The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,.the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus. declaring the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering into the Civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.6 during the pendency of Civil Suit vide O.S. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Addl. Junior Civil Judge Court at uajwal and trying to dispossess the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.3-181/2Gts in SY. No. 99 A/1 . which is situated at ltikyala village Jagdevpur Mandal. Siddipet District by colluding with habitual land grabber i.e respondent No.6 and without having any jurisdiction is highly illegal. arbitrary. unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and also violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 5 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful possession and not to dispossess the Petitioner from his cultivating land during the pendency. of civil suit and not evict and dispossess the Petitioner from his land taking the advantage of Police protection order in l.A. No. 747 a 2019 OS 88 of 2018 on the file of Junior Civil Judge court at gajwel that to by colluding with habitual land grabber i.e respondent No.6. lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 5 not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful possession and not to dispossess the Petitioner from his cultivating land during the pendency of r;ivil suit and not evict and dispossess the Petitioner from his land bv taking the advantage of Police protection Order in l.A. No. 747 of 2019 os 88 of 2018 on the file of Junior Civil Judge Court at Gajwel that to by coltuding with habitual land grabber i.e. Respondent No. 6 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the R.espondent Nos. 1 to 5 : AGP FOR HOME ,t Counsel for the Respondent No. 6 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER -t HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.30038 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for HgnG appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. *rr

2. This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the Respondent No.5 in interfering into the Civil disputes between the Petitioner anc{ Respondent No.6 during the pendency of Civil Suit ttide O.S No.88 of 2018 on the file of Additional Junior Civil Judge Court at Gajwal and trying to disposscss the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.3-18 % Gts in Sy.No.99A/1, which is situated at Itikyala village, Jagdevpur Mandal, Sidc{ipet District, by colluding with habitual land grabber i.e respondent No.6 and without having any jurisdictior-r is highly illegal, arbitrary, unccrnstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21. and 300-4 of the Cons titution of India and also violation of the Principlgl of Natural Justice #,^, consequently 4iru., the Respondent'No.S not to interfere into the Petitioner's peaceful possession and not to dispossess the Petitioner from his cultivating land during the pendency of civil suit and not evict' and disp'rossess the petitioner frorn his land taking the advantage of Police { protection order in I.A No.747 of 2019 in OS No.88 of 2018 on the file of Junior Civil Juclge court at Gajwel

3. Toc{ay when the matter has bcen tal<en up lor hearing, lea:'ned I I Assistant Governrnent Pleacler for I-Iome appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 placed a copy of order dated 1.6.04.2025 passecl by the Additional Junior Civil l"',. / ! \ .izzi Juclge-Cum-r\dclitional Judicial Magistrate of }rirst (llass at Gajwel in I.A.No.747 of 20'19 in IA.No.229 of 20-18 in O.S.No.B8 of 2018, relevant portion is exh'acted hcreu nder:- "Ln tlrc result, petition is nllouted ruitltout costs, grnnting police protectiort. Tlu sllo, lagndeuput" is directed to gittc policc protection wheneucr required to tlrc ptttitioner to get the c'rcler intplenrcnted in IA No.229 of 2018 dated 10.09.2018."

4. Learned Assistant Governn'rent Pleader for Horne further submits that subsequent to tht: ordcr datecl 1,6.04.2025 in I.A.No.747 of 2019 in IA.No.229 of 2018 in O.S.No.BS of 2018, thc respondent authorities have provided police protection to l.he responclcnt No.(i to gct the order implemcnted in IA.No-229 of 2018 in O.S.No.88 oi 2-018, dated 10.09.2018.

5. At tlris stage, learnecl counsel l'or the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to witl'rdrav'r the writ petition with a iibertlr to avail appropriate rcmedy as available uuder law.

6. [n vier,v of thc above, permission is accorded to r&ithdraw the writ \etition with a tibert'y to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.

7. Accordingll', ttrc vt'rit petition is c{ismissed as withdrawn' Miscellaneous petiti6111r, if anv, pencling in this rvrit petition shall stand closed. No costs. //TRUE COPY// BHAVANI SWAMY STANT REGIS SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Adv-ocate tg.Pyc]. 2.TwoCCstoGPFORHOME,HighCourtforthestateoI 3. Two CD CoPies \, Telangana. [OUT] PVL GJP Rnq. I I HIGH COURT DATED:06/1 012025 ORDER WP.No.30038 of 2025 '-' - *+5q-+--. ..- IHE SI4 o 2 E t{0ll il6 c *- * (i. ry'* DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS .- i.. i *-.trl;i*.-. :.'::..-i.:. :: i . ., .i; .::. _q_r1" +.la- r @a^., >z-\nl>-{