Bollaram Kanakaiah v. HRO1142612024-25 dated 3011212024 issued by the 3rd

_ Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be J Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by setting aside the circular APGVB/Per & HRDl1423l2-Q24-25 dated 30-12-2024 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary an( unconstitutional and to direct the respondent to conduct further selectiqn prqoess and regularize service by giving appoirltment qrder to the petltioner in the interest af justice. I i NO; { OF 25 Fgtitigp under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirQumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court r-naY be pleased to gusperl( the cir:cular APQVB/Pqr&HRD|142312024-25 dated 39-12-2024 io interest of justice 4+e+!rys20 Pgtition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in Ihe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tp dlrect lhe respondent to conduct further selection process and regulariTe by givlng gppoinlqren! order to the petitioner in the interest of justice. Counsgl for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI gpunsel forlhe Respondent No.1: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUUIAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsql for the Respondgnts No.2 to 4: SMT. V. UMA DEVI, STANDING COUNSEL WRIT PETITION NO: 2857 OF 2025 Between: Devaarnbhatla Krishna Murthy, S/o, Late D. Subramananyam, Purohit, R/o. H.No.'1-10-28124715 P No 186, Bhagwan Cherapally. Kushaiguda, Telangana - 500062 Aged: 55 Years, Occ. Colony, Chakripuram ...PETITIONER AND, 4

1. Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary to the Govt. of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of f=inancial Services, Jeevandeep Building, 3rd Floor, Sansad Marg, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

2. National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, Rep. by its Chairman, Office at: C24 Bandiakurla Complex Bandra East Mumbai - 40005.1.

3. Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By State Bank of India) Rep by its Chairrnan. Warangal, Telangana State.

4. The State Bank )f lndia, Rep. by its Chairman, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai. ..RESPONDENTS Bgtition under Article 2?6 st the Cgnsfitution of lndia praying that in the pircumgtance,s stated in the gffidavit filed thergwith, the High -court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction mgre particularly one in the nature pf writ of mandamus !y setting aside the eircular APGVB/Per &HRD1142612024-25 dated 3011212024 issued by the 3rd respondent aq illegal, a(bitrary and u nconstituliona! and tq direct the respondent to cgnduct furthet sglPctigl pfggess End t.egulalize seryice py giving qppointmeqt grder to the pel!tioner l4}e:"+Qry9?E petitigp under Section '1 91 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed in support ef the petitiqn, the High $ourt may be pleased to Cqlpeng thg gilcu lar APGVB/Per&FI Rqn 426 12024'25 dated 30 I 1 212024 in lA NO: 2 OF 2025 .,.. Petitiqn under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affiqavit flled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direcl lhq respondqnt to conduct further selection process gnd regularize by giving ?ppoin16"nt order to the petitioner in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respo ndent No.1 : SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Coqnsel for the Respondents No.2 to 4: SMT. V. UMA OEVI, STANDING COUNSEL j WRIT PETITION NO: 30285 OF 2024 Between: Gaftu Nagaraju, S/o. Srinivas, Aged: 35 years, Occ: APGVB Messenger, Siddipet lr/ain Branch-8159, Siddipet Dist, R.O. Office. Siddipet, Telangana State. At'lD Z 2 4 .,.PETITIONEB i I Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary to the Govt. of lndia, Min-istry of Finance, Qepartrnent of Financial Services, Jeevandeep Building, 3'" Floor, Sansad $arg, Pgrliament Street, New Delhi. National Bapk of Agriculture and Rural Developmqnt, Rep. by its Chairman, Qffice at: C24 Ba4diakurla Cemplex Bandra East Mumbai - 400051. Andhra Pradesh Gramegna Vikas Bank, (Sponsorqd By State Bank of lndia) Bgp by lts Chairmari, Wilangql Telangana State. k of lndia, Rep, by its Chairman, Vidhqn Bhqvan Nariman {4r9, ...REqPONDEI{TS Betitiqn undgr A(iqle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying th'at in the circumslpncqg statgd in lhe pffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased'to i-qque an applopriate Writ, Order gr direction more parlieularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside impuqned proceedings No. APGvQlf eq$uRDt1QB7 t?Q?4-?025 Dt.22 10.2024 issued by the Respondento aQ illegal grbitrary and un-cpnstitutional and consequenty direct the Bggpqndenl tg ellqw the Pgtitipnef for further gelectlpn process and to qonsider hia qppqint$eot as per [i; pedqrmqnce iq perggnal hearing along with others I lA NO: { OF 2A24 .r"... fgtition under Seqtion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavi! filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to digpenqe Wlth the Neat Copies of the Material Pqpers (Veuchers, Bank Stalemgnts, Bank Letters and Vouchers Register etc.,) in the above petition. NO:2OF 24 Fetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings No.APGVB/Per&HRD1108712024-2025' Dt. 2?.10.2024 pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of the Justice. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 6 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to allow the Petitioner for further selection process and to qgrlsider his-appointment as per his performance in personal hearing along with others in the interest of the Justice. Cgunsel for the Petitioner: SR! AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI Cgunsgl for the Respondent No.1r $Rl GAPI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY 99tICITOR 9ENEBAL OF INDIA Cqunsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SMT. V. UMA DEVI, STANDING COUNSEL 0oqns$l for the Respondent No.4: SR! AJ94t, RAVI BAFU, STANDING COI'NSEL w ITP o N s31 F 24 Between: Ananthoju Naveenachary, Messenger, H.B. Colony Telangaha Stqle. ANP S/o. R Brahch aghavachary, Aged: 37 -8 189, Siddipet Dist., years, Qcc R.O. Offlce. APGVB Siddipet, ...PETITIONER 1 2 ?. 4 Union of lndia, Rep bv its Secretary tq the Govt. of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of trinaniial Services,- Jeevandeep Building, 3'o Floor. Sansad Marg, Parliament Street, New Delhi. Nationat Bank of Aqriculture and Rural Development, Rep oy its chairman' Office at: C24 Bandiakurla Complex Bandra Egst Mumba! - 400051. Andhra Pradestr Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By State Bank of lndia) Rep. by its Chairman. Warangal, Telangana State. The State Bank of lndia, Rep. by its Chairman, Vidhan Bhavan [v'larg, Nariman Point, Mumbai ...RESPONDENTS Petitigq under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancqs stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropnate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside impugned proceedings No. APGVBIPeT&HRDI 1 08612024-2025 Dt 22.1 0.2024 issued by the Respondents as 7 illegal arbikary and u n-constitutiona I and consequently direct the Respondent to allow the Petitioner for further selection process and to consider his appointment as per his performance in personal hearing along with others.pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest of the Justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to sugpend the impugned proceedings No. APGVBiPeT&HRD/108Q/2024-2Q25 Dl.22l1Ql2Q2! pending diqpos4l of the maio writ pelition. lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ':-:=, -T-----T- Pptition under seglion 151 cPC prayirlg that in the circumstances stated in the ?ffidAvit file{ !n support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tq direct the Respondent to qllovy the Petitioner for furthe!' selection process and tq gqppider hig qppo!p!me1! as pgr his performance in pqrEonal hearing algng With Athers the iAterep! of the Juqtice, Counse! for the Pelitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI cou nsel fos the Rse ponqent Ner : s Rr f tB!.?5,+XER?firJHif ,or,, o,o Counsel for tb9 Rggpondent N9.2 Q 3;_SxlT,_V.. U_I$_D-E!],_. STANPING POUNSEL gqunsel for the Regponflent {o.4l SB!aJQAL.RAYI-!+P_U_' STANDING cOUNSEI- WRIT PETI to NO: 353 0F 2 Between: Butti Balakrishna, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged: 37 years, Occ: APGVB tulessenger, Chinnakpdur Branch - 8188, Siddipet Dist, R.O. Office: Siddipet, Telangana State. ...PETITIONER AND

1. LJnion of lndia. Reo. bv its Secretarv to the Govt. of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Department oi finaniiat Services,'Jeevandeep Building, 3'o Floor, Sansad . Marg, Parliament Street, New Delhi. '.t I I I I i l I I 8 I

2. National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development' Rgp . !y^i!s- Chairman' - ijifil ;i'-Cr+ aanaiaruila complex Bandra Ea6t Mumbai - 400051' 3. Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Spflnsored By State Bank of lndia) - R;p by its Charrman, Warangal, Telangana State 4. The State Bank of lndia' Rep by its Chairman, Vidhan Bhavan Marg' Nariman .-.RESP.NDENT' Point' Mumbai Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutign of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High qourt may he pleasedtoissueanappropriateWrit'orderqrdirectignmoreparticularlyonein the natqre of writ of Mandamus by setting aside impugned proceedings No' 6PGVQ{per&H RDt1OBB2o24-292s D\.22 1Q,2Q24 i9su9{ bv fhe Respondents as illegalqqbitraryandUn-constitutionalandcoQsequentlydirecttheBespoldentto gl|aw the petitioner for further selection p[qcess and tq qonsider hls appgintment qs p", hi. performanr:e in perEonal hearing along with olherg Ben{i6g disposal of thg malq Writ Petition O:1OF2 24 |etitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the Petition, the High 0gu4 rnay be pleased to suspenq tl,e impugned proceedings No'APGVB/Per&HRD/,1088/2024-?025 D\.?2.|Q.2O24pendingdisposalofthemainwritpetitignintheinterestofthe Justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 <;t-----:-- PetitionunderSectionl5lCPcprayingthatinthecirgumstancesstatedin the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may h'e pleased to direct the Reppon{pnt to allow the Petitioner for further selection process and to cpnsider his appointrnent as per his performance in personal hear:ing along with gthers in the interest of the Justice' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 9 Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SMT. V. UMA DEVI, STANDING COUNSEL Counsg! for tfre Respondent No.4: SRI AJGAL RAVI BABU, STANDING COUNSEL WRIT PETITIO NO: 31292 OF 2 24 Betweqn: Shaik Suribabu, S/o _Appa Rao, Aged: q1 years, Occ: Un-Employed, R/o. Tempolqrily_stqying.at G-round Floor:, Shobha Bedidency, $riram Coloriy, kaitilapqr, MoQsapet, Kukatpally - 5000.18, Telanqana Slat'e ..PETITIONER AND 1 2 Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary tg the Ggvt. of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services. Jeevandeep Building, 3'0 F[oor, Sansad [\darg, Parliaryent Qtreet, New Delhi. pqtional Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, Rep by its Chairman, gfficg qt C24 Bandrakurla Complex Bandra East MUmbai 400051.

3. Andhra .PrqQeqh g!.eTggna likqp Bap(, (Spqlsqled By $tatq Bank of lndia) Rgp by its Chairmqn, Wdrangal, Telangana State. 4 Ihg 9t-aJe 9qlk ot lndia, Rep by its Chairman, vidhan Bhavan Mgrg, Nariman ..RESPONDENTS Foint, Mumbai. Fqtitiqp under Article 226 of the ConstitutiQn of lndia praying that in the cireumElances stated in the qffidavit filed therewith, lhe High Court may be pleased to is$ue an appropriate Writ, Order pr dirgction more partipularly one in the nalgre gf Wril 9f Mandamus Qy settipg aside impugneq proceedings Ng. APGVBIPeT&HRD|1Q91 12024-2021 Dl.?2.10 2024' issue( by the Respondents a$ illegal arbitrary an( u n-constitutional and cg;rgequently direct the Respondent te gllow tfe Pgtitiqnef for further selection prqgegs and to eonsider hls appointTen! as per his pgrformance in personal hearing algng with pthers pending disposal of the main Writ Petitien lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition undeJ Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suqpend the impugned proceedings No.APGVB/Per&HRDi1091/2024-2025 D1.22.1Q 2024 pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of the Justice. I I I 10 IA NO;20F 2024 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstancesstatedin t!'rg affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may !e pleased to direct theReqpondqnttoallowthePetitionerforfurtherselectionprocessandto consider his appointment as per his performance and records along with others in lhe intqrgst gf the Justice Qqrlnset for lhe Petitioner: SRI AVAQESH NARAYAN QANGlll oo u nse r ro r th e Res p o n o *. " ", J i ;$f f t "'.?E+f_=$uTlrJHtl e F r N D r A eoqnssl for tfie Respondent No.2 ", I?II,.'*B%o,E:1,. Qeunsel for tfre Respondent No.4 : 9Rl AJGAL RAV|S.t?:qi srANplNq couNsEl- WR T PETITION N 1 83 F 4 Betweqn: Gaini Sanieevulu S/o. Bheemaiah, Aged: 4'l il n , cnabta B Village Post: Tadkal, Manda :50?287. vears. Occ: APGVB Messanger, R/o. 1- [: Kangti. S4ngareddy. Telangana State .,,- .,,PETITIONER AtlD ? a 4 1 Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary to the Govt of lndia, Minlstry of Finance' iii",iii"i-s"*iCes.' Jeevandeep Quildins, 3'o Floor, sansad il;i#;;i';i Marg, Parliament Street, New Delhi. National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Develgpm-ent' $9p ^btl^its iifri;; ;i c2+ aunO,ixuria complbx Bandra East titlqmbai ' 400051 Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By Statq Bank qf lndia) nep Uy its Chairman, Warangal. Telangana State' Chairman' ThestateBankoflndia,RepbyitsChairman,VidhanBh4vanMarg'Nariman Point' Mumbai ...RE'P.NDENT' petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstanceg stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Qourt may be pleased to isgue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in lhe nafure of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside impugned proqeedings Nq. APGVB/Per&H RD I 1 090 12024-2025 Dt.22l 1012024 issued by the Respondents as illegal arbitrary and u n-constitutional and consequently direct the Respondent to allow the Petitioner for further selection process and to consider his appointment as per his performance and records along with others in the interest of the Justice. A NO: 1 OF 2024 Petitigl undet Sectian 151 CPC praying that in the cirqumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be plqased to suspend the impugng{ prpceedings t',19'APGVB/P9r&HflD/.1090/2024-2025 Dt.22t1Ol2O24 pending disposal of the main writ petitign in the interest of the Justice. A o oF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirqumstanses stated in the affidavit filed in sqpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Reppondgnt to allow the Petitioner for fu(her Eelectign process and tQ consider his appointment as per his perforqance and repords along with others Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI Counsql for the Respondent No.1: sB! G4?l fF4YEEltI.u-Utl,^- .-.-. - DEPUTY SOLICITOR qENERAL OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3'_s_l{I:I:9I|JFY],_. STANDING 9OUNSEL Counsg! for the Respondent No.4: SRI AJGAL RAVI 9AB_U'. srAl!orn<i CoU-iiisel The Court made the following: COMMQN QBDER I THE HON'BLEI SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAIESHWAR RAO 8 AND 30285, 3o331. 303s3. 3L292. 3t 3A3 0F 2024 PETITION N 2A57 0F 2 COMMON ORDER: Since a common issue is involved in all these Writ Petitions, with the consent of both sides, they are heard together and being disposed of by this common order.

2. W.P.No.22B1 of 2025 is taken as a lead case for the disposal of all these Writ Petitions.

3. W.P.No.22B1 of 2025 is filed seeking to issue an approprlate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside the Circular No.APGVB/Per&HRD/1424/2024-25, dated 30.12.2024 issued by respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary and u ncon stitutiona I and to direct the respondent to conduct further selection process and regularize service by giving appolntment order to the petitioner in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

4. Heard Sri Avadesh Narayan Sanghi, Iearned counsel for the petitioner, and Smt. V. Uma Devi. learned Standing Counsel for re.spondent Nos.2 to 4. Perused the material on record.

5. The case oF the petition"r, ,'n 0.,"r, is that the petitioner is an employee of Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank and has worked from t997 to 2019, rendering continues services without any gap during the said period. The respondent - Bank had introduced a Schi:me with certain conditions, including a written test, which is impossible for the petitioner to comply. As such, the petitioner challenged the unreasonable conditions in W.P.Nos.6541, 6930, 6985 and 11988 of 2023. The said writ petitions were allowed and an order dated 21.07.2023, which was challenged in W.A.No.1167 of 2023 by the respondent, but the same was dismisseti vrde judgment dated 31.01.2024. Having not satisfied by the same, the respondent has filed SLP (C) No.10119-1012212024 which was also dismissed vide order dated 13.05.2024. As a result, the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21.07.2023 has attained finality.

6. Subsequently, a fresh scheme without such conditions was released on 13.06.2024, calling for applications to be submitted on or before 28.06.2024. Accordingly, the petitioner had submitted his application before the cutoff date. However, the petitioner's application was rejected vrde impugned letter dated 30.12.2024' issued by respondent No.3, which reads as follows: "We refer to your representation received on 28.77.2024 in connection to the directions in Writ Appeal No,7726 of 2024 and inform that the Bank has verified all the records .j submitted by you in order to demonstrate period of service worked in the Bank.

2. On verification, the documentary evidence submitted by you demonstrate that you have not fulfilled the criteria of having worked for a period of 7O years in the Bank as on 37.72.2077, as required in accordance with the scheme of regularization dated 73.02.2023. Therefore your representation dated 28.17.2024 disposed of accordingly as aforementioned." Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

7. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, respondent No.3 has filed counter affidavit denying various allegations made in the Writ Petition. The averments made in Paragraph No.16 of the counter, which is relevant, is extracted hereunder:

76. It is further submitted that after verification documents, the scrutiny committee has observed under: Name of the applicant Scrutiny Committee Remarks Ananthoi u N aveenachary I

7. In the year 2072, it is observed applicant worked for 3 days in the absence of permanent messenger. 2, From Sept. 2073 to Nov. 2077, applicant worked as sweeper before bank business hours for half an hout in a day and he was not engaged as casual/daily wagef. 1 I 4 I I

3. From Dec. 2077, the applicant worked as causal/daitY wager and thereafter from Jan- 2078 he worked through outsourcing agencY for housekeePing works' Hence, considering his service from Dec. 2077 to 73.O2.2023 i'e, cut-off date as fixed in scheme, the aPPlicant has not worked 70 Years as casual/daily wager as required under scheme. Hence, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents sought for dismissal of the Writ Petition. In retaliation, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that 8. the impugned rejection order dated 30't2'2024 passed by respondent No.3 lacks proper clarification as regards service particulars of the petitioner and that the service duration of the petitioner in the impugned order has not been explained in a proper and detailed manner. The case of the petitioner has been rejected merely on the ground of not completing 10 years of service' without proper explanation about the service details of the petitioner and the dates involved therein, and it is a cryptic in nature' 9 The cases of the petitioners in other Writ Petitions also stand on the same footing. l 10. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of directing the respondent authorities to pass a speaking order for rejecting the cases of the petitioners vlde impugned order dated 30.12.2024, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in these Writ Petitions, shall stand closed. \ To, //TRUE COPY// sol-e. sntutvASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR fNL -,,'- \ I \Ecrtott oFFlcEd ./ -

1. The Secretary to the .Govt of lndia' Ministry of Finance' Department of Financial Services, un,#oi r"n'oi''"i?""'naleip Building' 3'0 Floor' Sansad irirrg,Erl"*"nt Street, New Delhi'

2.Thechairmarr,NationalBankofAgricultu-reandRuralDevelopment'officeat ' i:iiEiiiiairlr, comprJx ainoraEast Mumbai - 40005'l 3. The Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank' (Sponsored By State " A'i"r-oil"oii),'warangal' Telangana State 4. The Chairman, State Bank of lndia' Vidhan Bhavan Marg' Nariman Point' Mumbai.

5. One QQ to SRI AVADEQH NAMYAN SANGHI' 46r'recate tOPUql 6. One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' Deputy Solicitor General of lndia IQPUCI

7. O1e CQ to SMT. V. UMA DEVI, Standing Counsel [OPUC] 8. One eQ to M/s ANJALI AGARWAL, S C. for EnfQrcement Directorate loPU9l

9. One CQ to SRI AJGAL RAVI B$BU, Standing Counsel tqPUCl 10.Qne CC to SRI M VIJAY KUMAR, SENIOR S.C. for eentral Government IoPU0l {1 Two QD Coptes l3 . HIGH COURT DATED:2510212025 ;.rc -'i'ia"O ,', z C 2025 ,) .,4 \ t :sp/.'i r1 COMMON ORDER W.P.Nos.2281, 2329, 2857 OF 2025 AND 30285,30331,30353, 31292,31383 0F 2024 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITTONS WITHOUT COSTS &