✦ High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,036 words

Acts & Sections

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRl. G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDy SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE B' VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITT ON No. 29901of2025 ORDER(ORAL): This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliet "...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature ol Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondcnt No'2 in itrri"g the impugned unnumbered Notice vide No' UC/C iin.p-slcnrrac tzozi aatea n-0g-202s in respect of the property of the pctitioner in Plot No.99 North Part admeasuring 77'77 Square Yards or l,q.ir"f.* to 65.0 Square Meters in Survey No 204/2 consisling u'ith Stilt fo. Parking plus 2 Upper Floor to an extent of 60'38 Sq meters ri,r""d at MadJenaguda Viilage Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy Oir,.i", u. illegal aibitrary arid in violation of Principlcs of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14,,16, 19' 21 and 300-A oi Constitution of India and set aside thc same Consequcntly direct the .esfonde.rt No 2 not to interfering into the p"1"f'l possession and enjoy of the petitioner over his property bearing Plot No'99 North Paft admlasuring'77.77 Square Yards or equivalent to 65-0 Square Meters io.zO+tzconsisting with Stilt lor.Parking plus 2 Upper Floor ili;"y toun"*t",tof60.33sqmererssituatedatMadeenagudaVillage Seritingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District .""

2. Heard Mr. V.R. Mannepalli, leamed counsel for the petitioner; Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, leamed Standing Counsel fbr GHMC' appearing for respondent No 2; and perused the material on record' Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 3. obtained the building permission through self certification vide Flle .- 2 BVR. J wp_2990t 2025 No.00 105 l/GHIvIC/0O37811NC2112025, dated 23.07.2U25 in respecr of the propertv bearing Plot No.99 North part, admeasuring 77.77 square yards in Sur,re), No.20412, situated at Madeenaguda Village, Serilingampally Vandal, Ranga Reddy District and he constructed building compri:,ing of Stilt for parking + 2 upper floors admeasuring

60.-i8 square rnt:ters in the subject property in accordance with the sanctioncd plan. However, without proper verification, the irnpugned show causc nori,:e dated 17.09.2025 was issued to the petitioner, which is i. violation ol'principles of natural justice. As such, the petitioner rvas constrainccl to approach this Court.

4. Leamed Strnding Counsel for GHMC submitted that if any action is to be take^ aga ,st the petitioner, due process of law will be followed.

5. In the circ r.r mstances, without going into the merits of the case, this u,rit petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 not to interf'ere witl-r tht: construction undertaken by the petitioner without follou'ing due p*rcess of law. However, the petitioner is directed to subnrit replv to the show cause norice dated, 17.09.2025 within a period of scven (7) dair; from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt ol such reply, respondent No.2 shall conduct necessary 3 BvR' J rvp-29901-2025 of hearing to the petitioner and pass e with law within a period of four (4) enquiry, bY giving oPPortunitY apProPriate orders in accordanc weeks thereafter There shall be no order as to costs' As a sequel thereto' miscellaneous aPPlications if anY Pending this writ Petltlon' shall stand closed S -K.BH AVANI SWAMY TANT REG ST IITRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER "' l:,,?:*,'*t$TtH1i J:ffikl":#ilffi *:''" 2 one cc to sRr' "til[';t;"^* 1t^'::^t" 'High 3 one cc to sRr- lH;:;;;rMN ,RBAN D Iv'urL "- ^ i:gfr*::,35{o" 5. Two CD Copies court ror the stale ot NlBC GJP s HIGH COURT DATED:26/09/2025 ORDER WP.No.29901 of 2025 tr, L) 0 0 rr' \,:i. \.r '.\ lr.. \'\'-'/r):- WRIT PETI ION IS DISPOSED OF WITH OUT (:]OST q

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments