The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the Arrest of the Petitioner/Accused herein in Crime No.26412024 on the file of PS Kazipet, Warangal for the offences UlSec. 127(21, 75(2), 351 (2) BNS 9 (a) iv, 9 (c), r/w 10 POCSO Act.2012 l.A.Nos.1 &2 o'' 2025 l.A. NO: 1 OF 2t)25 Between: 9r Chal,rr Pradeep Kumar, S/o. Chada Dasaratham Reddy Aged about 48 Years, O<:c Consultant Pathologist Kakaji Colony, Hanmarbndi. Warangal ... Petitioner/RespondenUDefacto Complainant AND

1. Ravi ),.umar S/o. Late Rajaiah Aged about 45 years Occ Service R/o B_ 403, Lake Vrew Towers, Waddepatty, Hanmakonda Warangal District.

2. The Slate of Tetangana, Rep by its public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderirbad ... RespondenUPetitioner/Accused ...RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, lhe High Court may be pleased to permit the complainant to compound the offenie in Crime No.26412O24 on the f,le of PS Kazipet, Warangal, for the offences UtSec. 127(2), 7_5(Z), 351 (2) BNS 9 (a) iv, 9 (c), r/w 10 POCSO Act ?O12 against ine Petrtioner/Accus ed in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition ulder Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the Me morandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to rocord the compromise in the above criminal petition and quash the Crime No.2ti412j24 on the file of pS Kazipet, Warangal. for the offences UtSec 127(2),','5(2),351 (2) BNS 9 (a) iv, 9 (c), r/w 10 POCSO Actz}l|z. by compounding thr) offence in terms of compromise in the interes: ofjUStice. This Petit on coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of (;riminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Kadire Ajith Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and the Addrlionat publrc Prosecutor on l)ehalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sr A.padma Chary, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Nos.1 & 2 ot 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.13345 ot 2024 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in Crime/FlR No 264 of 2024 on the file of the Station House Officer, Kazipet, Warangal Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 127(2),75(2),351(2) of BNS 9 (a), (iv), 9 (c), r/w 10 of POCSO Act,2012

02. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused as well as respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petrtion, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences

03. Vide orders dated 02 09 2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective learned counsel to appear before the Secretary, Hrgh Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report I , I 2 04 Pursuant to the above said directron issued by this Court, the par-ties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Sbrvices Committee, has rdentified the parties and submitted repcrl dated 08 09 2025 and the same are plac€rd on record.

05. ln view of the above, lA.Nos.1 & :2 of 2025 are allowed Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the procr:edings against the petitioner-accused in Crime/FlR No.264 t>f 2024 on the file of the Station House Officer, Kazipet,'/Varangal Police Station, are hereby qLrashed As a sequel, miscellaneous applicatrons, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// . SD/. P PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The First Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Hanamkonda 2 The Stat on House Officer, Kazipet Police Station, Warangal 3 Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State c,f Telangana at 4 One CC to Sri Kadire Ajith Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC :o Sri A Padma Chary, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD 3opies Hyderat ad [OUT] ABK/GR Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise HIGH COURT OATED: 12/09,2025 COMMON ORt)ER l.A.Nos. 1&2tf 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.13345 of 2024 ALLOWING TF E l.A.Nos.1 and 2 AND CRIMINAL PEI]TION @ d 1r i) a. ); ;-'-\ 'L',.\' '.(,, \\a\ |l sEP 20fi ' 1 \ \.. I t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA - AT HYDERABAD I.A.NO. oF 2025 IN CRLP.No.13345 OF ZO24 BETWEEN; Dr.Chada Pradeep Kumar S/o. Chada Dasaratham Reddy Aged about 48 Years, Occ: Consultant pathologist, Kakaji Colony, Hanmakonda. Warangal District. Petitioner/Respondent/ Defacto Complainant AND

1. Ravi Kumar S/o.Late Rajaiah Aged about 45 Years, Occ: Service R:/o: 8-403, Lake View Towers, Waddepally, Hanmakonda Warangal District. ... Respondent/Petitioner/Accused

2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ... Respondent/Complainant JOINT MEMO FIIED BY THE P DEFA -coM PTAINANT ONERS AND I May it please your lordship,

1. It is to submit that the allegation of the complaint is that the defacto complainant given a complaint before the police Station: Kazipet stating that alleged incident had taken place on 09.10.2024 but the complaint was lodged on 22.10.2024 and thereafter and the police registered as Crime No.26412024 on the file of PS Kazipet, Warangal for the offences Ulsec. 127(2), 75(2),35t (2) BNS 9 (a) ia 9 (c), rlw t0 POCSO Act.20t2 and took up the investigation. 6 That Petitioner and Defacto_Complainant respectfully submit that, the above matter is settled out of the Court to wi .hdraw and not to prosecute the criminal case and that this Hcn'ble Court may be pleased to Quash the Crime No.26412024 on the file of pS Kazipet, Warangal, for the offences U/Sec. 127(2), 7s(2),351 (2) BNS 9 (a) iv, 9 (c), r/w 10 pOCSO 4d..2012, by compounding the offence in terms of compromise in :he interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances oi'the case. \ Hence, this loint Memo. Hyrlerabad DAIE:L\402.2025 i til'\ & CoL nsel for Petitioner f 'h -9,+n- Counsel for Respondent /to Petitioner/ I Respondent/Defacto Complainant 7