The High Court · 2025

Being Rep. by their c.P.A. Holder Sri ChinthojuRanjith thrry S/o, Chinthoju Sudaishan Chary (Late) Aged about 40 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.1- 136, Pendyal Viliaje, [t/aheswaram fMandal, Ranga Reddy District - 509325. T.S. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, B"_r9!!9_D^epartment, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Khairatabad, Hyderabad T.5-500022. 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Kongara Kalan Village lbrahimpatnam tt/landal Ranga Reddy District-S01 51 0.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Farooqnagar Division, Shadnagar Ranga Reddy District.- 50921 6.

4. The Tahsildar, Farooqnagar Division, Shadnagar Ranga Reddy District.-

5. Pillanagrovila Krishnakanth, S/o P Lakshmaiah {ged about.33.years, Occ. Ag ricul[u re, R/o H. No. 8-70, S i m I anaq:r1 C9 Firooqnagar [/andal, Ranga Reddy District - 509216. ny,^ ^Cfrattan pa I ly Villag e,

6. H. Yagantaiah, S/o Chinna Maddileti {9"d about.38.years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o HlNo.S-16E, Ram Nagar Colony, Chattanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal' Ranga Reddy District - 509216' .....RES'.NDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [/landamus declaring the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not consirlering the Representation of the Petitioners dated 03-09-2025 for illegal interference by unofficial Respondents No.5 and 6 and their henchmen, who are tryirrg to dispossess the Petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective shares of Ac.5-381/2 Guntas each from agricultural lands in Sy.ttlo.686 (New) Sy.No.403(Old), admeasuring to an extent of Ac.11-37 Guntas out of total extent of Ac.13.00 Guntas, situated at Chattanpally Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (Erstwhile [/ahbubnagar District), Telangana State having acquired the same through a Registered Will Deed vide Doc.No.11/Bl(-llll201} dated 29-11-2O1O having registered at Sub Registrar Office at Farooqnagar, [/ahbubnagar District, despite having made Representatirtn dated 03-09-2025 to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioners from their Agriculture lands is illegal and arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 3tl0-A of the Constitution of lndia and also in violation of Principles of Natural Justit;e and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 03-09-2025 to not to interfere, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of Agricuiture lands in respective shares of Ac.5-38112 Guntas each from agricuttural lands in Sy.Nlo.686 (New) Sy.No.403(Old), admeasuring to an extent of Ac.11-37 Guntas out of total extent of Ac.13.00 Guntas, situated at Chattanpally Village of Farooqnagar fi/landal, Ranga Reddy District (Erstwhile [Vlahbubnagar District), Telangana State ov unotriciaf@5 disposing the Representation dated 03-09-2025, in accordance with law 5na 6 and their henchmen, by |.A.NO:1 OF:2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the Representation dated 03-09- 2025 to not to interfere, to not to dispossess or vacate the Petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of Agriculture lands in respective shares of Ac.5- 381t2 Guntas each from agricultural lands in Sy.No.686 (New) Sy.No.403(Old), admeasuring to an extent of Ac.11-37 Guntas out of total extent of Ac.13.00 Guntas, situated at Chattanpally Village of Faroognagar fMandal, Ranga Reddy District (Erstwhile tVahbubnagar District), Telangana State, by unofficial Respondents No.5 and 6 and their henchmen, in accordance to law Pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU Counset for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITTO No.30lll of 2025 ORAL If RDER: Hoard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.l-.Ravinder, leanted Assistant Governtneut Pleader fbr Revettu,l.

2. Aocolding to the petitioners, their grandfatlter, ttantely, late Sri Kurva Bhovaiah (@ Rajula Bhovaiah was the absolute owner ernd possessor of- land admeasuring Acs.l I .37 guntas, out of total extent of Acs.l3.00 guutas, in Sy.68(r (New) (Sy.No.403 (old)), situated at Chattanpally Village, Farooqrragar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District (now Rangare:ddy District). Their grandfather executed a Will Deed

29.11.2(ll0 in I'avour of the petitioner in respect of the subject propert\/. Their grandfatl"rer died on 23.05.201 I . Therealter, petition,:rs have succeeded the subject property. They have submittr:d representations dated 02.06.2025, 21.04.2025 and

30.08.21)24 to respondent Nos.2 to 4 with a request to rnutate 2 their naule and issue pattadar passbook. The same was not considered. Therefore, they ltave filed a Writ Petition No.26505 of 2025. Vidc order dzrtecl 03.09.2025, this Court <lisposed of the said writ petition gratrting libcrty to the ;letitior-rers to subrnit onliue application to the Competent Authority along with all the relevatrt docurtrents, including the albresaid Will Deed, seeking ttrutation proccedings ancl fbr issuance of- e-pattadar passbook. Ort receipt o[' the said application, this Court directed the Cotnpetent Authority to consider and dispose it of in accordatlce with law

3. In the present writ affidavit, petitioner has ttot stated as to submissiou of online application to the Competent Authority in cornpliance with the order dated 03.09.2025 in W.P.No.26505 of 2025. They ltave subrnitted a representation dated 03.09.2025 to respondettt Nos.2 to 4 with a request to take action against respondetlt Nos.5 and 6 stating that they are illegally interfering with the possessiot"t of the petitioners over the subject property. According to thc pctitioner, respotldent 3 Nos.5 and 6 are land grabbers. The said representation was not consirlered. Therefore, challenging the said inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 4, petitioners filed the present writ petttrcrn.

4. As discussed supra, in compliance with the aforesaid I I order dated 03.09.2025 in w.P.No.26505 of 2025, peritioners have to submit online application, along with all the relevant documents and the aforesaid will Deed, to the competent Authority with a request to issue mutation proceedings. But, the pelitioners can't submit a representation dated 03.09.2025 with a request to take action against respondent Nos.5 and 6 stating that they are illegally interfering with the possession of the petitioners over the subject property. petitioners can't file the pre:sent writ petition alleging non-consideration of the said representation dated 03.09.2025. Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief much less the relief sought in the present writ petition. 4 j-r? l:

5. In the light of the same, this writ Petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY/ SD/.T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two ccs to GP FOR REVENUE, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. Oi.r" CC to SRI BOLLU NAGARAJU, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CD CoPies SA BS r{T l HIGH COURT DATED:06/1 012025 I I \ S.""i.- L:. 'f,(J 0 ,t!l?fi * * ORDER WP.No.3l01 11 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. { r\rb 7/'