The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, through - The SHO' Women P.S West Zone' Hi";J;d,-Rep. bi tt. proriJ Prosecutor' High court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad . '.ResPondent No' 1/ComPlaina nt Ms. Thatipalli Pooja' Wo. Avinash Mitta, D/o' Thatipalli Devaiah' Aged 32 velr., O"". Pvt. Employee, R/oH No' 1411t90t4.45iT-1' Sai Brundavan Borabanda, Hvderabad - 500018' ffiileritJ, 'crvrinl -'rGgrt, ...Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to quashtheproceedingsinC.C.No.S2gTof2025onthefileoftheXlllAdd|tional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally' l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Between: tvls Thatipalli PooJa.. Wo Avinash Mitta, D/o. Thatipalli Devaiah, Aged 32 years, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o H No. 14111901445n1, Sai Brundavan Apartments, Gayathri Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad - 500018. AND ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 in both l.A.Nos. 1&2of 2025

1. The State of Telangana, Hyderabad, Rep by the Telangana at Hyderabad. through - The SHO, Women P.S. West Zone, Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of ...Respondent No.1/Respondent No.1 in both l.A.Nos.1&2of 2025

2. Mr. Avinash Mitta, S/o Dr. M Chandra Shekar Shetty, Aged 32 years, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o H.No.8-1-301/96, Laxmi Nagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad - 500008, (Husband of Defacto-Complainant)

3. Mrs Ralya Laxmi [t/itta, Wo. Dr. M. Chandra Shekar Shetty, Aged 52 years, Occ. Homemaker, R/o H.No 8-1-301/96, Laxmi Nagar Colony, Shaikpet Nala, Hyderabad - 500008; ([\4other-in-law of Defacto-Complainant) ...Respondent Nos. 2 &3/Petitioners in both l.A.Nos . 1 & 2 ot 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitroner herein/Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant to compound the offences agarnst the Respondent Nos 2& 3/Petitioners/Accused Nos. I & 2 by allowrng the Cnminal Petition by the proceedings in C.C. 8297 of 2025 on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally. LA. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) r/w 359(8) & 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated rn the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise entered by the Petitioner herein/ Respondent No.2/ Defacto-Complainant with the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 / Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 & 2 and quash the proceedings in C.C. 8297 of 2C25 on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Anuradha Cherukuri,AdvocateforthePetitionersandSriJithenderRaoVeeramalla,the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1 and of Sri Lingampally Venugopal, Advocate for the Respondent No' 2' The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEV]EADA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2025 in/and CRIMINAL P ETITION No.12846 ot 2025 COMMON ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & Z in C.C.No.8297 of 2025, on the file of the leamed Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-4 and 506 of lpC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.2/de facfo complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to compound the offences and to record compromise between both the parties.

3. The learned Additional Public prosecutor has opposed the compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to seftle the matter by -\ 1 ETD. J Crlp-12816-2025 appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vlde orders dated 06.10.2025 passed by this Court' Thereafter, the Secretary' High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to identify the parties and submit a repo( to that effect.

5.PursuanttotheabovesaiddirectionissuedbythisCourt'the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 13.10.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion' entered into compromlse ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed'

6. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.8297 of 2025, on the file of the learned Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos'1 & 2 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association' Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the ./ 3 ETD. J Crtp 12846-2025 High court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (t SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally. 2 The Station House Officer, WPS, West Zone Police Station, Hyderabad City' 3 Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 One CC to Sri Anuradha Cherukuri, Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to Lingampally Venugopal, Advocate [OPUC] 6 Two CD Copies Along with a copy of Joint lt/lemo of Compromise) NOTE: Total Amount of Rs 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Srr Anuradha Cherukuri, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vrde order daled 2410.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No 24744 of 2026, dated 26-02-2026 Sa/PSI s \ HIGH COURT DATED: 2411012025 ORDER l.A.Nos, 1 and 2 ol 2O2S IN/AND CRLP.No.12846 of 2025 , t (i5'- t r-j v 73 IIAfr ?06 z o.\ t o *r) '!iTCH ALLOWING THE t.A.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2O2S AND CRLP. &e o HIGH COURT FOR THB STATE OF TELANGANA AI HYDERABAD I.4,. No. { of 2025 crt.p.No.)JE\,ot2025 (/o BETWDEN: Ms. ThatiPalli Pooja' *i". n*"Lrt Mitta' D/o' Thatipalli Devaiah' 'i""'alZYears, Occ: Pvt' EmPloYec ti" ";i l: ;ilil *;t"'. eo'uuundu' Hvderabad 5000 I 8' ltiorqqsrt-t 'lai Bruntlara. Apartments' ';r - ...Petitioner/Respondent No'2 AND

1. The State ofTclano2na' throuqh the SHO, Women p-'S' IT Corridor' Gachibowli ;;.;;;n" Public Prosecurcr' lligh court i.r'#tt"t" of relangana at Hyderabad' spondent No.1/ Respondent No' I "^ 2- Mr' Avinash Ntitta' ' .ii"' rit v chandra Shekar Slrctll' "^ u vears' Occ: Plt E'rnPloS'ee' A/"";N; 8-l-lol/e6' flat No'e6' Laxmi Nagar Ctfi;' ii'"tkpct' Iliderabad - 500008; Defa ci o-co nr p I a i n a nt ) i*t,^til" "0";t

3. Mrs' RajYa Laxmi Mitta' ' w7;' o''"t'l' ctlunata Shekar Shetti" ;g;; st Years' occ: Homcmaker' ni. rrut r'ro's6' Laxmi Nagar Colony' l;;ikP;t Nala' HYdcrahad 5oooo8r' (Mother-in-law of D*facto-cornplainant) pondent Nos.2.& ilPetitiohers JOIN MEMO T

1. It is subnlitted that the Petitioner ,urr" *u, registered as FIR No 95tZ024' and the Police filed 7".", ;;.; ;, herein/ Petitioners/ Accused pi. a.""o.aingly, the learned Magistra 2025. "r,";*ad hcrein had filed a comptaint and the JirJ ,o-or.ro24, of women P'S' west Sheet against the Respondent ;; ,.';;7;; und'-' s"'' 4e8A & 506 of ,""O"*^"ance vide C'C' 8297 of " V]-v ) i w \ \\,hire so, the peririoner herein and rhe Respondenr i" , ,tl"::.:r1."]l':1 -11., r\u._ lcrenl. al Ihe tnlcrvcntion of lhc elders arrd uell_i.r,ishers, scflled their dispute arnicabry and obtainecJ di'orce by ,utuar consert and rufllier it was aqrced that the petitio,cr herein sha, be rvithdra,"vr conrprourise the proceedings in C.t . No. X2o? of l0l5 -l' It is submilted that as the r,atter is settred a,ricabry out of the courl, no purpose rvotrld be served if the ,ratter is kept penrling, more so when the Petitioner lierein / Deracto-cornprainant is not interesteci to pursue the case. In vie*' of the above facts and circumsta,ces, the continuation of proceedings against the I{espondent Nos.2 & 3 herein/ petitioners/ Accused in C.C. No. 8297 of 2025 rvill not s erve alty purpose and hencc desirablc to be closed. Hence, this Joint Me,o. lt is therelbre prayed that this Hon'bre oou. rnay bc pleased to pe.nit the I)etitioner herei^/ Respond:1t No,2i Defacro_Cor;;lainant ro compound the offe,ces and conrp.onrise u'ith the Respordent Nos.2 & 3/ petitioners / Accused Nos l & 2 a'd quash trre proceedings i, c.('. g297 o1'2025 o,the file of trre *III Addr' (rhief Metroporitan Magistrate, at Naurpa,y and pass such other order or orders dcemed fit and proper in the facts un,l "i..u,rrt*rces ofthe case. Placc: I llderabacl Date:26_09.2025 Counscl for pctitioner. Rcspondenl No.2 Dclacto-cornplai nant Petitioner./Respondent No.2/ Dc lacl o_corn plainant t4 Rf t6^t" r" Respondent No.3/petitioner No.2/ Accused No.2 ^ l{espondenr No.2ipetirioner No. l/ Accused No. I Counsel for Resporl ent Nos.2 & 3/ Pctilioncrs/Accuscd Nos. i & ?