✦ High Court of India · 10 Feb 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 10 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
10 Feb 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,231 words

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondent No.2 to consider the Dharani application Dated OBlO7l2024. vide No 2400055576 wherein requested for the correctien of the nature of Land as Patta in the Dharani portal and the Pattadhar passbook in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.0.20 Gts, in Sy.No.76/3/1, situated at Pudur Village and Mandal, Vikarabad District pending disposal of the Writ Petition. 4 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER l ^.:, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.30639 of 2024 ORDER: This writ petition has been frled seeking to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not considering the Dharani Application No.240005.5576 dated Oa.O7.2024 submitted by the petitioner seeking correction of entries in the Dharani Portal in respect of land admeasuring Ac.O.20 guntas in Survey No.76/3/l situated at Pudur Village'and Mandal, Vikarabad District, as patta land which was wrongly entered as Larruni patta inspite of Memo dated

07.06.2024 vide No.E2l5812O2O issued by respondent No.2 wherein it was directed to treat the land admeasuring Ac.4.35 guntas in Survey No.76 situated at Pudur Village and Mandal, Vikarabad District as patta land and to delete the same from the 22-A list, as illegal and arbitrary and for other appropriate reliefs

2. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.O.20 guntas in Survey No.76/3/l situated at Pudur Village and 2 \ Mandal, Vikarabad District, having acquired the same from his father. It is stated that he has been issued new pattadar pass book vide pass book No.T0TLSOL2OOB6 wherein the nature of land is wrongly mentioned as assigned land. It is stated that even though the nature of the subject land has been classified in all the revenue records as patta land, the respondent authorities without taking them into consideration, have not only rvrongly mentioned the classification of the subject land in'ihe pattadar pass book as assigned land but also included the entire land admeasuring Ac.4.35 guntas in Surwd No.76 in the 22-A register without issuing aly notification or proceedings, which constrained the petitioner to submit application dated 17.11.2023 on the llle of respondent No.2 who in turn made enquiry and issued a Memo dated

07.06.2024 vide No.E2l58/2020 directing respondent No.3 herein to take necessa{/ action for deleting the lands in Survey No.76 from 22-A register by treating the same as patta land. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the same and even though he submitted application in Dharani portal on O8.O2.2024 vide Application ,/ \ \ J No.24OOo55576 seeking to change the nature of subject land from sarkari to patta and to delete the sa;re from 22- A register, so far no action has been taken thereon.

3. A counter afhdavit has been filed by respondent No.5 i.e., the Tahsildar, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District, inter alia stating that acting upon the application of the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and on verification of records, it was revealed that Survey No.76 to an extent of Ac.4.35 guntas is recorded in the revenue records as patta land from the pahanies for the year 7970-71 to till date and as such the application of the petitioner t was duly recommended and forwarded by responcient Nos.3 to 5 to the District Collector, Vi!<arabad i.e., respondent No.2 herein and the same is pending for approval.

4. In view of the above and since it is specifically stated that the petitioner's application has been acted upon by respondent Nos.3 to 5 and the same is pending for the approval of respondent No.2 for re-classification of the subject land as patta land, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to pass necessary orders of / 4 approval in accordance with law and thereafter, respondent No.S shall make necessary corrections in the revenue records by changing the classification of the subject land as patta lald and'issue amended pass books in favour of the petitioner. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within four rveeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any' shall stand closed. There shall be rro order as to costs' //TRUE COPY// SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISfANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana, State Of Telangana.

2. The Distrrct collector, Vikarabad District At lntegrated District offices Complex. Parigi Road, Parigi Village, Vikarabad District.

3. The Additional collector, Vikarabad District At lntegrated District offices Complex, Parigi Road, Parigi Village, Vikarabad District"

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad District 5. The Thasildhar, Pudur Mandal pudur village and mandal, Vikarabad District. 6. One CC to SRI K PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 7 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 8 BSR GJP Two CD Copies I 'l'! -.1:.-=-' ;i rHi sre it (o (- Ti: 11 llAn 2[6 oqc.3Pai !'r',: ) * 4 HIGH COURT DATED: 1010212025 ORDER WP.No.30639 of 2024 o C I t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS cgo?'', $,, \\ 3 x^ \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments