✦ High Court of India · 15 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Jul 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,476 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI JI,JSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 90860F 2008 "' Between: + Curlisatt\ l{airtsekalt rartt - S/o (runiscttr t)ur ca iah ' ,\op 7{) \.uI.. ( )ee llrtsitrcss, ni. : l-,,1. \ e ll.rttt llrtzar' Warangal Disrict' Thota Virnalrr l)cr' i.\\ir'o Narasaiah Lingam' O," i,i,l,t",,,rr \'ecdhi. Agc: 50 years' Occ: Housewift' Waranqitl Notrrrtlrt \ ct tkltt'.''lrrr ltt ltt' Sio' Ranganayakulu' Ri,, S t t'(,1). \!e: i I \rals' C)cc: Business' J)i!tnit\ tltl \ttect. \\.rr lrrltlal 4 ) 6 7 I I Ilcnugrtirll'-t l'Ltslrpar alltt' W/o l-ate Flarinath' -a,, r..,r.. ()te llt'usclvilc, ( ( iirrt rali1,tr. \\.ttltttcltl' l{cnrLrrttttl.t \ rrt rprrl"ll 'rlittgani' S/o Badraiah' t..,, ' r le e llusincss, R-/o Bank Colony' ^-*...1, \ trrLtL.rttlt |'.ttIttIII ' 'ttIIt \\'/o srinivasaa Rao' il:.',-.1 ]..,,' ()rt ll.ttscrvtl'e' No ll-21-12' [].rrtk L t'1..'rr". \\ 'tr 'rtt'-"tl Krnrrrcllt \ r1.rr.r \\ t' I(niagoapal Rao' 1o., il rr'tir'. ( )1,- | lottscu'tlc' ff ,, f f :'(ll. ll.rrrk t olottv Warangal (iolLuttl-r \ t1.tr.r I .t'rtti \\iitl' Yadagiri' .\qc i() \J.rr. ()rr llottservil'c' t ll-rriL t ,rlottr. \\:tt.tttqal I \trrtidt \ltrrr.r,.l.r. \\ t' \atlllshi"udu' \ '. .l \r'.rr-.(t.( ll'rll:(\\ili- Rfo Rt r &J, r,r--"{J' I I t l0 2 + Koruvelli Shar-adha, W/o. Shankaraiah, Age: 5l years, Occ: Ilouservif-e, R/o. Garimellavari Veedhi, Warangal. Aitha Ram Sateesh, S/o. A.Chandramouli, Age: 33 years, Occ: Ilrrsiness, fuo. Challagarige, chityala Mandal, Warangal

12. Padithala Sunitha, W/o. Venkat Rao. Age: 28 years, Occ: Houservile, R/o. Ookal, Geesugondal. Walangal- l3 l4 I5 r6 t7 l8 l9 20 Alladi Srinivasulu, S/o. Ve nkateshu'antltt. Age: 52 years, Occ: Busittess, R/o. Ganesh ColonY, Warnagal Bollam Jyothsna, W./o. Srinivasulu, Age: 29 years, Occ: Ilouseu ile- R/o. Ramannapet. \\iarangal MAduri Rajeshwari , W /o-Basavalingatl. Age: 70 years, Occ: Ilouservil'e, PJo. Old Beet Bazar . Warangal. Konduri Raj Kunrar, S/o. Mankaiahlin-lr.rnr. Age: 58 years, Occ: []usincss. R/o. JPN Road, Warangal Bandaru Bapu Rao, S/o Kotaiah. Age: 67 years. Occ: lltrsincss. fuo. Srinivas Colony. Warangal. Vangeti Niraja, W/tr Nlrrasirnha Ratr Age: 55 years, Occ: I lrltrserr i li R-/o. Govindaraopet. \\';trattval. Domakuntla Krishna KLrrlrar. S;o Kan.rkrrialr Age: 50 years, Occ llusiness. R/o. D.S.Templc S t rect. Warattqrtl. Lenkalapally Jagan Nlt,ltlrr CLrpt:t. S/o. Narsaiah- Auc-. 5 j R/o. Lakshmi Bazartt. I lrtrrtttakotrcla -rcals- ()cc: I'rt I ttrP]t'ree

21. Kalva Swarajyanr. \\,t,. Ilhrskar llat'- - ll - ? Cunisetty Soundarrverrn. \\/,ir. 11r,r1a",,, Rajasckharam, Age: 63 years, Occ: llouscrviti- R/o. l2-3{8, Ycllrrn Bazaar- Walangal.

23. Deva Jagadeeshrvar. Slo. Late Chakrapani, Age: 50 years, C)cc: Lmployee. R/o. Warangal- 74 25 Gunda Vishrveshu,ara Rao- S,/cr Veerabadraiah, Age: 57 years, Occ: Enrplo_r,ce, R-/o. Vasavi Colonl - Waranual Kukkadapu Shakr.ntla- \\ ro. Gnanendhar [lao, Age: 40 years, Oce: Houscrr ifl. R./o. JPN Road. \\;lranua l. 26*r Soma Rarnaiah. S,'o. Sonra Nar rvana, Age: 60 years. C)cc: []Lrsinr'ss- R/o. 8-3- I38. Konduli \jrri Str.'.-t. Warangal. 27 Addagudi Samba \lrrrrlrr. S'o. [.axrraiah, Age: 65 years, Oec: llLrsincss. R-/o. Papaiah Strcct. \\ ur:rrrqal. 2V Soma Sarnbaiah. S o Sorrur \lua\ana. Age: 65 years. Occ Brrslress. R/o. ll/B. S.[(.Nular. \\ ar:utqul. 29 Pabathi Krishna j\ltrrrlrr. S rr Slrckaraiiih. Age: 55 years. Oce llrr'rrrc... R/o. Galimellar ru i Str cet. \\arrrru;rl.

30. Mahankali Dhrnl I Age: 50 vcars. f{ r, lrkrlrurr \\ o Nlgeshrvara Rao, l{.rrrlrrn.rprt. \\'lranqal.

31. Thota Sonra I-iruirnr. \ tr \.tr.r.uillt- Age: 70 r,ears- I r . I i I 1 | 1 , . . 1 ( !r.r nltr t . \\'arangal : t ) 1

32. Venrula LarntitI.tt.t,r.rtlr. 5 rr \ _i Luttllttn. Agc:55 ycars. Ocl llr'irie '. Cho*rasra- \i axrrr,,,r I ' 3r. Vemula Narasirrlt.r li.rt,. \ Lr \,r krrntattr. .\le : 50 year-s, Occ: Busine s- I( r,. ( lr,,rr t.t.t.t. \\ rtnngal

34. Yada Vl,kunrlrtt. \ !r \iu.r\.rnr. .\se 6l \ etrs, t I F I I I I I I t i i : i 1

36. Akinepalli Jamuna, W/o. Sudhakar, Age: 50 years, Shi ranagar, Warangal. AND ...PETITIONERS

1. The Govemment of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its, Princ rzrl Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Warangal. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal. 4. The Tahsildar, Hanmakonda. 5. The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban [.,rr d Ceiling, Warangal. ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ln,; i I praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th: High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particula"r one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned action of the '3spondents seeking to interfere with our peaceful possession and enjoyment of th: small extents of plots varying from 300 to 360 Sq.yards belongs to the petitir'n :rs in Sy.No. 159/A, 159/8, 159/C, 159/D and 161/B, 158/A situated at Shi'yirmpet jagir (Village), Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District in order to allot :'re lands to 3rd parties without following due process of law and pending our rer iriarization applications before the respondents as illegal, void abinitio and violativr of articles, 14,21 and 300-4 and consequently direct the respondents not ( interfere with our possession of plots in the interest of justice and equity. l.A. No: 2 OF 2008(WP MP. NO: 12031 OF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ; r'lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court l a'7 be pleased to direct the respondents not to disturb the peaceful possessior and enJoyment of the petitioners in respect of land situated in Sy.No. .159/A, 59/B 159/C, 159/D & 161/8, 158/A situated at Shayampet jagir (Villagel, l-lanmakonda Mandal, Warangal District pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: M/s. PARICHAYA REDDY F(.rR SRI ALLADI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT RAVINDER The Court made the following: ORDER i I ; THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAI(SHUAN WRIT PETITION t{o.9o86 of 2(X)8 ORDER: Heard Ms. Parichaya Reddy, learned counsel appearing for Sri Alladi Ravinder, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri D.V. Chalapathi Rao, learned Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for respondents.

2. It is the specilic contention of the petitioners that they are the owners of small extent of plots varying from 3OO to 36O Sq. yards in Surrrey Nos. 159/A, 159/8, IsglC, 159/D and l6tlB, lS/A, situated at Shayampet Jagir (Village), Hanamkonda Mandal, Wararga1 District. They have submitted applications seeking regularization of the said properties in terms of G.O.Ms.No.455 dated 29.O2.2fl02. During pendency of ttre said applications, respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property.

3. Respondents hled a counter affidavit contending trhat the sut$ect properties are excess vacant lands. They have also referred to various Writ Petitions. According to them, one Sri S. Gopinath fited application uide No.B2/1062/06 for regularization of his possession over tlrc land to an extent of 267.67 Sq. yards in Survey No. 155/8, cov€red by declaration urde proceedings No,B214693/06, and the other petiti.,orrers did not file any application for regularization of their possession over tlre excess vacant lands in terms of G.O.Ms.No.45S dated 29.OZ.2AO2. Tfrerefore, they are not entitled for any relief, much less, ttre relief sought in the present Writ Petition- I 2 KI,. J wP 9086_2008

4. lrarned counsel for the petitioners, on j rs tructions, would submit that the petitioners are not in touch with t re m. Despite their best efforts, they could not contact the petitioners. -l- terefore, they are not in a position to inform this Court about the pr.,rsent status of the

5. In the light of the above said submission, as ri llrtly contended by the respondents, though ttre petitioners are claimi rlt that they have submitted applications for regularization under G.0. M".pyo.Oa5 dated

29.07.2OO2, they have not filed any proof of the san: :. Vrde order dated

24.04.2OO8 in W.P.M.P.No.l2O3t of 2OO8 in W.p.Nc, (t )86 of 20O8, the erstwhile High Court of Andhra pradesh direct. rl Lhe pa_rties to maintain status quo existing as on that date. Thus, h:v have obtained the said order by way of misrepresentation.

6. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, th; Writ petirion is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petiti. ( rs lo t:rke sreps in accordance with law, if cause survives. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, rnv. shall stand closed To //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.H, J. GOWRI SHANKAR IANT REGISTRAR Ass l 1!. SECTION OFFICER 1 2 -3 One CC to SRI ALLADI RAVINDER, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNMENT, High Court for thi Slate of Tetangana at Hyderabad. [OUTJ Two CD Copies PSK. GJP , HIGH COURT DATED:1510712025 I l1 ORDER \ -\ ,-,.i\ WP.No.9086 of 2008 l I 't I fltl 1025 \.,','..,,, 'i: DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 2 / r'5 /, 4/,( ,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments