✦ Telangana High Court

M/s, Castle Containers v. (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad

K SARATH4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Judgment

M/s.Sri Veda lnfra, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Jaldu Nagasri, Wo. Jaldu Venkata Sanath Kumar, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Housewife, R!/o.Plot No.17, Vitis Villa, Doolapally Road, Kompally, Ranga Reddy District - 500014. Suneet Singh, S/o. Ranjeet Singh, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Rt/o. Plot No.73, Gruhalakshmi Colony, Kakaguda, Secunderabad - 500015. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in entertaining the registrations of documents presented by the unofficial respondents premises bearing (OId Nos.B6 and 1-1-47 to 1-1-58 and 1-1-58/1 to '1-1-58/6 and 'l-1-47158i9) New M.C.H. No.1-1-47 to 57 admeasuring 2394 sq.yards situated at Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad without the consent of the -7 petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent6 not to entertain any registrations in respect of the premises bearing (Old Nos.86 and 1- 1-47 to 1-l-58 and 1-1-SBl1 to'l-1-58/6 and 1-1-47158/9) New lV.C.H. No.1-1-47 to 57 admeasuring 2394 sq.yards situated at Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad without the authorization of the petitioner. tA NO: 1 0F 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to entertain any registrations in respect of the premises bearing (Old Nos.86 and 1-1-47 to 1-1-58 and 1-1-58/'l to 1-1-58i6 and 1-1-47158/9) New M.C.H. No.1-1-47 to 57 admeasuring 2394 sq.yards situated at Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad without the authorization of the petitioner, pending finalization of the Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Between:

1. M/s.Sri Veda lnfra, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Jaldu Nagasri, Wo. Jaldu Venkata Sanath Kumar, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Housewife, Rt/o.Plot No.17, Vitis Villa, Doolapally Road, Kompally, Ranga Reddy District - 500014.

2. Suneet Singh, S/o. Ranjeet Singh, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Rl/o. Plot No.73, Gruhalakshmi Colony, Kakaguda, Secunderabad - 500015. ...PET{TIONER/RESPONDENT No.5&6 AND

1.

Tie State of Ttlangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2.

The District Collector, Hyderabad District.

3.

The District Registrar, Stamps and Registrations, Hyderabad District.

4.

The Sub-Registrar, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS 5. M/s. Castle Containers, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Mohammed Zia Baig alias Abdul Zin Baig, S/o. late Abdul Sattar Baig, Aged aboutTT years, Occ. Business Rlio. Suite 8-6, Golden Sands ll, 42, Huda Heights, R-oad No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 34. .RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pledsed to vacate the interim order granted in W.P. No. 30905 of 2O24, dated 11-11-2024. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FoR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER ---------7 THE I{ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH IVRIT PETITI ON No.3O9O 5 of 2024 ORDER: Sri Narendar Jalli, Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated 25.04.2025 in the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Operative part

2. Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. V. HARI PRASAD REGISTRAR DEPUTY SECTI ON OFFICER To, I

1. One CC to SRI NARENDAR JALLI, Advocate. [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies. BSK GJP HIGH COURT DATED:3010412025 oi l i r (.- -i.{ ),, .i; .-dD .\s ".\ lrcit-t + ./ ORDER WP.No.30905 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS hl u'

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Registration Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments