schedule Property' whrch i!; mc '.e clearly delintrated in the flEM NO'2 of the Schedule Prcpe' ty hereunder ;rnrJ lt:-einafter referred to as ITEM NO'2 Property to tile Respondenl/tter,trondenVPlaintiff No'2 towards her share Further as f'(rr the amicable settlement' the Petition ]r/ Appellanvt)e'er rl:rnt herein is allotted with the remainirrg S lit Schedule ['rop(:Ily excluding the item Nos' 1 and 2 Pmpert es refurredhe're,in;t[lovewhichismoreclearlydelineatedintlrelTl]M NO.3 of the lichedul€ Property hereunder and hereinafter lefer ed to as ITEM Nr:).:l trroperty' 4 l1 ')oi [.'r" d,, I)t et ,j o.-), D b'c, That the allotments so proposed by the petitio ner/ Appellanl/ Defendant No.1 is agreed and accepted by the Respondents/Respondents/plaintiffs to their full and final satisfaction. Thus, the issues or disputes among the Petitioner/AppeflanvDefendant No. 1 and Respondents/ Respondents ,/Plaintifft SETTLED OUT OF COURT to their fuli and final satasfaction and the same are enuncidted in TERMS OF COMPROMISE which are tabulated hereunder. 1 2 3 4 T OF M R SE THAT the parties hereto withdraw the allegations leve ed dgainst each other in their respective pleadings in view of the amicable settlement among the parties. THAT the parties hereto agreed and accepted as the present Appeal stands allowed setting_aside the .ludgment and Decree Dated 28.06.2024 an OS No.101 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble IV Additional District ly{gs Sanga Reddy at Sanga Reddy in view of Compromise. THAT the parties hereto admit and accept as in view of the amicable setuement, the RespondenvRespondenvplaintifF No.l herein is allotted with ITEM NO.1 of the Schedule Property. THAT the parties hereto admit and accept as in view of the amicable settlement, tbe RespondenVRespondent/plaintiff No.2 herein is allotted with 1TEM NO.2 of the Schedule Property. l/.9qF..,1 u s -T)' eJ) Jr\ / d,) p; 3r, Q,"d 5t. I 5 6 7 I 9 THAT the lrirrties hereto further admit and accept al; in view rf the arrrca:ler setuement. the Petationer/Appellant /Defrlnda )t No.1 lrereir is allotted and retained with the remaining S( it Schedule F roperty excluding the ITEM NOS.1 and Z ptopefti, s which is tTEFI NO.3 of the Schedule Property. THAT tlre Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No.1 l-erein h; d aheady ali:rated land admeasuring Ac. 1-08 Gts., in liy,N,. 173/At3 out of the ITEM NO.3 property to tl e R€spond enL;i 'Respondents/DeFendant Nos, 2 TO 6 here: under a R€gistered Sale Deeds Dated 28.03.2O13 bearir g Docurnent Nos, 73A2/m13, 73af12}73, 73a0t21t. , 7379/'.>-013 and 7378/2OL3 respectively. Further the, sa I transactions are accepted and ratified by tt _. Responden rilRespondents/Pla intiffs herein THAT tle llrties hereto declare through this terms 'f comprofiris'] :]s they are exclusive owners and possessors r !. their r,espe:,ive allotted properties and no others will hav: any adyers{) i.tterest against each other- THAT lhr: l);rrties hereto agree, accept and decla'e as an / Movable or Immovable Properties purchased by ther ) respectively shall be their exclusive pnd self-ac<1uire I propertie i .rrl therefore no others will have any claim, tiue c - int€r€s1. th€ sarne, r,y€r THAT the P,l ties hereto are entitled to transfer or ,:hange c m,utate [heir respective names in the Governmen t Rearrd , such as Fl.e! € r ue, Gram Panchayath, Electricity, Wa ter Work 1{ +.. ,)-,i\) 6 D,E' orl H(_/ - )r ^1t 1.O JDp_, .r--) and other Authorities or whatsoever to the extent of their respective a[otted properties in this compromise for whach the parties hereto sharr co-operate with each other whire attesting their respective signatures if so necessary for such Pnrcesses

10. THAT the Respondents/Respondents/plaintiffs or their respective legal heirs or ar ".,^,n l'r;;: ff .:fi ::, J:"':J"tl"; sh a r r n or ha ve n ow claim of any nature over the Item No.3 property allotted to the Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant, relying on Judgment and Decree Dated 2a.O6-2O24 in OS No.101 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'bte IV Additional Di ludge sanga Reddy District at sanga Reddy as ,, ,, ,t"ttt low set-a-side by virtue of this compromise.

11. 12- THAT the parties hereto agree and accept as they or any persons claiming thmugh them shafi not make any hindrance or interference against each other from the enjoyment of their respective allotted pmpertics. THAT the parties hereto agree and accepts as the above Appeal with AS.NO. 618 of 2OZ4 stands Allowed setting_ aside the ludgment and Decree Dated 28.06.2024 in OS No.lol of 2015 in terms of compromise thereby to pdss a finar decree in terms of present compromise.

13. TIIAT the parties hereto shall Registration Fee proportionately Schedule properties if so reguired. bear the Stamp Duty and on the value of allotted lz X-; Mo) 7 'v.(, '!J d ;r, nL"d 5e

14. THAI t're [)irrties hereto shall further execute and regis;ter l']e documenls if so required to attain the pious intention of t lis Terms of :ompromise. However the required :;tamp Dr ty and tlegistrition Fee or any other expenses be blrne by l'le jointly in proportionate to market value cf th:ir parties h€reto alloft€d p,1rJ)erties.

15. THAT the parties hereto declare and agree as rhe l;resr nt ludgrnr:nt and Decree in terms of compromise is executa,le before ,'.hi: l-1on'ble Court in default of their honourirg. F Ery SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY All that tre land admeasuring Ac.1-03 Gts., in Sy.lro. t73tN3, Ac. l-{}il Gts.. in 5y.No.l97lRU, Ac.3-19 Gts., in Sy.l o. 190/E, Ac.-': -:19 (its., in Sy.No. 2D5/ AA, together admeasurinrl Ac I- 19 Gts., sii:u,rt€r(l at Tellapur Village. Ramachandrapuram Mand rl, Sanga Redrly Di;rict. the then Medak District and bound'-.d on: .a-.9u@ NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Neighbort land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land &urndaries of land in sv,No. L97lRu NORTH souri-l EAST WEST Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's Iand Neighbor's land lL C.7t { _!i E D etq A, e, F Bounda es of land In Sv. o. tg()tE NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Bounda.ies of land in sv.No, 2O5lAA NORTH : SOUTH : EAST : : WEST Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land Neighbor's land All that the part and parcel of house property bearing H.No.1- 6, admeasuring 10O Sq.yds, H.No.1-1211, admeasuring 141 Sq.Yds, siuat€d at Tellapur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, the then Medak District and bounded on: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST Boundarig.s of H.No. 1-6 Property of K. Parma Reddy Property of K. Sadanand Reddy Road Property of K. Penta Reddy Boundaries of H.No,1-12lr. Road Road Property of Katike Satyanarayana Road t ..Soi Reary 9 D'e, "ud ._/ l.nA"r@ &{ . * r.,::l:iilj .J K ITEM NO. (Allottr# to I espondent/Respondent/Plaintiff No.1 ir terrns o' compromise) All that :hr: land admeasuring Ac.1-2O Gts., in :;y.N1,19 l/E, situated rt Tellapur Village, Ramchandidpuram Mardal, Mt lak District. and borlrded on: Boundari€s ,)f ,\c.1-00 Gts., out of Ac.1-20 Gts., in Sy.No. 1'10lE NORTIT : SOUTIT : EASI WEST : : IAND OF P.INDIRAMMA LAND OF K. PRASHANTH REDD\ & D- SANOTSH LAND OF P. RAVI & M. VENKATp'IAH IAND OF K. UMA & Y. SATHYAN.ARA-\'ANI BouMaries of r\: 0-20 Gts,, out of AC.L-aO Gts., in Sy.No. 1')0/E NORTII : SOUTII : : EASI WEST : LAND OF P.INDIRAMMA IAND OF K. RAGHUPATHI REDDY LAND OF K, RUKMA REDDY LAND OF YASHWANTH REDDY ITEM NO.2 (Allotte{ to [l,rspondenvRespondenvPlaintiff No.2 in terrns o' compromise) AII thz,t 1l c land admeasuring Ac.1-25 Gts., in liy.N,r.19'rlE, situated ;rt Trl l;rpur Village, Ramchandrapuram Mardal, M( lak District, alrd bc trrrded on: t,I<. ><\i ?,. cl I - -./ t0 D, tt "u r; c,j ''),"d iPL L-. -ltm ilix**: I Boundaries of Ac.1-O0 Gts., out of Ac.1-25 Gts., in Sy,No. 190/E: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LAND OF K. MADHAVA REDDY LAND ALLOTTED TO D. AMRUTHA LAND OF P. RAVI & M. VENKATAIAH LAND OF K. UMA & Y. SATHYANARAYANA Boundaries of Ac.0-25 Gts., out of Ac.1-25 Gts.. in Sy.No. 190/E: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LAND OF K. MAHANAND REDDY AND LAND OF K. SAI REDDY LAND ALLOTTED TO D. AMRUTHA LAND OF K. RUKMA REDDY LAND OF YASHWANTH REDDY ITEM NO.3 (Allotted to Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No.1 in terms of com p rom ise) All that the land admeasuring Ac.1-O3 Gts., in Sy.No. ll3/A/3, Ac.1-08 Gts.,(sold out) in Sy.No.197lRU, Ac.0-14 Gts.. including Borewell, in Sy.No. t9O/E, Ac.3-29 Gts., in Sy.No. 2O5/AA, together admeasuring Ac.6-14 Gts. out of Ac.9-19 Gts., situated at Tellapur Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, the then Medak District and bounded on: Bound aries of la nd in Sv.No. 173lAl3 NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST LAND OF MANO] LAND OF K. SUMATHI LAND OF KOTE LAXMAIAH LAND OF K. ANANTH] REDDY k sa\edLy D,w "!) ,t a) m o(-CJ ttp B!-undaries of land in Sv.No. 19O/E IAND OF K. SUMATHAMMA LAND ALLOTTED TO P. INDIRAMT"IA IAND OF YESHWANTH REDDY LAND OF K. RUKMA REDDY Brrtnda es of la dinSv. o.2O5 IAA LAND OF JALAL LAND OF BOLLARAM RAMESH MY HOME VITIAS ROAD NORT H SOUTH EAST WE51- NOR-IH SOUTH EAST wE51. All that th€ lart and parcel of house property bearing Il'No 1- 6, admeastrri.1g -.{)0 Sq-yds, H-No'1-12/1, admeasuring 141 Sq'Y ls' situated al I-ellitirur Village, Ramachandrapuram MarLdal' Sat ga Reddy District, ltr(: then Medak District and bounded on: Boundaries of H.ilo 1-6 PROPERTY OF K. PARMA REDDY PROPERTY OF K. SADANAND REI)DY ROAD PROPERW OF K. PENTA REDDY Bourdaries, of H.NP-1-12/1 ROAD ROAD PROPERTY OF KATIKE SATYANAIIAYT' NA ROAD NOR'I'H SOUIH EASI wES-t- NOR.I-H SOUI-H EAST wESt-

9.,, l,,,iJd! 12 e, aU PJ ,l'.), {r) @ It is therefore prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to ALLow the Appear by setting-aside the rudgment and Decree Dated 28.O6.2024 in OS No.101 of 2015 on the file of the Hon.ble IV Additional District ludge, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy in terms of compromise without costs in the interest of lustice. PLACE: HYDEMBAD DATED: 21.04.2025 COUNSEL FOR PETMONER,/ APPETI.ANT ,ra' {/t'' COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

14. c.o; Py,Jd,y PETINONER./ APPELIANT a,e*l) el RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.1 ,t. qqd tuo RESPONDENT/ RESONDENT NO.2 Il/ l,qi RUty 13 *4) ,e JA. (6) oPG o G a.) "