The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Through the Public Prosecutor, Of the High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Smt. Patel Shalini, Wo. Vinay Kumar, Aged aboul2T years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. H No 15-113/384, Sri Balaji Homes, Badangpet Village, Balapur Mandal, R.R. District Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 3556 of 2019 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar. ...RESPONDENTS ,7 l.A. NO: 'l OF 2024 Between: Smt. Patel Shalini, Wo Vinay Kumar, Aged about 27 yearc, Occ. House Wife, R/o. H No. 15-1 1 3/384, Sri Balaji Homes, Badangpet Village, Balapur Mandal, R.R. District ...PETITIONER AND '1. The State of Telangana, Through the Public Prosecutor, Of the High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Patel Sri Vinay Kumar, S/o. Srinivas, Aged about 41 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. H.No. 8-153, New Mythripuram, Jillelguda Village, Balapur Mandal, R.R. District

3. Patel Srinivas Jayalakshmi, Wo. Srinivas, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Private Employee, Rio. H.No 8-153, New Myhripuram, Jillelguda Village, Balapur Mandal, R.R. District

4. Patel Srinivas, S/o. Badraiah, Aged about 77 years, Occ. Retired Employee, R/o. H.No. 8-153, New Myhripuram, Jillelguda Village, Balapur Mandal, R.R. District

5. Patel Srinivas Varun, S/o Srinivas, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. H No 8-153, New Myhripuram, Jillelguda Village, Balapur Mandal'RR District ...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition. the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to compound the offences and Consequently quash the charge sheet in CC No 3556 of 2024 on the file of the Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, At L.B Nagar. LA. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between both parties and allow the and quash the proceedings in CC No. 3556 of 2024 on the file of the Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, At L.B Nagar This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing lhe Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri R. Sushanth Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and of Sri Sujith Jaiswal, Advocate for the Respondent l.lo.2, The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER j i i l I I I IION'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JTIWADI SRIDEVI I.A.Nos.l and? of 2O24 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.13644 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.3556 of 2019 on the file of VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 4984, 324 rlw 34 of IPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the ollences.

3. Vide order dated 26.12.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court I I 2 for the State ofTelangana, Flyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legat Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 31.12.2024 and the same is placed on record.

5. In view of the above, I.A.Nos. I and 2 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 in C.C.No.3556 of 2019 on the file of VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications,, il any pending, shall stand closed. \ //TRUE COPY'/ Sd/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTA T REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 0 1 The Vl Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, At L B. Nagar.

2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Rachakonda District. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad[OUT]

4. One CC to Sri R. Sushanth Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Sujith Jaiswal, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (along with the copy of memo of compromise) Plp/gh HIGH COURT DATED:0310112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2024 IN/AND CRLP.No.13644 ot 2024 2fi P l i i i I ALLOWING THE CRL.P. AND BOTH THE lAs \ !> IN TIIE IIIGTI coURT . STATE oFTELANGANA -I_OIarrE AT HYDERABAD I.A. No.J of 2024 /In cRLPNolJLqgoF 2024 Between: lTl.,r?,o slgini,wo. vrnay Kumar, Aged about 27 years, Occ: House Wife, f/o, H.No. ts-tt3/384, Sri Bataji Homes, Badangpet Village, Balapur Mandaf, n.ft.'Oi.t i.t i . ...Petitioner ^ ^^'; ^11"lfi h", !"*, sro. s.i#l, i,::",i$::"11J,ff#ilffi g'o'',;., Jrllelgudavilage, Balapur Mandal, R.R. Oistrict . , . 2.. P.atel Srinivas Jayalakshmi, Wo. Srinivas, Aged_ about 70 years, Cicc: private Em;.:;;; "", Y.9..H.ryo, A-t jS; I.rew Myhripurum, JillelgudaVilage, Balapur Mandal, RR. District . 3. Patel lrinivas, S/o. Badraiah, Aged about 77 yeus, Occ: Retired bmployee, |l.9..rf.Uo. 8-153, New Myhnpu*r, '--, --' JillelgudaVilage, nAapur Mandal, Rh. District r,n VaruL S/o. Srinivis, "|.flinivas ^ ^!., Aged about 36 years. Occ: private Em;,l6ysg, ll.9.tt No. 8-153, New Myhnpuram, JillelgudaVilage, Balapur tvtanial, R. R. O istrict * 5. The State ofTelangana, 1T9u4 n. public hosecutor, Of the High Court at Hyderabad. AFFTD AVIT . . . Respondents I, Smt. Patel Shalini, Wo. Vnay Kunrar,Aged about2Tyears, Occ: House Wife, R/o. H.No. l'-ll3l3g4, Sri Balaji Hornes,Badangpet Village, Balapur Mandal, R'R' Distict ', do hereby solemnly affirm and si,cerely srate on oath as follows: t*' f.s Y^a; ) /tz*'t1^, ,{ l.) \ d I \ \:. I I submit rhat I am the petitioner herein as such.I am we acquainted with t\ the facts of the case and able to depose as under. 2' I submit that the above criminal petition is frred by the Respondents/ Ar to ,{4 seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No. 3556 of 2019 on the file of the \lI Additional Mehopolitan lr{agishate, Ranga Reddy District, At L.B. Nagar for the offence under Section 49g(A) and 324 read with S. 34 of Indian penal Code. 3' That due to the intervention of elders and welr-wishers, the petitioner and the respondents entered into compromise and agreed to settle the disputes out of Court. That the parties hereto have resolved the differences among themselves and agreed to settle their diiTerences on the following terms:

4. That in view of the settlemenl bcth the parties have mutually agreed that rhe Respondent No. t itralt pay a sum ofRs.l0,00,000/_ (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) to the petitionertowards all her past, presenr & future claims including but not limited to marriage expenses, Permanent lifetime alimony and fi:ture maintenance as full and one tirne final settrement of matrimonial dispute and both the panies shaU exchange gold ornaments and other articles as mentioned in Annexure-l & II of the Memorandum of Compromise Deed.

5. That the Respondent No. I shall also pay the minor daughter, Baby Hanvitha an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/_ which will be held as a fixed deposit. The Respondent No. I shall no longer be tiable or responsible for any educational, medical or and any financial expenses of the minor child and the petitioner after the financial settlement between both the parties. 6 l'hat the petitioner no.r and the Respondent No. 2 has obtained mutual divorce in FCOp No. 2193 of 20lg on the file of principal Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar: "^/X r,s \ Tfr"o; lt)"^V \ d, 2-t:-

7. That the petitioner and Respondeat No. I have already Compromised in all other connected matters of M.C. 263 of 20l9and G.W.O.p 25 of 2019 on the file of the Hon,ble principal Family Court, Ranga Reddy District. ^ E' That both the parties hereby agree to withdraw the cases unconditionalry. Thereforq it is prayed that this Hon'bre court may be preased to record the compromise between both partiei and airow th" uuor" quash petition incc No. 3556 of 2024 on the file of the W Additional Metropoliran Magistrare, Ranga Reddy District At L'B' Nagar and by compounding the same in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Ilon,bre may deem fit and proper in the circurnstances ofthe case. r.t,fftr Respondent/Accused No. I I Ps"&-U<4or,,^, Respondenr/Accused Nol 2 /rPto Respondent/Accused No. 3 J,.#mrffi, Resp Couns pondent Place: Hydeyabad our.-, oS lil/lr/ d Petitioner rId Counsel for petitioner