✦ High Court of India · 22 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 22 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
22 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,354 words

14. M. Anjaneyulu, S/o. tV. Kotaiah, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Vlllage Servant of Chintakunta (V), Pangal Mandal, Permanent Address H.No.1-43, Kethepally Village, Pangal [r,4andal, Wanaprathy District. 15. K. Ramulu, Sio. Pedda Pullaiah, Aged about years. Occ. Vi lage Servant of Bushireddypally (V), Pangal (M), Permanent Address H.No.1-108, Bushireddypally Village, Pangal Mandal, Wanaparthy District. '16. P. Srinivasulu, S/o. Buggappa, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Village Servant of p.tkoor (V and IV), Permanent Address H.No.4-61l2, Boyapatty (V), I\rla ha bubna ga r U rba n [\rlandal and District. AND .,.PET|TTONERS [\,4ahabubnagar Drstrict. Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad Nampally Station Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 500001

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to lhe Government, 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Opposite Annapurna Hotel, 3. The District Collector, Mahabubnagar, Office of the Collectorate, 4. The Tahsildar, Bijnapally Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, 5. The Tahsildar, Ghanapur Mandal, Wanaprathy Distrrct, 6. The Tahsildar, Weepengandla Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 7. The Tahsildar, Pebbair [Mandal, Wanaparthy.District. 8. The Tahsildar, Pangal Mandal, Wanaparthy District. 9. The Tahsildar, Kosgi Mandal, l\rlahabubnagar District. 10. The Tahsildar, Utkoor [\,4andal, It/ahabubnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction. (i)Declaring the impugned Proceedings bearing No A71427312009 dated 23.03.2018 issued by Respondent No. 3 directing the termination oI the service of the Petitioners and limiting the arrears of salaries payable to them only up to 30.04.2012, as being illegal, arbitrary, uncon stitutional, in violation of the principles of natural justrce and in violation of Articies 14 and 21 of the conslitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the same. (ii)Con seq uen y, set aside lhe termrnation proceedings bearing Rc.No. A/168412004, dai.ed Nil.1t).20.18, Rc.No. Hl120712018, dated Nii.06.2018, Rc.No. Bl191Bl2O16, dated O7-09-2018, Rc.No.B/7973120'19. dated Nil-'10-2018, Rc.No.B/47l2019, dated.lg-01-2019, Rc.No.A1127212018, dated Nil-06-2018, and Rc.No.A/436212008 dated 29.06.2019 issued to the Petitioners by the Respondents No. 4 to 10. and (iii)Consequen y, to drrect the Respondents to continue the petitioners in the post of Village Revenue Assistant where they were working earlier, or any other post to which other individuals working as village Revenue Assistant may be absorbed, with all -;F,:-- consequential benefits and arso to direct the respondents to pay arrears of sarary r honorarium and other service benefits from 30.4.2012 tiil date. lA NO: 1 OF 2O23 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in pleased to the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be suspend the Proceedings bearing A7l42Z3l2OOg, dated 23.03.2018 issued by Respondent No. 3 and the consequentiar termination proceedings issued by the Respondents No. 4 to .10 to the petitioners and consequently permit the Petitioners to continue working in the post of Village Revenue Assistant where they were working earrier with afl consequenuar benefits pending disposar of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REDDy Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER ,i t l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITI ON No.3281a of 2023 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, the Writ petition is disposed of 2) Aggrieved by the action of respondents in terminating the services of the petitioners, the present Writ petition is filed. 3) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents. 4l When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the 1is raised in the present Writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated o3.1o-2o23 passed in w.p. No.31901 of 201g. Learncd counsel has further submitted that since VRA System is abolished, suitable direction may be given to the respondents to take appropriate decision on the re-engagement of the petitioners. 5) The above made submission is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. \ I l 2 PK,J u,p 32818-2023 In view of the above and for the reasons alike in the order 6) dated 03. lO.2O23 passed in W.P. No.31901 of 2018, the impugned proceedings bearing No.A7 1427312OO9, dated

23.03.2018, issued by respondent No.3 is set aside, insofar as the petitioners are concerned, and respondent No' 1 is directed to take appropriate decision on the re-engagement of the petitioners, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7l Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed' Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSIS TANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To 1 2 3

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. L 10 11 12 .12 The Principal Secretary to the Government, Revenue Department' Secretariat' Hvderabad. State of Telanaana ifr ; ch6lt;;;siionei oY t-ana Administration, opposite Annapurna Hotel' Namoallv Station Road, Abids, Hyderabad - 50000'1 in" 6idiii"t'C"it"ctor, Irrlahabubnlgar, Office of the Collectorate. N/ahabubnagar District. ine Tahsildar. Biinaoallv Mandal, Nagarkurnool District, The Tahsildar, Ghariapur Mandal, Wanaprathy District- ine fJr',rsirorr, Weepengandla Mandal, Wanaparthy District. The Tahsildar, Pebdair Mandal, Wanaparthy District The Tahsildar, Pangal trrlandal, Wanaparthy Drstrict' The Tahsildar, Kosdi Mandal, Mahabubnagar District' The Tahsildar, Utkoior Mandal, Ir/ahabubnagar DistricL^ on" cbio sdt c.RAJA SEKHAR REDDY' Advocate tgPUCl- - il; 6C.L-Gi Fon sEnvtcEs-|, High Court for the state of Telangana' at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies -. . ^ PSK, GJP $ HIGH COURT DATED:2210112025 ORDER WP.No.32818 of 2023 HE STAT 1 G. 4' .:) t) [ 6 Fits 2025 o -\ * FA.ICP rO 4 * ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS a G)qw

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments