The High Court · 2025

of-the Constitrrtion of tndia [raying that in the - circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or Direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner request for exercise the web options for the. ongoing/next phase of counseling, for - admission/counseling into undergraduate Courses i.e., MBBS/BDS, for academic year 2025-2026' under 'B' category Management Quota for ongoing/next phase of counseling, for admission into MBBS/BDS, Course, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and permit the petitioner request to exercise the web options for the ongoing/ next phase of counseling for admission/counseling into undergraduate courses MBBS/BDS, for academic year 2025-2026, under B Category Management Quota IANO:1OF 2O25 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner request to permit her to f.'ffiI"!rn exercise the web options for the ongoing/next phase of counseling, for ad miss ion/coun se ling into undergraduate courses i.e., MBBS/BDS for academic year 2025-2025, under "B" category f\4anagement Quota for ongoing/next phase :of: counseling, Pernding Disposal of the Writ petition Counsel for the P etitioner: SR I B. OM PRAKASH YADAV Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI TANDRA RAMESH, AGP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SRI T. SHARATH, SC FOR KALOJI NARAYANA RAO UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES The Court made the following; ORDER I r I i THE II ON-BLE TIIE CHIEF' AND H THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M .MOHII]DDIN WRIT PETITI ON No.3O7 30 of2025 ORDER: Sri B. Om Prakash Yadav, Iearned counsel appears for the petitioner. Sri Tandra Ramesh, learned Assistant Goverrrment Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Sri T.Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences (hereinafter referred to as, "the University")' appears for iespondent No.2.

2. This writ peution has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to permit her to exercise web option for admission into undergraduate courses i.e., MBBS/BDS under Management Quota "B" category for the academic yeau. 2025-2026 in the next phase of counselling. 2

3. The case of the petitioner is that she had only registere,l under ,,A', category. However, due to lack of knowledge, she could not exercise web option in the first phase of counselling, for admission into BDS course under "8" category for the academic year 2025_26 before 2:00 p.nr. on 24.09.2C.25 in terms of the notification dated 22.09.2025. the University has 4 karned Standing Counsel for referred to the notification dated

22.09.2025. It is submittecl that the note and instructions to the candidates, categorically specify that the candidates in the final merit list, who Co not exercise web opfions in the first phase of counsellir:.g, shall not be eligible to exercise web options in the subs,:quent phase of counselling to prevent seat blocking. Petitioner is one such candidate, who has not exercised her web options in the first round of counselling nor has opted for admission into BDS course under ..B,, category. ."vhereafter she could avail the remaining seats under 'CINRI' quota. He submits that the corrigendum dated 04.lO.2O2S and 06.1O.202S permits fresh \ 3 fegistratloh= -only E sucfcandfietrS; who hatl-exercisecl web options. Therefore' the petitioner does not fit in the said category. He, however, submitS that if the petiuoner makes a representation, the University would consider it in accordance with law

5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing counsel for Universi{y and having regard to the above facts and circumstances, petiUoner is allowed liberty to make a respondent No.2-UniversitY in representation before respect of her claim for exercise of web oPtions for admission into BDS course, for the academic yeax 2025-26 under "B" category' On receipt of such representation' the University would consider the same in accordance with law within a period of two daYs. If the University allows the petitioner to exercise her 6. web options, her case shall be considered in the unfilled seats in the moP-uP round. I I t I :i li, 4 7: Lef it tre made clear that we ave no arIT opinion on the merits of the case.

8. Accordingly, the writ petifion is disposed of. There shall be no order as lo costs. Mis<:ellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand clos,ed. //TRUE COPYII SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR G- SECTION OFFIGER i I To, J 4 Wa ranga I State_of Tela n ga na Selretariat BuitOings, HVOerabld' 1 . The Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Family Welfare Department, . The Registrar Kaloji Nararayana Rao "Univ6rsity;iiealth 2 . One CC to Sri B Om prakash yadav Advocate [OpUC] . Two CCs to Gp For lvledicat Heatrh & ramily w'eltaL, hign court for the state of Telangana. [OUTI . one cc to sri r. Sharath, SC for Karoji Narayana Rao University of Hearth Sciences (OP,JC) . Two CD iopies b. IVBC GJP Sciences, 5 HIGH COURT DATED: 10IL0L2O25 :: \''-- - t_,-:t r', . .:,, 't::. )-,, i ,. () I ;- ,' .S $ + li.i + u_ t+'!l ;firi i't! ORDER WP.No.30730 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS