High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned Proceedings No. 1570/1 dated 18-3-2010 issued by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice, equity and fair play anfl consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue aE copyist of the basis of promotion orders issued in order daled 27-3-200E with all conseqqential benefits. .ra l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 14219 OF 2010 I Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the rlircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings No.15-20/1 dated 19.3.2010 issued by the Principal district & sessions Judge, tvledak at sangareddy pending disposal of the main writ petrtion. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN, SC FOR TSHC RIT PETITION No: 11161 O F 10 Eetween: J Rajender Reddy" S/o Late Jagga Reddy aged about 44 years, Occ: Bailiff (Promoted Junror Assistant) Senior Civil Judge Court, Sanfa Reddy, Medak District. AND 1 2 The Principal Drstrict and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy The Registrar (Admn ), High Court of Andhra pradesh, tlyderabgfl. ,..PETITIONER ...RESPONOENTE Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances statect in the affidavit filed therewith, the flig6 eourt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, more particularly one ir the natqre ef wri! of mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings No. 1565/2 dated ig.03.2010 lssued by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak, Sanga Reddy as illegal, arbitrary. unrust and subversive of Articres 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution besides being opposed to all principles of natural justice, equity and fatr play and conseq rently hold that the petitioner is entiflec to continue as junior Assistant of the basis of promotion orders issued in order caled 27.03.2008 with all consequentia I benefits. l.A. NO: 1 OF 201o(WPMP . NO: 14220 OF 2010) Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances state! in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High coL rt may be pteased to SuspendtheoperationoftheimpugnedproceedingsNo.l565i2datedlS.03.20l0 issued by the Principal District &Sessions Judge, Medak, Sanga Reddy pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA CqunselfoltheRespondents:SRIBATHULARAJKIRAN'SeFqBTSHC WRIT ETITION O:11 178 0F 2010 Between:

1. Md. Shamsheer Ali, S/o AhmaQ AIL aged about 45 yqqr$, pcc:. Copyist ' i'pi"mli"ljtvi,rO,'Si.i"r Oiui[iuds" couil, Sansa Reddv, Me{g! Distrtct 2. T.Venkateswarlu, S/o Fitchaiah, aged about 4? years' Qcc: Copylst ' (promoled typist), seijo,'ii;li:';d'9"bl-''t' 2lr'"1'd5"0' Medak Distriqt ' ' ' , ...FEriloNERQ ANP 1 2 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sanga Reddy The Registrar (Admn), High Court of A P Hyderabad' ,..RESPONDENTS Fetitiqn un(er Article 216 ot t\e Constitution of lndia Prayillg 1661 in lhg circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therqwith, the High Qqurt may be pleasedtoi$sueanappropriateWritmoreparticulqrlyoneinthenalureqfWB|T oF MANDAMUS declaring the impugnqd Proceedingg uo't!94/1 datqd 18-3-2Q10 issued by the Principal Dislrict and Sessionq Judge' Mg{ak ?t Salga Reddy as illggal, arpitraly, unjsst alq gubyers!ve 9f Artioles 14' 1-6 9nd ?'! Constitution hesides beilg opposed lq all Brinciplgp of natural justipg' equity and fairplayandconsequentlyholdthatthepetitionerisenlitledtocontinueasTypist of the basis of prgmotion Qrders issued in order daled 27-3:2Q08 with all consequential benefits. .of Coqnsel for the Petitioners: SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVEIA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN' Sc FoR TsHc WRIT PETITION NO: 13710 OF 2Q10 Between: Kommu Naqarah, S/o. Balaiah, aged about 40 years, Occ: Copyist (Promoted Junior Assritant) Junior Civil Judge Cou(, Narayankhed Medak District' ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sarrga Reddy The Registrar Admn). High Court of A P , Hyderab?d. ,..RE9PONDENTS Petitiqn under Article 226 of the ConstitutiQn of lnd a prayinq that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High Qsurt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more pq(icularly one in the nature gf Writ qf Mandamus declaring the impugned Proceedings No, 15€15/2 deted 18'3-2018 issued by the Princrpal Distrrct and $essions Judge, Medak Sanga Reddy aE illegal, arbitrary, unJust and subversive of Articles 14, '16 and 21 of the the congtitution besides being opposed to all principles of natl ral juslice, equity and fair play and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Juniar. Assistant of the basrs of promotion orders issued in older dated 27'7-2Qp8 with all conseq uential benef its .A. NO: 1 OF 2010 WPMP. NO: 17280 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstence$ statgd in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High Ccurt may bg pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Proceedings No. 1565/2 dated 18-3-2Q1Q lssued by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Medak Sanga Reddy pending disposal of the main writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAI\, SC FOR TSHC The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER t') THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA WRIT PETITION Nos.l 1 16O 11161 11178 & 13710 0F 2010 COMMON ORDER'. @er ltot1.'bLe sri Justice p.Sam Kosha) Today, when these matters were taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners in these batch of writ petitions by efflux of time have retired from their services and therefore, the cause in these writ petitions became infructuous.

2. Recording the above made submission, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-N. SRIHARI A SI ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// EC N OFFICER To,

1. One CQ to SRI SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA, Advocate [oPUC] 2. OneCC to SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN, SC FOR TSHC [OPUCI !. Two CD CoPies B9R BS w l I I HIGH COURT DATED: 0610312025 I 1 Y'i ii , li, ,,cl ( e,o o 2 1 Ai'f, 20[ s( COMMON ORDER wP.Nos.1i160, '.11161,11178 & 13710 ()f 2010 '9IJA '' Oi. r-'( ' DISMISS!NG ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i : I i I I i I l i I