The High Court · 2025

2. Sree Lasya Panyam, Wo Gollapalli Eshwarnath, DiO Srikar Pany?m!|SPq 28 - Veiis,-cio prot tro zziz,-ceethi Nagar, R K puram Post, Malkajgiri, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad - 500056. \ ...ResPondent PetitionunderSection52SofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the Memcirandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may oe pteaseo to quash cc No.2095 ol 2024on the file of ll Junior civil Judge -cum lVMetropolitanMagistrate,Medchal.MalkaigiriDistrict,Hyderabadforthe ,it"g"O oif"n.es 49dA IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibilion Act, in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Sree Lasva Panvam,, W0 Gollapalli Eshwarnath, D/0 Srikar Panyam' Aged ;B i";;;:Rio Pbtii,otiiz. Geeiha Nasar, R K Puram Post, Malkaisiri' Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad - 500056' ...Petitioner/Respondent No'2 in l'A'Nos'2 and 3 oI 2025 AND 9ollapalli, Eshwarnath,. S/o. Ravindranath, Aged 29 \t ars, Rl/o. 3i35, Seva Mandir, Vinayaka Nagar, Kodigenahalli, Hindupur - 51t., 12. Smt Gollapalli Sreevani, Wo. Gollapalli Ravindranet r, Occ. Government Servant, R/o. 3/35, Seva Mandir, Vinayaka Nagar, Korli lenahalli, HinOupui _ 515212 2 ...Respondents/petitioners in l.l\ Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 3 The State of Telangana, Represented through its publc ,rosecutor High Court Buildings Hyderabad. ...RespondenURespondent in l.A. \los.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under section 359(6) of BNSS praying that i the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition he High court may be pleased to permit ,the- De-facto Complainant/Rr-, ,pondJnt No.2 to compromise the matter with the Accused/petitioner for the ir eged offences 4gB- A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry prohibition Act in cc Jo 2095 of 2024 on the file of ll Junior civil Judge- cum lV Metropolitan t/ rgistrate, Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, in terms of the MOU dated 20. 2.2024. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petitron under section 359(2) of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to compromise the matter with the petitioners/Acc .l;ed for the alleged offences 498-4 IPC and sections 3 and 4 of Dowry prohibitror Act in cc.No.2o95 of 2024 on the file of ll Junior civil Judge-cum lV Met r politan Magistrate, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, in terms of the MOU de r.ed 20.12 2024. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing tt e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon .hearing 1l 3 arguments of sri K.SUBBARAJU GUPTA, Advocate for the petitioner an( the sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'l , and of Sri K.Naumene Suraparaj, Advocate for the Responder No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINA L PETITION No.1 3072 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.2095 of 2024 on the file of ll Junior Civil Judge-cum-lV Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal_Malkajgiri District.

2. lt is submifted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present criminar petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compromise and to record the compromise.

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to setfle the matter by ., L-TD. J C p,|3072 2D5 appearing along with their respective counsel before t re High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangar a vlde orders daled 14.10.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretrr y, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by his Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appea'ed before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of - elangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified tl e parties and submitted a report daled 29.10.2025 stating that tlt parties were identified and they have willfully and without any co rrcion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, I.A.Nos-2 and 3 of 2o1'.t are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and tr" : proceedings in C.C.No.2095 ot 2024 on the file of ll Junior Civil Judge-cum-lV Metropolitan Magistrate, tvledchal-Malkajgiri Dist-if, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, are f< reby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused paying an amour'l of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, Hig r Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State ,,f Telangana, 3 ETD, J C p 13072 2025 Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High court Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/. A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR AS ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To, 'l The,ll Junior.Civil Judge - cum - Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, ^ Medchal Malkajgiri District Uppal at Uppat. 2. The Station House Officer, Uppal WpS'police Station, Rachakonda. 3 Two CCs to the pubtic prosebirtor, High Court for the Stai;;i i;ta;gana at 4 One CC to SRI K.SUBBARAJU GUpTA Advocate tOpUCl 5 One CC to SRt K.NAUMENE SURAPARAJ, Advocite tOp'UCI 6. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] (Along with copy of Joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs 10,0004 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by sri K.Naumene Suraparaj, counsel for the petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 07.11.202s as Rs.s,000i- (Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, at Hyderabad, Rs.5,000/_ (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association Highcurt Buildings Hyderabad, and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.1345gl of 2025. NVB/Sa HIGH COURT DATED:0711112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And GRLP.No.13072 ot 2025 t':j I- 'i,'1i6 a,) F_ d o 'j- ( i1 r\ F I * I ,l I-l (, / .,!,. ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION ,\ND l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 2025 q. '. N 2l MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC PETTTION (UNDER StrC' 320 (6) oF Cr'P'C') IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE {II]DERABAD THE STATE OF TBLAiTLO*O O*, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FOR I.A.No CRL'P'No' IN oF 2025 oF 2025 r BETWEEN: 1. GotlaPalli Eswarnath' S/O RavindranaLh' *i6 ITai Seva Mandir' Vinavaka Nagar' Kodigenahalli' H induPu r - rtrztL I Smt CollaPalli Sreevan i -' ivTo coluPalli Ravindranarh ' Occ: Government Servant' ii^ ii.s Scva Mandir' Vinayaka Nagar' iiio't*J"J"t', HinduPur - s1s2t2 VtrRSUS

1. The State of Telangana ' 'o"'rl""".t"d through its Public Prosecutor Uigtr Court Buitdings HYderabad

2. Sree LasYa PanYam ' - wlo GoilaPalli Eswarnath' n /o Sreckar Panyam' Aged 3O Years' nio 0,", No 7 212' Geerha Nagar' R K hrram Post' ;;il"j;i; Medchal-Malkaj giri District' HYderakrad - 500056 ..Petitioners Respondents I ../E o 22 JOINT MEMO That the Petitioners/ Accused an( Complainant/ Respondent No. 2 herein have compronL the court as per the terms mentioned in the attached lr' to further proceed with the case in for the alleged o:I SecLions 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in CC No 2r) of II Junior Civil Judge - Cum IV Metropolitan Malkangiri District, Hyderabad, in terms of the MOU c I such this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record tl.r between the Petitioner /Accused and De facto Complarr 2 and quash the proceedings against the petitioner,/rr alleged offences 498-4 IPC ar-rd Sections 3 and 4 of Dr r CC No 2O95 of 2024 on the hle of II Junior Civil Judge - Magistrale, Medchal MaJkangiri District. Hydcrabad, i dated 2O DEC 2024. the De-facto- ied the malter out of )U, they do not want rnces 498-4 IPC and' ,5 of 2024 on tl e hle {agistrate, Medchal- ted 20 DEC 2024 as r Comprise accorded ant/ Respondent No. cused in for thc the ry Prohibition Act in lum IV iVletropolitan r terms of the MOU Hence This Memo. 1. Gollapalli Eswarnath,

2. Smt Gollapalli Sreevani

3. Sree Lasya Panyam, -r& Sr.r- - '^-: Petitioners \...2nd Re pondent COUNSEL FO]T IHE PETITION RSi &^ ACCUSED U L FOR THE COMPLAINANT/ IESPONDENT NO. 2 Hyderabad, L)t6l>l ",, I i