The High Court · 2025

1 The State of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. 2 Dusari Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o H No 'l-6, Agapally Village, Manchal lilandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner/Respondent Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC No.598 o'f 2020 on the file of XVI Metropolitan lrlagistrate Cyberabad at lbrahimpatnam. ... Respondents/Complainant l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be plbased to stay of all further proceedings including enforcement of the orders in CC No 598 of 2020 on the file of XVI Metiopolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at lbrahimpatnam pending the disposal of main petition. CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13604 OF 2024 Between: Teljeri Bala Kishan, S/o Mallaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ,Business, Business, R/o H No 11-1371A, Gokul Nagar, Pachamma Basti lbrahimpatnam, Telangana. ... petitioner/Respondent AND '1. The State of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad 2 Pujari Ya!1gir!, S/o P Lakshmaiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Business, R/o H No 1-40lB-.Agapally Village, Manctial Mandal, Ringa Reddy District Telangana, Represented by his GPA Dusari Laksmai,h, S/o 6ayanna, Aged about 45years, _Occ.,Agriculture, R/o H No 1-6, Agapally Village, Mancha-l Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC in CC No 596 of 2020 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at lbrahimpatnam. ...Respondents/Complainant l.A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including enforcement of the orders in CC No 596 of 2020 on the file of XVt Metropotitan Magistrate Cyberabad at lbrahimpatnam pending the disposal of main petition. CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13585 OF 2024 Between: pq1d4_al.ly-Qantosh, S/o B Gopal Rao, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o H No 22-2-884, Noor Khan Bazaar, Charminar Hyderab-ad, Telangana. ...Petitioner/Respondent AND 1- The State of Telangana, through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana,- Hyderabad.

2. Pujari Yadagiri, S/o P Lakshmaiah, Aged aboul 42 years, Occ. Business, R/o H No 1-4018, Agapally Village, lvtanchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict Telangana, Represented by his GPA Dusari Laksmaiah, S/o Bayanna, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H No 'l-6, Agapally Village, ManchJl Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict. ...Respondents/Complainant 7 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS prayllg that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandu. lf o.uno. of criminat-Pelition, the High court may be oleased to quash tn. cc''u-o.- oo g- o1 2O2O on the file of XVI Metropolitan 'lilagistrate, Cyberbad at lbrahimpatnam' t.A. NO :1OF 2O24 PetitionunderSection528ofBNSSprayinglhatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorand,''li c.o'no' of Criminal-Peiition' the High-Court may be pleased to stay of att turtnJr proceeOings including. enforcement of the orders in CC No 669 of 2020 on it"iif. of XVt Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Iorrr,*p"inr. pending the disposal of main petition' CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 13590 0F 2024 Between: TeliariBalaKishan,s/oMallaiah,Agedabout45years,occ:.Busine-ss'R/oHNo i ifij?"r\'b;i;i N;s;;, FJC["i"'"e'"ti lbrahimpatnam' relangana ...Petitioner/ResPondent AND 1_ The State of Telangana Telangana, HYderabad. , through the Public Prosecutor, High Court of

2.DusariLaksmaiah,s/oBayanna,Agedabout45years,occ:agricultureR/o ' il rG'i 6,')iUrpriiv vir'ii# ri'r-aninal rrltanoal' Rarisa Reddv District .Respondents/ComPlainant Petitionundersection52BofBNSSprayllgthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorandr*'ii e-rnar of Criminal'Petition, the High Court may be oleased to quash the cc in cc No SSZ of 2020 on the file of XVI Metropolitan 'lvlagistrate Cyberabad at lbrahimpatnam l.A. NO: 't oF 2024 PetitionunderSection52BofBNSSpraylngthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memorand,* Ii Oto'nOt of Criminal-Petition the Hiqh Court may be oleased to stay of alt furtnJr p''t"""Olngt including, enforcement of the orders in 'isi-.i ioio on tie"rire ti xir Metropoiitan Masistrate cvberabad at 3;""^,; ioiur'*puinr. pending the disposal of main petition' ThesePetitionscomingonforhearing,.uponperusingtheM-emorandumof arguments of Sri lmmaneni Grounds of Criminal p"t't'onl lnO Rama Rao, Advocate r"r.]i''" E"]itiJ*rs in aliCRLPs and Sri M Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant Public P;;t;;;; "; behalf of the Respondent No'1 in all CRLPs and none appeared for the Respon{"Illl2 in all CRLPs itr" C"r.t made the following: COMMON ORDER neiring 'pon ^the r THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 136O3. 13604. 13585 AND 13590 0F 2024 COMMON ORDER: These Crimina,l Petitions are filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., by the petitioners to quash the proceedings in Crime Nos.598, 596, 669, and 597 of 2O2O, pending on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M.Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 - State. Perused the record.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that there are several disputes in between the parties and the petitioners herein have filed the complaints of cheating against the unofficial respondents, which are pending in the same Court.

4. Since - the transactions are same in all the complaints hled by the petitioners herein and the unofficial respondents, according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is 2 desirable that the cases filed against one another shall be tried together.

5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the attendance of petitioners herein is dispensed with, subject to the following conditions: i) Petitioners shall always be represented by their counsel on record. ii) They shall file an affidavit stating that in their absence, the proceedings conducted by the counsel will not be disputed by them in any manner and shall not dispute their identity also. iii) They sha1l appear before the learned Magistrate as and when their presence is required. In the event of the petitioners failure to appear when the Court directs, this order dispensing their attendance shall stand cancelled.

6. In vicu, of the above, these Criminal Petitions are clisposed ot. The cases are tried together in the event of j chargesheets being laid against these respondents. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, il an_r,, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.SRE ASSIST E NIVASA REDDY NT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To,

1. The XVI Metropolitan Magistrate at Cyberabad '* pv"Af'np^t'rr^-r' - 2. Two CCs to the prOf ic i'"o-s""'ior' Uign Court for the State of Telangana at 3 U,;"cC;dnirrt'ivrnr'rErur RAMA RAo' Advocate [oPUC] 4 Two CD CoPies Hvderabad (OUT) ADKTghfr- HIGH COURT DATED:2410312025 oR THE S l4 t ( 25 ,tuu 76 s(' o o r! -t COMMON ORDER CRLP.Nos.13603, 13604, 13585 AND 13590 OF 2024 DISPOSING OF THE CRLPs . -{.D- -Lco\ .W@ €