✦ High Court of India · 10 Oct 2025

1. tvliduturi Eishaswini v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,253 words

6. Sri Radha Lodge [Vlanagement, 9-4-8 St Mary's road, Regimental Road, Secunderabad, Telangana -500003

7. Kommerishetty Sridhar, S/o K.Kanakaiah, H.No 10-1-790/3, West lvlarredpally, Secunderabad, Telangana B. Kommerishetty Priya, Wo K.Sridhar, H.No 10-1-790/3, West Marredpally, Secunderabad, Telangana

9. Miduturi Sunder, S/o M. Prabhakar, H.No 2-2g4tA, Koya nagar, Alur Village, Kurnool (Dist), AP- 518395.

10. G.Latha, Wio G.Naganna, H.No 2-616, Koya Nagar, Alur Village, Kurnool (Dist), AP - 518395. ll.Nagadevi Kavali, W/o Rama Krishna Kavali H.No 2-616, Koya Nagar, Alur Village, Kurnool (Dist), AP -518395. 1 2. Ramakrishna Kavali, H.No 2-616, Koya Nagar, Alur Vil i 3e, Kurnool (Dist), AP - 518395. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Inrl r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction rr rre of MANDAMUS, directing the Respondents to: (a) Register a fresh First lnformation Report (FlR) imn r liately, incorporating all relevant provisions of the Protection of Children from { exual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and the Saris Act, 1867, against Respc rdents No. 5 through 12, ensuring a proper and thorough investigation is carried r lt; and (b) Award compensation to the Petitioners to cover (i) H: medical expenses (including Psychiatry treatment) (ii) including standing debts (Credit card bills, Gold loan, fir rlth deterioration and :inancial hardships, :s), related to travel expenses, accommodation, food, health bills, flat rent, and 1 roceries wastage ( iii) Loss of education suffered by Petitioner No. 1 and (iv) Legz I services costs. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Corrr Direct the Respondent Police to immediately, add appr POSCO Act, in FIR No. 365/2024, (Gopalapuram P.S.) zr (Gandhinagar P.S.), and taken further steps strictly in i pending disposal of the writ petition. lumstances stated in may be pleased to rpriate provision of d FIR No. 25112024 ocordance with law, Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI MOHAMMED SOHAIB Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1.,3 & 4: AGP FOR HOM E Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 5to12: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.30844 of 2025 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the pctitioners and learnecl Assistant Govenrment Pleadcr for Home appcaring for responclent Nos-1,3 ancl 4. With their consent, this writ petition is bcing takcn up for clisposal at thc admission stage itself

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- " to direct tlr Respondents to n) Register n fresh First htjbrnmtiort Raport (FlR) innedintely, incttrpontirtg all rekt,ntt proristotts oJ tlu' Protectiott of Clrildren front SaxrLnL Ollbnces Act, 20-12 (POCSO Act), and the Slris Act 7867, agninst Resltondents No.5 tltrotrgh 12, enxLring n proper nnd tlnrutglt irntestigntiott is cnrrtctl otLt nul fi) Atutrd cortpensntiott to tlrc Petitioners [o cotvr (L) HctLtlr deteriorntion nnd nrcdicnl expenscs includittg Pstlcltintry trettnrcnt (ii) Fimncinl lnrdsltips inclutlitrg studing debts Crcdit crtrd bills Cold lonn fmes relnted to trnoel e:tpenses rcconntodttion fttotl lrctltlt bills JlnL rent nrl groceries ?oastnge (iii) Loss of educntion sufiired hy Pctitiotter No.-l nnd Qo) Legnl sentices costs."

3. Brief facts stated in this writ petition are Lhat petitioner No.1 and 2 are r.nothcr and daughter and both the petitioners were mcntallv and physically harassed by the.unofficial rcsporrdcnts, hencc, Petitioncrs on 08.11.2024, lotlgecl a complaint before respondent authorities, however, onlv onc FIR was registcrcd i.e., FIR No.365 of 2024. Thc case of the petitiorrc'rs is that the respondent au thorities in FIR No.365 of 2024, failecl to add Sectior-rs under POCSO Act, hence, petitioners on 08.07.2025, loclged another complaint zridc lD HYD/GP HyD/080725/00226. Further case of petitioners is that though tire said cornplaint is rcgistered on 08.07.2025, till datc the rcspondent 2 authoiities faileci to rcgistcr FIR. Aggrievcd by the same', t ris writ petition is filed. 4 Learr-red Assistant Government Pleader for Hc r - Le appearing for respondentNos. l, 3 uncl 4 pJaced on record instructioll) i succl by thc Sub- lnspcctor of Policc, (iopalapuram Police Station, Hyclerr ,acl, r,r.herein it is submitted that on petitioncrs complaint, FIR No.365 of 20.1 datecl 08.11.2024, was registcrccl for thc lrffences under Sections 308(3), 305( ), 75,'127 (4) BNS against 41-Sric1lrar Rao ancl A2-Smt.Kommerishetty (Ncll: , Sri Laxn'ri Priya Thcrc;rftcr, rrotices uncle r Sectiou 35(3) BNSS was issuecl ;r r I after completion of invcstigation, chargc shcet i,r.as field before the lean.rcr{ I Aclclitional Chief Juclicial Magistratc, Sccunrlcrabacl (hereinafter refcrred as' -ria[ Court')- It is furthcr submittt,t{ t[-rat the petitioner had lodged anoth r courplaint datecl

08.07.2025 with improvcd version. On such complaint, rer,1 ondent No.4 filccl a pctition beforo the frial Court seeking permissiou to rc-i r.estigate the case anrl tcr filc additional ch;rrgc sheet in FIR No.365 of 2025 'i crcaftcr, ttre Trial Cirurt z,irlr, ordcr c{.rtct1 26-09.2025 accorclcd permission t ) re-irlvestigatc thc case antl file aclclitional charge sheet.

5. Learned Assistant Govenrmeut Pleader for Llomc. ubmits tlrat since tl're rc-invcstiga tiou is taken up in FIR No.365 of 2024, thc 1 :titioner's request for registering flcsh FlR is untenable and furtl-rer submi r that once the rc- invcstigation is completcd, ac{clitional charge sheet wou]cl ,e frlecl before thc frial Court

6. Recordinr; the above submissiorrs, without express r q.rny opinion on tlre rncrits of thc case ancl since rc-investigation ir-r FIR No.l '5 <tf 2024 rs taken l up, this Court deems it appropriatc to clisposc of the writ petition directing the respondent autllorities to complete the re-invcstigation and file additional charge sl-reet in FIR No.365 of 2024, as expeditiously as possiblc.

7. With thc above directions, this r,vrit petition IS disposcd of Misccllancous applications, if any pending, shall stancl closcd. No order as to To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- U. SUD SISTANT REG SECTION OFFICER

1. The Secretary, Department of Home, near Govt Hyderabad, The State ofTelangana, Telangana -5 0 Ilege, charminar, 6. 2- The Collector and fVlagistrate, of Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad 4. The Station House Officer, Gopalapuram Police Station, Secunderabad 5. One CC to SRI. MOHAMMED SOHAIB, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOTME ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana. . louTl Two CD Copies B PVL GJP Nrr HIGH COURT DATED:1011012025 ORDER WP.No.30844 of 2025 ':( HE S TA cR c)() t3 t 0 B 202[ c)I * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .':.i l-r 'rl,l,o ^

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments