The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KONDA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, RA"' RURAL DEVELOPMENT SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT 1 W.P. No: 29888 0F 202s Between: Shiva Anil Kumar, S/o Shiwa Somaiah, Aged about 32 r ears, Occ. Business, R/o lvlarikal Village and Mandat, Narayanp6t Districr, Te i "nr"?..B,Efir,O*a* AND 1 . The State of T_elangana, Rel:. byPrl Secretary, panchay lth Raj and Rural Development Department, Dr. B.R. Ambedkaisecretaql Hyderhbad, Telangana State. 2. The Diskict Collector, Narayanpet District, Narayanpet, I :lagana State. 3. The District Panchayath Officer, Narayanpet, Teianlana itaie. 4. Marikal Gram Panchayath, Rep by its Panchayath Secre ary, Marikal Village and Mandal, Naraanpet District, Telangana Stdte. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the lligh Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more pa(icularll, tne in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside the impugn€( common notice No.GP/65/2025. dt. 22l1gl2\25, issued by the 4th respo dent consequenily direct the 4rh respondent not to interfere with petitioner hous( construction work lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the oi cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl may be pleased to pass interim suspension of the impugned common notice ,lo.Gp/6 SI2O2S, dt. 22togl2o25, issued by the 4th respondent duly direct the 4ll respondent not to interfere with petitioner house construction work till disposal c the main case Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KONDA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR PANCHAyTI I Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K. PRADEEP REDD'/ RAJ RURAL DEVELOI MENT SC FOR GRAM PANCI AYAT 3 W.P. No: 298S1 OF 2025 Between: Smt Surati Laxmi, Wo Surati Venkatesh. Aoed about 60 hold, R/o Marikat Village and Mandat, t{arbya-npet Oistiict, years, Occ. House Telangana State AND ...PETITIONER

1. The State of Telangana, rep. by prl. Secretary, panchayath Rai and Rural uevetopment uepartment, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretary, Hyderabad, I elangana State

2. The District Collector, Nalqyanpet District, Narayanpet, Telagana State. 3. The District Panchayath Officei, Narayaniet, Teianlaria Staie. 4. ft/arikal Gram Panchayath, Rep bJ it3 pinchayath-Secretary, Marikar Vi age and Mandal, Narayanpet Distriit, Telangana Stite. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by setting aside the impugned common notice No.GP/65/2025, dt.2210912025, issued by the 4th respondent consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with petitioner's house construction work lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue interim drrection to the 4th respondent and its officials not to interfere with the petitioners house construction work, pending disposal of the writ petition 4 lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ( in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour permit the petitioners to change the material papers No.819iBPl2025, dl.:2817 12025, 2) proceedings No.820/BFl ircumstances stated may be pleased to .e. 1) proceedings 2025, dt.:281712025, 3) proceedings No.82118P12025, dt. :281712O25, 4) proceed r dt. :281712O25, 5) proceedings No.830/BP/2025, dt.:2817|,L No.831/BP/2025, dI. :281712025, 7) proceedings No.832/8 t' 8) proceedings No.833/BP/2025, dt.:2817 /2025, 9) proceedir dl.:281712O25, 10) proceedings No.835/BP/2O25, dt.:2817 gs No.B22lBP/2025, r25, 6) proceedings 2025, dl.:281712O25, ls No.834/8P/2025, '2025 filed in WP No.29886/2025 to file in this case Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KONDA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR PANCHAIi .T RAJ RURAL DEVEL(] 'MENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K. PRADEEP REDtf ', SC FOR GRAM PANI] {AYAT The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER @ . . ...f/ .:4, i. ,.at:ir THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADIIAVI DE\II WRIT PETITION Nos.2988 6 29A8A &29 89 t oF 2o2s COPMMON ORDER: In these writ petitions, petitioners are challenging the notices dated 22.09.2025 issued by the 4th respondent vide proceedings No.GP/65/2025 requiring the petitioners to stop the construction and to submit the documents relating to said construction to the Gram Panchayat within two days, as illegal and arbitrary'

2. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, all are heard together and are disposed of, by way of this common order.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners' learned Government Pleader lor Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri K.Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for respondent No'4' It is submitted that the petitioners have obtained permission 4. for making construction and in the sanctioned plan' it is clearly shown that the width of Gram Panchayat road itself is 50" ft whereas in the impugned notice it is mentioned that the petitioner has to leave 50' ft gap from the middle of the road to NH-167' It is submitted that these notices are therefore illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and the respondents ought to have issued show 2 cause notices to the petitioners and consider th( ir explanations before instructing the petitioners to stop the constrr ction. I-earned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance or. the decision of this Court in W.P.No.21O53 of 2Ol9 dated 24.(tl t.2019 for this proposition.

5. Learned Standing counsel appearing for Grarr Panchayat, on oral instructions, submitted that the petitioners a re encroaching the path beside the National Highway and are maki rg construction and therefore, impugned notices have been given He submitted that notices dated 22.09.2025 are show caur; : notices and explanations of the petitioners dated 24.O9 .2( 25 would be considered.

6. Having regard to the rival submissions ar C material on record, this Court obsenres that on receipt of a corr rlaint from the local residents, respondent No.4 has issued notices dated

22.09.2025 to the petitioners. This Court hnds th rt they are not notices for demolition but are issued only requirinl; the petitioners to submit the documents relating to their constr rctions to the Gram Panchayat. Therefore, the notices dated 22.Ct<. .2025 shall be considered as shou, cause notices ald the petitione,r s have already submitted their explanations thereto. The res p rndents shall consider the same and also the docurnents submitte 1 by them and E ..., !!,!!qr : nl .'! 3 thereafter, proceed in accordance with law. Since the petitioners have permission to make construction, they may proc;ed with the construction tili the respondents veriff their sites and if the authorities find that the petitioners are making constructions in violation of permission Branted to them, they are at liberty to take action in accordance with law.

7. WitJ' the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending, shall stand closed. SD/. AH ED ABDULLAH KHAN ISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To, Dr. B.R. RhOeOfar Sei;retary, Hyderabad, Telangana State' 1 . The Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj ald Rural Development Department' z. itre--Oistriit Collector, Naraybnp6t District, Narayanpet, Telagana State' 5. f ne Oiiirict Panchayath Officei, Narayanpet, Telangana State' +. One CC to SRl. KONDA SRINIVAS' Advocate tOPqCL s. i*o CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT,High - 6. o;;Ca t; sRt K PRADEEP REDDY, STANDING couNSEL FoR GRAM Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] PANCHAYAT [OPUC]

7. Two CD CoPies BM Nr 6 HIGH COURT DATED:0911012025 .1:1;- Sh o() i 2 JAN 2O2E .a) * A\l.,aTCH',i, COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.29886 ,29888 & 29891 OF 202li DISPOSING OF ALL THE WRIT PETITIC NS WITHOUT COSTS I a'