Moturi Latha, Wo. Jaya Prakash v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mit be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to consider and dispose of the petiti )ner's representation daled 11-07-2025 in respect of agricultural land in ;y. No. 38Sl2lAAl2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 0-10 gts and Sy. No, 3901 lBl2 admeasuring to an extent of Ac.3-12 gts, total admeasuring to an extent ol \c. 3-22 gts, situated at Nagineniprolu Revenue Village, Burgampahad Mandal, [] radradri-Kothagudem District, in accordance with law, pending disposal of the ma n writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURYA BALU MAHENDRI, Gounsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: SR! L. RAVtNtlEFl, AGP FOR REVENUI: Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 10: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.29952 of 2025 oRAL ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4. 2 According to the petitioner, her patemal grandmother, namely, late Smt.Duppati Bhadramma was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac'0'10 guntas Sy.No.389/2/ AAl2 and Acs.3.12 guntas in Sy'No'390/l/B/2' total land admeasuring Acs-3.22 guntas, situated at Nagineniprolu Revenue Village, Burgampahad Mandal' Blradradri - Kothagudem District. She has filed a suit in O.S.No.369 ol 2025 against respondent Nos'5 to l0 seeking partition and separate possession of the subject property' She has also flled an Interlocutory Application in the said suit seeking to restrain respondent Nos.5 to l0 from alienating the subject property and from changing the physical t-eatures of the subject property and the same is pending' i : I I I 2

3. During the pendency of the said srr r and the said Interlocutory Application, she has submitted I representation dated I 1.01 .2025 to respondent No.4 with i request not to entertain any documents submitted by resporrr ent Nos.5 to 10 in respect o[ the subject property. The same was not considercd. Thereforc, challenging the st id inaction of respondent No.4, petitioner filed the present w it petition.

4. As discussed supra, the suit ar I Interlocutory Application filed by the petitioner for parlit ln and sep:rate possession and not to alienate the subject prol) )rty are pending. During thc pendcncy of thc said suit and tte Interlocutory Application, thc petitioner can't subm ir representation

11.07.2025 to rcspondcnt No.4 with a requej not to entertain any docurncnr subtnitted by respondent Nos.j to l0 in respect of the subjcct prol)elty and also she can't file the present writ petition allcging non-consideration of the se.i I representation. Thereforc. ltctitioncr is not entitled for the rel ef much less the relief sought in thc prescnt writ petition. 3 I

5. tn the light of the same, this Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, dismissed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach respondent No.4 after obtaining orders in the said Interlocutory Application or in the said suit. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO STANT REGISTRA //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI SURYA BALU MAHENDRA, Advo 2. fwo CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at PUCI Hyderabad. [OUTt

3. Two CD Copies MP TJ b. I I I I I I I I I t I I i I t I I I I i I I I i I I I i i : i I i I HIGH COURT DATI iD:2610912025 a i) 2 r fE8 2026 c) 'J -2 ORDER WP.Nc, 29962 ol2O25 DISMISSING THE Vl RIT PETITION WII HOUT COSTS )-b 7,?'