✦ High Court of India · 07 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Mar 2025
Length
1,017 words

years, occ Ananthaqiri Ananthachary, S/o. Late Madhava Chary, Aged 6ijj:ii ;Yffi;ii.'"'i"o}r"ior,a swamy rempte, Artapur, Rajendernagar' R.R.District. Ananthaqiri Seshachary, S/o. Late tVladhava Chary' Aged 54 years' Occ FliiJ;i ;i'ir;;inr'-prirr"rohi swamv remple' Attapur' Raiendernagar' R.R.District. years' Oc-c Ananthaqiri Srinivaschary, S/o Late lVladhava Chary' Aged Fijj:;i ff ffi;,h; FlJ.ii*onJ s*r.y rempte, Atrapur, Raiendernasar' R. R. District. Ananthaqiri Raghavendrachary, S/o Late lVladhava Chary' Aged 45 years' 6"8', i;rliii'r,i xiuntni pro ri,iibh, s*arny rem pre, Auapur, Raiendernasar' R.R.District. All the petitioners are pujaries and founder trustees of Anantha Padmanabha Swamv Temple, Attapur ,,riJd", a'i"noi'nagar. mandal' Rangareddy District' il; Fi 'il;-i2d, "Ananthi"-piJinanaoni Swamv remple' Attapur' -49 Ra.jendernagar, R. R.District' .....PETITIONERS 1 2 3 4 AND

1. The State of Telangana, rep'by its Principal Secretary to Endowments Department. Secretariat Buildings' HyderaDao' Boggulakunta, Abids, HYderabad' Boggulakunata, Abids, HYderabad' 2TheCommissionerofEndowmentsDepartment'TelanganaState, - 3. The Asst.Commissioner of Endowments Department' Telanga State' - 4. The District collector, Rangareddy District at Lakadikapool, Hyderabad' 5. The Revenue Divisional officer, Hyderabad west at Attapur' Rajendranagar' 6. The Tahsildar, Rajendrangar mandal' Rajendranagar' Rangareddy District' RangareddY District.

7. The Commissioner GHlr,ilC Tankbund, Hyderabad. 8. The Deputy C_ommissioner, GHtvlC Rajendranagar Circle:-Vl, Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District. 9 Baddam Enclave,.lgp:by ils Managing Directors Baddam prabhakar Reddy and Baddam Jeevith Reddy Having its office at Attapur village, Rajendranjgar mandal, Rangareddy District.

10. The Slation House Officer, Rajendranagar police Statior, Cyberabad, Rangareddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to g in not protecting the Anantha Padmanabha Swamy Tempre lands admeasuring Ac.12 02 guntas i.e., rn Survey No.'10 admeasuring Ac.2.1B guntas, Survey No.11 i:dmeasuring Ac.1.34 guntas, Survey No.12 admeasuring Ac.O.27 guntas, Survey. No.15 admeasuring 4c.2.01 gunta, Survey No.16 admeasuring Ac.2.1g guntas and Survey No.20 admeasuring Ac.2.24 guntas thus totally admeas uring Ac.12.02 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District insprte of the petitioners application dated 26-11-2013 from the encroachment of gth respondent including constructional activity and similarly situated land grabbers in the Attapur village, Rajendranagar manda[, Rangareddy Disrrict vicinity as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also against the provisions of A.p.charitable lnstitutions and Hindu Religious Act '1987 and consequential directions to the: respondents to stop the illegal encroachments and constructions carrying by the 9th respondent in collusion with land grabbers in the vicinity of Attapur village, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District over the Anantha padmanabha Swamy Tempre lands i.e., in survery Nos.10, 11, 12, 15, 16 and 20 admeasr-rring Ac.12.02 guntas i.e ' in Survey No.10 admeasuring Ac.2.1g guntas, survey No.11 admeasuring Ac.1 .34 guntas, Survey No.'12 admeasuring Ac.O.27 guntas, Survey No.15 admeasuring Ac.2.O1 gunta, Survey No..16 admeasuring Ac_2.1g. guntas and Survey No 20 admeasuring Ac.2.24 guntas thus totafly a(imeas uring Ac.12.o2 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District. l.A.NO:1 OF 2014 (WPMP.NO:2 3858 0F 2014) Petition Under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to stop the illegal encroachments and constructions carrying by the 9th respondent in collusion with land grabbers in the vicinity of Attapur village, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District over the Anantha Padmanabha Swamy Temple lands i.e., in survery Nos.10, 11, 12, 15,.,l6 and 20 admeasuring 4c.12.O2 guntas i.e., in Survey No.10 admeasuring Ac.2.1g guntas, Survey No.11 admeasuring Ac.'l .34 guntas, Survey No.12 admeasuring Ac.O.27 guntas, Survey No.15 admeasuring Ac.2.01 gunta, Survey No.16 admeasuring Ac.2.18 guntas and Survey No.20 admeasuring Ac.2.24 guntas thus totally admeasuring 4c.12.02 guntas situated at Attapur village, Rajendranagar mandal, Rangareddy District pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V.BRAHMATAH CHOWDARY (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3 : Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 & 8 : SRI PASHAM KRISHNA REDDy Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : - Counsel for the Respondent No.10 : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEIVIAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.19O36 of 2Ol4 ORDER: When the writ petition was ca-lled on 25.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, hence, it was directed to be listed on 2B.O2.2Otl5 under the caption 'for dismissal'. On the said date, at the request of learned counsel for petitioners, it u,as directed to be listed on 07.O3.2025. Today, there is no representatirtn on behalf of the petitioners

2. The matter pertains to alleged attemptsi to alienate the Anantha Padmanabha Swamy Temple lanr1s in favour of the 9th respondent-Baddam Enclave. This writ petition is of 2014, and was last listed on 18.12.2014 be fore coming up on 02.08.2024 i.e., almost after a decade. Apparently the petitioners have not taken steps for mentioning/listing of the matter; it appears that the petitionr:rs are not interested in pursuing this writ petition. a The Writ Petition is therefore dismissr:d lor non- prosecution. No costs. Pending miscellaneous a.pplications, il an5. shall stand closed. I ,t //TRUE COPY// SD/. A. SRTNIVASA REDDY A9STSTANT REGISTRAR ir '. 1 l\,\ \ i sEcnoN oFFtcER To 1 Two CC to cp FOR HOIVE, High Court for tfre Statel{ Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. fwo CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMIENTS, Hi at Hyderabad. [OUT] gh Court for the Sitate of Telangana 3 Two CCs to Gp FOR REVLI\UE, High Court tor tne Stare or tetangana ar 4 5 6 Hyderabad. [OUT.i One CC to SRt V.BRAHfUAIAH CHOWDARy, Advocate [OpUC] One CC to SRt pASHAM KRTSHNA neOOV, [jr""ri" fopUCl Two CD Copies SA CJP clt(l- .. I ( G ,",r('=..;ffi") /. :) c )0 IiIAY I 2825 t r_O HIGH COURT DATED:07 t03tZO2S ORDER WP.No.19036 of 2014 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON _ PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. CHL -'kslz(

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments