Tiie High Court · 2025

2. Gali Sai Laxmi,, Wo. Srinivasa Redd , Aged 40 H.No. 19-366/'1, Telangana. nant) Colony,

3. a Gali Nag Student, R/o. H. Kothagudem, Telangana. 1 rs, Occ. Labourer, R/o. , Bhadradri Kothagudem, 1 yea6, Occ. rachalam, Bhadradri ...RespondenWictim Petition under Sectaon 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to quash the criminal proceedings against the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 2 & 3 in Crime No. 232 ot 2O25 dated '10.09.2025 of P.S. Bhadrachalam Town, Bhadradii Kothagudem District for offences u/s: 1 1 5(2), 296(b); 126(2); r/w. 3(5) of BNS and pass such other order or olders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest oi justice. .,:: ,,it. ;...

1. Gali Sai Laxmi,. Wo. Srinivasa H.No. 19-3-66/1, Telangana. Colony, 40 Occ. Labourer, R/o. KothaEudem, ..Petitioner Respondent l{o.2/De-facto Complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2OZS

2. D 21 Occ. , Bhadnadri ...Pe8tionerlRespondenwactim ln l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

1. Ihe Sqtg of Telangana,, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. ...RespondenURespondent No.lrComplainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

2. Rao, 24 years, Occ. Student.. R/o. .Bhadradri Kothagudern - ...Respondent lPetitioner No.l/Accused No.2 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 3: Palli Rajkumar, H.No.1'3-1-42, Ayyappa Colony, 5071 I 1. S/o. Palli 25 years, Occ. Student, Rlo. Bhadradri Kothagudem - (Accused No.s) ...Res pondenUPetitioner !{o.2/Accused No.3 in l.A.Nos.2 and Z ot 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS prayirg that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners/ Respondent Nos.2 & 3 to compound the offenoes in the above criminal petition and.quash the Crime No:232 of 2025, dated 10.09.2025 on the file of P.S. Bhadrachalam Town, against the Acqused Nos.2 & 3 by compounding the offence in terms of eompromise in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the oompromise in'the above criminal petition and quash the Crime No. 232 of 2O25, dated 10.09.2025 on the file of P.S. Bhadracha{am Town. against the Accused Nos. 2 & 3 by compounding the offence in terms of compromise in the interestof justice. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri SHAIKH MOHAMMED Rla /AN AKHTAR, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramatla, Additionat Public Prosecutor on beha{f of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri Sri Naresh Verma, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. The Court made the following: COMMON OROER TFI€ HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EAOA l.A.Nos.2 n 30 n 25 CRIMINAL PETITION No.1.28zsoF 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.232 ot 2025 on the file of tshadrachalam Town Police Station, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, registered for the offences under Sections 115(21, 296(b) and 126(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNS').

2. Heard Sri S.M. Rizwan Akhtar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.l-State and Sri B. Naresh Verma, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners- accused Nos.2 and 3 as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3 that during pendency of the present Criminal. Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to permit respondent Nos.2 and 3 to compound the offences and to compromise the matter. )\ \ 2 ETDJ Cd.P.i.lo. 12t75 of 2025

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said oompromise petition.

5. Perused the affidavit filed by respondent No.3-victim in l.A.No.3 of 2O25, which discloses that he has willingly consented for comprornise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, vide .order, dated 06.10.2025, passed by this Court.

6. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Commiftee for the Stat,e of Telangar-ra and the Secretary of the above said Committee has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 15.10.2025, stating that the parties were identified and they have wilfully and without any ibercion entered into compromise.

7. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.232 of 2025 on the file of Bhadra"t"t", Town Police Station, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, against the petitioners- 3 ETD.J C.l.P.No.l2t75 of2025 accused Nos.2 and 3 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners_ accusqd Nos.2 and 3 paying an amount of Rs.5,000A (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services ,: C-ommittee, High Court fsr the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director; Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the sarRe before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed /,TRUE COPY/' SD'- L. VIJAYA LAXMI AsstsrANT REGISTRAC G SECTION OFFICER To, ,l t & lff'r:&1"#ouse offtcer, Bhadrachalam Town Potice station, Bhadradri lY,3"?a,?,l"rffiPublic Prosecutor, Hish court forthe.srate of retangana at 3. One CC to SRt SflAIKH MOHAMMED RtUr/AN AKHTAR, Adraocate [OpUC] i. One CC to SRt NARESH VERMA, Advocate [O"U"1 " Iy3"ffii:r?y;t:85[o%tfi""o*, Hish court ror the state or 6. Two CD Copies (Along with copy of JOint Memo is enclosed here\ rith) Note: Totat Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Shaikh Mohammed Riarvan Akhtar, Counsel fo. tt" p"iitton", "" directed by the Hon,ble Court vide order dated 27.10.2025 at Rs.S,000t ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the .Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and ftled Memo as proof of oompliance USR No.126810 of2OZS. NVB/psl HIGH COURT DATEDi27nAn025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S I CRLP.N:o.12875 of 2025 flr. ) 'tl

1.. -) O g JAN ?028 i 0 * ALL0WING Tr$E GRIM|NAL pETtiloN AND J.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 4 {t/ ..i'.: -'i j "il .::: ',., '.,: OF TELANGANA AT . -..'.:... ( :.' t. :r ". /'1 It is theref6re'prayed that this Hon'bre court may be pleased to recqrd the comprornfse in the abgve crlminal petition and quash the crinr_e No. 232 0f 2025, *;t"a t0.0g.2025 0n the flle of P-s. Bhadracharam Town, against thciAccused Nos. 2.& 3 by compounding the offenoe in terms of compromise in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may t. , deem fit and propei in the circumstances of the case. Hence, this Joint Memo HYDERABAD DATE: 23.09.2025 o (q' f-fE Counsel for PetitionerV ttM4 Accused {-^ ht 3(avrA_ Counsel for ffiondent Nos.2 & 3 /.il)^W 2OSN 3