✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 20 Dec 2011

M/s. Saritha Synthetics & Industries Ltd., Rajam, Srikakulam District, rep., by its v. The Commercial Tax Officer, Rajam Circle, Vizianagaram Division, Srikakulam District

Writ Petition No. 33475 of 2011SANJAY KUMAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The writ petition is dismissed. The miscellaneous application is also dismissed.

Judgment

Cause title

Between: M/s. Saritha Synthetics & Industries Ltd., Rajam, Srikakulam District, rep., by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Grandhi Eswara Rao, S/o late China Sanyasi Raju, aged about 55 years, R/o. Rajam, Srikakulam District … Petitioner

And The Commercial Tax Officer, Rajam Circle, Vizianagaram Division, Srikakulam District … Respondent

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 33475 OF 2011

ORDER:

(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)

1.

The petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy available under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 to challenge the assessment order. Under the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

Operative part

2.

The writ petition is dismissed. The miscellaneous application is also dismissed.

3.

However, we leave it open to the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedies. 20-12-2011 MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ SANJAY KUMAR, J

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 20 Dec 2011. The bench was SANJAY KUMAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 33475 of 2011). ← Search more judgments