M/s. Bhavani Transformers Pvt. Ltd v. The Commissioner of Customs & Central
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals – II), 7th Floor, Central Revenue Building, L.B. Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad – 500 004 and others. …………… PETITIONER ……………… RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT…
Judgment
Sri Venkateshwara Co-op Industrial Estate, IDA, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, represented by its Director, Smt. P. Padma. And
The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals – II), 7th Floor, Central Revenue Building, L.B. Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad – 500 004 and others. …………… PETITIONER ……………… RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 7184 OF 2005 ORDER: (per Sri B. Sudershan Reddy, J) The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals – II), vide the impugned order dated 25-02-2005, dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner herein against the order in Original C.Ex.No. 4o of 2004 in O.R No. 122/2002-Adjn dated 13-07-2004 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad – IV for noncompliance of the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short ‘the Act’). The facts disclose that the petitioner made all possible efforts to comply with the requirement of deposit of amounts as is required under the provisions of Section 35F of the Act but could not do so on account of sad and sudden demise of the Managing Director of the Company. Be that as it may, the petitioner pursuant to the directions of this Court deposited Rs. 5,50,000/- with the respondents and altogether deposited an amount of Rs.8,50,000/- as against Rs.14,00,000/-. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we consider it appropriate to direct the appellate authority to hear and dispose of the appeal on merits without insisting for any further payment under Section 35F of the Act. The appeal shall be heard and disposed of within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
12..08..2005 (B. Sudershan Reddy, J) (Ramesh Ranganathan, J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Companies Act, 2013.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 12 Aug 2005. The bench was B SUDERSHAN REDDY, RAMESH RANGANATHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.