✦ High Court of India · 13 Feb 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,015 words

Acts & Sections

The Tahsildar, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy, Kamareddy District. Smt. Janabai, Wo Gaini Ralingam, aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No.2-4, Sangojiwadi Village, Tadwai Mandal, Kdmareddy Diskict J 4 E 6 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in tho circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lr'landamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in issuing the lmpugned Notice No.8/7912021, daled 28.10.2023 and trying to cancel the pattadar passbook of the petitioner on his cultivating land in Sy.No.70 to an extent of Ac.6.36 gts situated at Kalojiwadi Revenue Village, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District, without considering the explanation dated 01 11.2023 made by the petitioner and without having any jurisdiction as per the provisions of the ROR Act and trying to dispossess the petitioner from his land during the pendency of S.A No.416 of 2023 before this Hon'ble Court is highly Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR counsel for the Respondent No'1 t u' X;rtFsHiffyrirf-^' Counsel for the Respondent No'6: SRI MURALI NANCHARLA The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BIIASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No.32408 of 2o.23 ORDER: This Writ pe tition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the lollowing reliei -thp "...to rssue an appropiate tt,rlt, yrder or_direction more particwlqrlA one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declarinc the oirion of th" gh respondent ,r ,ssurno tmpllgr.d---i;;;: i;.b;;;;2o2r, dated 28.,10.202J and tryin{ to can.cel the pattadar passbioi iJ tne petftione, on his cuhiuatrnq land irt Su. No.70 to an ..t"ri;ii;.;.i6- gts srtuated ot Kalojiwodi Reuenue Vittioe., 7(16 u,o't M;";;,' '-ii,iJrZOOO O,rrnr,, uithout consrdeinq the e"xoLanation a"r"i u-.'l i.'iiiii maae bg the petltioner and Ll)thout trautno ang juisdi:!i?" a, ;;;-;;rotuisions of the ROR,.Acr and^tryutg ro drspo-"ssess rhe petitioner irim ii{iina auAng the pendettcg of s-A.No.416 of 2o23 oeyore tnLis 'u"n:oi.' J".rt is highrg illegal. arbitrory. u nconst it utionat, urototion of'rn"irrj., of Natural Justice and in uiotation oJ vrctatio;i;rtilr"r')')"'i"7 ,oo_A of the ""tso Constttution of Inclia and set asrde tn tipugr,ei Noti"J'ffo.Al ZSt ZOZI, dqted 28. j0.2O23 qnd not to concet tio"p"n"ai-io.JsOook of tne petitioner on his cuttiuattnq Lond in Sa. ur.ldi"iil*{iiil Ac.6.s6 sts sttuated at Katojiwadi Reuenue v1ti"g., roaioi' ilorioii no^rr"aay Distnd, to cottstder the pxplonel isn 2","a t .) i.' iiii maae bg rne p"tttioner ond without hcturno atry juisdiction p;r;;;;-:;*iotrs of the RoR Act ottd not to d,rro".#.r^rih" p.,i,trn"rli_ 'iiiil"r"o duing the perdencs of S.A. No.4 t b of 2023 befie t ni, Uri:ii Coirt.l.'1" "" "o _

2. It is the case of the possessor of agricultural petltioner that he is the owner and lands admeasuring Ac.4.06 gts in Sy.No.70l 1A, Ac.4.O6 gts in Sy.No.70l 1AA, Ac.4.06 gts in Sy.No.70l tE, Ac.4.O5 gts ln Sy.No.70l 1Etr and Ac.4.O5 gts in Sy.No.7O/ lU, total admeasuring Ac.2O.2g gts situated at Kalojiwadi Village, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District. It is stated that the petitioner hled W.p.No.49g6 of 2074 on the file of this Court - challenging thc mutalion procecdings in Case No.l.5/2151/2008 dated 2O.O4.'20 12 issued by thc respondent No.4 in respect of the subject land, nnd this Court granted an interir:t order dated

21.O2.2O14 suspending the said procccdings. It is furlirer stated that during the pendency of W.P.No.4986 of 2Ol4 and S.A. |1o.416 of 2023 on the hle of this Court, respondcnL No.5 issued the irrpugned notice No.B/79 12021 dated 28.10.2023. The grievance of tt.e petitioner is that even though he submittecl detailed expl,nation dated O1.11.2023 to the impugned notice dated 28.1O.2023, the respondent No.5 rn collusion with respondent No.6 is tling to cancel the petilioner's pattadar passbook in rcspect of lanc admeasuring Ac.6.36 gts in Sy.No.7O situated at Kalojiu'adi ReverLrle Village and mutate the namc of the respor-rdcnt No.6 and her son in the revenue records, u.ith a view to dispossess the petitioncr from the subject 1ands.

3. Ms. Tekuru Swetcha, learned Assistant Goverttment Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondcnt Nos.l to 5, submitled that this Court initially granted an interim order on '),1.O2.2O14 irt W.P.No.4985 of 2074. After contest, the said interim order was vacated vide order dated O 1.08-2023. Thereafter, l.he respondent No.6 submitted application seeking mutation of her n.ame in respect of land admeasuring Ac.6.36 gts in Sy.No.7O situate,l ar Kalojiwadi 4 ROR Act, 2O2O. Al dated ol.l r.rora ,,tnough remedy before ,n"' this Cour present writ petition .rt approached the petitioner tn" impugned ,.,.,r"., lo*"ted competent authorifz, b'v filing tnr o."""r-r,'* s mrsconceived an expianadon nstead of Pursuip* 1-'1" n" has prematureiy and not _.1_"': -* ""t matntainabie' Hence, rhe s. According.rr, petitioner has alread_v . the impugned,",,* the uz.;* ^ . . writ Petition is clismiss o" *ool:,:;:;;,;..,.ff I .;r.'T .*,..,.1";;::.*, N. 5 is direc,ed :r aflording au" oppo.tr.i;:.;-,"."."j; ;:. ;.j:j:::;,": parties. As a sequel, the m stand closed. No order r"'::":"::""'petitions pending, if anv, sha, To IITRIJE COPYII SD/. . II4ALLIKA ASSISTANT SECT

1. The Tahsitdar Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy, Kama reddy District One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate loPucJ One CC to SRI MURALI NANCHARLA, Advocate [OpUC] Two CCs toG Hyderaba d[o 5. Two CD Copies P FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetang uI]

4. RJUNA RAO REG ts oFFICER ana at BSR BS HIGH COURT DATED:1 310212025 ORDER WP.No.32408 of 2023 ()l'l1ltE S \ 6 10 lLtL 20[ '\ :',:' ; ,lptii., ) * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS g ,zz 1-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments