The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in the above said crime case vide FIR No.844 of 2024 against the petitioner/Accused on the file of P S CHAITANYAPURI, RACHAKONDA. ... Respondents l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crime case vide FIR No.B44 ot 2024 against the petitioner/Accused on the file of P S CHAITANYAPURI, RACHAKONDA. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that r the circumstances stated in the Petition, the High Court may be please to e> t :nd the interim order dated 08 11 2024 in LA.No.2 ot 2024 in crlp 13348 of 2024 r I til for orders l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 AND LA.No.4 OF 2025 BETWEEN: Ramavath Ramesh Naik, S/o Pikya Naik, Aged about 36 y: rrs, Occ - Fast Food Centre. R/o H.No.17-1-39'1l40/A, Singareni Colony, Saidatr d, Hyderabad ...Petitic r er/Respondent No.2 AND 1 N Raju, S/o Late. N. Rajalingam, Aged about 50 y rars. Occ - Business, R/o H.No.11-15-136, Doctor's Colony, Road No.5, l"cthapet. Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor , I Iigh Court at Hyderabad ...RespondenUPe:i :ioner/Accused No.'t ...Responc r nURespondent No.1 l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 w 359(6) of Cr.P.C praying tha: n the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the Petition, the High I rurt may be pleased to permit the petitioner and De-facto Complainant /respond,: rt no 2 to compound the offences in FlR.No.844 of 2024 dated 22.10.2024 on i i file of chaitanypuri police station Rachakonda (Ranga Reddy) and quash he proceedings by compounding the offence. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 rlw 359(6) of Cr P C rraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the P(l tion, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between the f etitioners and and defato complaint /respondent No.2 in FIR no.844 of 2024 da'.r d 22 10.2024 on the file ps chaitanyapuri Police station Ranga Reddy Di:;-ict an quash the proceedings. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing re Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumr,r ts of Sri M/s.Konda srinivas, Advocate for the Petitioner, the Additional Public p r secutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri N Krishna Sumanth, Advoca .r ior the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI LA.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.13348 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused to quash the proceedings against him in Crime No.844 of 2024 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1Xr)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act,2015.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the I offences- \ {

3. Vide order dated 08.10.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a repo(

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal 2 i tt i;.: Services Committee, has identified the parties : .rd submitted a report, dated 14.10.2025 and the same is placecl c n record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2)>_5 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is all: ried and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in O irne No.B44 of 2024 of Chaitanyapuri police Station, Rachako r la, are hereby quashed. lt/liscellaneous applications, if any pendrr 3, shall stand closed I,D/-L VIJAYA LAXMI AS!; STANT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, I I

1. The lV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate cum IVAJCJ : I L.B.Nagar, Racahkonda Hyderabad (OUT)

2. The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Statior, lachakonda 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Srz :e of Telangana at 4. One CC to Srl Konda Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Srr N Krishna Sumanth, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies ADI(ABK Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise HIGH COURT DATED:2411012025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.13348 ot 2024 ,....,. 05 ,2025 ::)' ALLOWING THE CRLP AND tA.NOs.3 6, 4 OF 2O2S ct6 -1' MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION (Under Section 528 r/w 359 (6) Cr.P.C.).) IN THE HIGI] COURT OF ruDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA IA.No Crl.P.No 13348 of 2025 of2024 Betweeu Ramavath Ramesh Naik, S/o Pikya Naik, Aged about 36 years, Occ.: Fast Food Centre, R/o H.No.l7-1 -3911401A, Singareni Colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad l. N. Raju, S/o Late. N. Ra.lalingam, And Aged about 50 years, Occ.: Business, R/o H.No. I l-15-136, I)octor's Colony, Road No.5, I(othapet, Hyderabad . . . Petitioner/Resp onden t-2 ... Respondents /... Petitioncr/Accused Nos.l ). 1 2 Staleol'Telarrgana, l{epresented by Public Prosecutor, High Courl at Hyderabad, Hvderrhad .. . Respondent/Respondent- 1 JorNT MEM. I am the 2ND Respondent/ Defacto Complainant herein and as such I am well acquainted with the facts of the case. It is submitted that the above criminal perition is filed under Section 52g of B N S S praying for quashing of the proceedings in Crime case vide F.l.R. No. 844 of 2024 dt.22.10.2024 on the file of Chaitanyapuri police Station, Ranga Reddy District. AD d,4 tt\ 3 The above FIR arose in view of the complaint datt.r 20 10.2024 filed by th Respo'dent No. 2/ Deiacto complainant beforc tlr Station House offir:er, chaitanyapuri Police station and registered as ; .I.R. No. g44 of 2024 agai,st the Pctitioner:s herein fbr the offe,ces u/s r- lder sections 3 (1) ( r ) ( s ) of SC ST (POA) Amendment Act. 20 15.

4. It is submitted that the petitioner and the Res r r,dent No. 2/ Detacto complainart irave agreed among thernselves to r:solve all the disputes arnicabll, and withclraw all the criminal proce: lings initiated by rhe Rcs1r6n61g111 \rr. I ;'1.,i.,o Complainanr. 5 In view of the sante, the Respondent No.2/ Defacto I omplainant is intending to r.vithdraw the conrplaint filed by it which was re.r i ;lered as F.LR. No. 844 ot 2024 dt 22.10.2024 on the file of Chaitanyapu i Police Statron, Ranga Reddy District. This IIon'ble Courr may be plea; :cl to quash all further- proceedings F.l.R. No. 844 of 2024 against thepetit r ner as compounded. 6 It is respcctlully submitted that, the petitioner anc -he Respondent No. 2/ Defacto Cornplainant both herein agreed to settle t re disputes among the patties inter .re and shall not raise any further dispu t :s in furlherance of tl're proceedrngs in F.I.R. No. 844 of 2024 and a1.r :ed to withdraw any allegations made against each other uncondittor L lly. All the disputes between the parlies stands finally resolved and t rere is no ill will rtr complarnt against each other rn any manner. ).Lo zL.I {_.. l. lt is further subrnitted that the parties with their mutual consent and free will without any pressure, force, coercion or undue influence from any side, have agrecd to end all their disputes fully and to live peacefulty. lt is here by submitted that the Respondent No. 2/ Defacto Complainant IS willing to withdraw the allegations against the Petitioner/ Accused, in vierv of the compromise, all the lurther proceedings in F.I.R. No. 844 of 2024 dt 22 10 2024 on thc flle of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Ranga Redd5, District, are Iiable to be cluashed to meet the ends ofjustice It is therclore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the compromrse and quash the proceedings in F.I.R. No. 844 of 2024 dt. 22.10.2024 on the file of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Ranga Reddy District, and to pass such othcr order or orders as this IIon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in tire circumstances of the case i\I Responden tl+loner- 1 Co HYDERABAD, DT:22.08.2025 ya il,,,' Petitioner/R2 Corrra"t # en No2