The High Court · 2025

1. Dr. Rasik Behari Lal S/o. late K.B. Lal, Aged 52 years, Occ. Doctor, R/o U.S.A, through his GPA Sri. Hemens Roy S/o. Omkar Persad, aged 55 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Opp National Police Academy Shivrampally, Hyderabad 2. Smt. Shardhanjali Roy, Wo. Hemansu Roy, Aged 54 years, Occ: Household RJo. Opp National Police Academy Shivrampally Hyderabad

3. Smt. Pushpanjali Shankar, Wo. Sri Vijay Shankar, Aged 57 years, Occ: Household R/o. B-101, Multi Storeyed Flats Sector-13 R.K.Puram New Dellhi 4. Smt. V.Supraja W/o. V. Kota Reddy, Aged 34 years, Occ: Business R/o. Plot 764, Road No 10 Film Nagar Hyderabad

5. N.Satyanarayana, Sweet House C/o. N.Satyanarayana Sweet House R/o. 6- 2-966/16 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

6. Syed Esa, S/o. Syed Salh C/o. Safa Tea and Snacks R/o. 6-2-966117 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

7. Mohd. Sayeed Sarwar, S/o. late Shaik Fareed C/o. M.S. Associates R/o.6-2- 966/1 8 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

8. N.C.Asthana, C/o. Southern Diamond Products Pvt. Ltd., R/o. 6-2- 9661 161 N 17 Khairtabad, Hyderabad 9 Radhakrishna, C/o. M/s. Saket Marketing (P) Ltd., R/o. 6-2-966/168 Khairtabad

10. Vaila Kishore Kumar S/o Sri Vaila Gowrishankar, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business

11.Smt. Vaila Sandhya Wo Vaila Kishore Kumar, Aged about 54 years, Occ: House hold

12. Sri Vaila Abhilash Kumar S/o Vaila Kishore Kumar, aged about 28 years, Occ: Business

13. Ms. Vaila Sneha D/o Vaila Kishore Kumar, Aged about 26 years, Occ: Student

14. Ms. Vaila Pallavi D/o Vaila Kishore Kumar, Aged about 25 years, Occ. Student All are resrdents of H.No. 6-'1-778 near Municipal Ward offlce, Khairatabad, Hyderabad are impleaded as Respondents No. R 10 to R 14 as per Court order dated 6-9-17 in CCCA.MP..No. 404/17. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Kishore Rai Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Shyam S Agrawal Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri Mohammad Adnan Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: Sri M. Yadagiri Counsel for the Respondents 1 0 to 14: Sri J. Prabhakar QSOSS OBJECTIoNS No. 12102 of 2012 (l.A.No.1 ol 20121 Between: Smt. Pushpanjali Shankar, Wo. Sri Vijay Shankar, Aged 57 years, Occ: Household R/o. B-101, Multi Storeyed Flats Sector-13 R.K.Puram New Dellhi at present H-342 A, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon, 122817, Haryana State ...CROSS OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT No. 3 AND

1. Prembehari Lal, S/0. Late K B. Lal, Aged 55 years, Occ: Business R/0. Flat No 501, 6-2-968 Khairtabad Hyderabail RESPONDENT/APPELLANT

2. Dr. Rasik Behari Lal S/o. late K.B. Lal, Aged 52 years, Occ: Doctor, R/o U.S.A, through his GPA Sri. Hemens Roy S/o. Omkar Persad, aged 55 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Opp National Police Academy Shivrampally, Hyderab'ad 3. Smt. Shardhanjali Roy, Wo. Hemansu Roy, Aged 54 years, Occ: Household R/o. Opp National Police Academy Shivrampally Hyderabad

4. Smt. V.Supraja W/o. V. Kota Reddy, Aged 34 years, Occ: Business R/o. Plot 76A, Road No 10 Film Nagar Hyderabad

5. N.Satyanarayana, Sweet House C/0. N.Satyanarayana Sweet House R/o. 6- 2-966/1 6 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

6. Syed Esa, S/o. Syed Salh C/o. Safa Tea and Snacks R/o. 6-2-966117 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

7. Mohd. Sayeed Sarwar, S/o. late Shaik Fareed C/o. M.S. Associates R/o.6-2- 966/1 8 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

8. N.C.Asthana, C/o. Southern Diamond Products Pvt. Ltd., R/o. 6-2- 9661 161 N 17 Khairtabad, Hyderabad

9. Radhakrishna, C/o. M/s. Saket Marketing (P) Ltd., R/o. 6-2-966/'168 Khairtabad ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: Sri A.K. Narasimha Rao Counsel for the Respondent No. 'l: Sri Kishore Rai Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Shyam S Agrawal Counsel forthe Respondent No. 3: Sri Mohammad Adnan The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR S}IAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA C.C.C.A.No.98 OF 2OO4 CROSS OBJECTIONS No.121O2 of2Ol2 I.A.No. 1 of 2OL2 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the tlo bte Sn Jt shce .t l,hrnor d liumo. Sh.nft/ Learned counsel appearing lor the appellant seeks permission ol this Court to withdraw the present Appeal, as the dispute betu'een the parties has been amicably settled out of the Court and accordingly, the learned counsel had filed a memo on 29.07.2025 to that effect. Learned counsel had further contended that the Cross Objections may also be closed with an observation that the matter has been settled.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents did not dispute the said fact

3. Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and in viei,r' of the withdrawa-l ol the appeal, the Cross Objections are also closed. There shall be no order as to costs. I I I I I I 2 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha-ll stand closed. To, SD/-P.GOWRI SHANKAR DEPUTY REGIST ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Vll Senior Civil Judge. City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (with records, if any) 2. One CC to Sri Kishore Rai. Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sn Mohammad Adnan, Advocate TOPUCI 4. One CC to Sri Shyam S Agrawal Advocate [OPUC] 5, One CC to Sri J. Prabhakar Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri M. Yadagiri, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri A. K. Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies 49 VHTPSL HIGH COURT DATED: 2910712025 COMMON JUDGMENT CGCA.No.98 of 2004 AND Gross Objections No. 12102 of 2012 (l.A.No. 1 of 20121 DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN AND CLOSING THE CROSS OBJECTIONS \0 1 t 11 its ilE o * t