Chapalamadugu Vikram Simha v. The Tahasildar, Tahasil Office, Challapalli, Challapalli
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am also of the opinion that without following due process of law even an encroacher cannot be dispossessed. Thus, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in question…
Judgment
…PETITIONER …PETITIONER Petitioner submits that he is the absolute owner of the land admeasuring Ac.2.06 cents in R.S.No.15/2 of Nimmagadda Village,
Chellapalli Mandal, Krishna District. While so, the first respondent issued a notice stating that the Nimmagadda village is declared as Indiramma Village to distribute house site pattas to the beneficiaries and as per the instructions of the District Collector, on inspection it is revealed that an extent of Ac.17.17 cents of land in R.S.No.15/2 is recorded as Government poramboke land and that the petitioner encroached an extent of Ac.1.50 cents and cultivating the same. Accordingly, the petitioner was informed to vacate the said land immediately otherwise action would be taken as per law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even assuming that the said land is a Government land, the respondents have to take action in accordance with law under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905; but without following due process prescribed in law, the respondents cannot dispossess the petitioner from the land in question.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am also of the opinion that without following due process of law even an encroacher cannot be dispossessed. Thus, the respondents are directed not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in question without following due process of law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ V. ESWARAIAH, J September 17, 2007 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order by 18.09.2007 (B/o) DSK
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 17 Sep 2007. The bench was V ESWARAIAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.