The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 133 of 2025 on the frle of the Hon'ble X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad, against the Petitioner /Accused. l.A. No. 1 oF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioner /Accused rn in C.C.No. 133 of 2025 on the file of the Hon'ble X Additional Chief lVletropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad, pending disposal of the above criminal petition. l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 LA. No. 2 oF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit me to compound the offences with the Accused and quash the proceedings against the Accused in C.C.No.133 of 2025 on the Hon'ble X Additional Chief lt/etropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad., in the interest of justice. l.A. No. 3 oF 2025 Between: Samsad Ansari, S/o- Kalamuddin Ansari, Aged about 25 Years, Occ. Electrician. R/o. Adithya Nagar Colony, Hafeezpet, Hyderabad Native of Dumarikhas, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. ...Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant V/s

1. The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. ...Respondent No.1 2. Dinesh Laungani, S/o. Rajan Laungani, Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Business Resident of Plot No 19 A, Jyothi Nagar Colony, Road No. 2, Kakaguda, Secunderabad. ...Petitioner/Accused Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromrse the Respondent No. 2/ Defacto complainant to compound the offence with the Respondent No. 2/Accused and quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused in C C 133 of 2025 on the Hon'ble X Additional Chief Metropolitan lvlagistrate, at Secunderabad, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T Jayant Jaisoorya, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri J.Dheeraj Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.'12719 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.'133 of 2025 on the file of learned X Additional Chief l\Ietropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, registered for the offence under Section 106 of BNS

2. Heard Sri T. Jayant Jaisoorya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Sri J. Dheeraj Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitroner- accused as well as respondent No.2-de faclo complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to permit respondent No.2 to compound the offence and to record compromise

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petition. 2 ETD.J Crl.P.No.l2il9 of202i t

5. Perused the affidavit filed by the de faclo complainant l.A.No.3 o'f 2025, which discloses that he has willingly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the Secretary, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, vlde order, dated 26.09.2025, passed by this Court

6. Pursuanl to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Committee has identifled the parties and submitted a report, dated 09.10.2025, stating that the parties were identified and they have wilfully and without any coercion entered into compromrse

7. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.133 ol 2025 on the file of learned X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, against the petitioner- accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner-accused paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the J ETD,] Crl P No 12719 of202i State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY// SD/. C, DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The X Additional Chief Judicial Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad 2. The Station House Officer, lrilarredpally Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

4. One CC to Sri T Jayant Jaisoorya, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri J.Dheeraj Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies u. ABK/PSL I Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri T Jayant Jaisoorya, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order daled 27-10-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Secretary, High court Legal Services Committee, High court for the state of Telangana and Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance vide USR No. 4129 of 2025 dated 09-0'l-2026. \ I HIGH COURT DATED: 2711012025 IHE S .:, )J o Y * 0 2 iIB 2026 z C) t COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.12719 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.2 & 3 OF 2025 U,i-1 n I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TDLANGANA AT:: FIYDERABAD (MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION FILED u/s 528 OF BNSS) ' Crl,P.No. OF 2025 (X Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad) *tllllT,o,' " " Between: - Dinesh Laungani S/o. Rajan Laungani, Aged about 4O Years, Occ: Business Resident of Plot No. 19 A, Jyothi Nagar Colony, Road No. 2, Kakaguda, Secunderabad v/s.

1. The State of Telalgana through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. Samsad Ansari S/o. I(alamuddin Ansui, Aged about 25 Yeras, Occ: Electricial, R/o. Adithya Nagar Colony, Haleez.pet, Hyderabad Native of Dumarikhas, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh ... PETTTTONER/ACCUSED RT]SI'ONDtrNT NO.1 RESPONI)ENT NO.2/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT. JOINT i\4EMO f. it is submitted that the Petitioners/Accu sed herein filed the present joint memo to compound the offences between Petitioners and Respondent No.2 as the matter is settled out of court amicably. )w \ilqB l+s?i' :'l .ii '.ti ::1 ..i'{ ^.*hffi

2. Whereas the Defacto complainant/ Respondent No. 2 herein filed a case in C.C. 133 of 2025 on the Hon'ble X Additiona-l Chief Metr cpolitah Magistrate, at Secunderabad. .

3. It is submitted t]"at the matter is settled out of court at the insta;rce of both t}re parties and elders. One of the offences is non-compoundable, but the parties herein enter into compr{fnise. The Respondent No. ? / Defacto Complainant herein voluntarilyi,r:ndertook to compromise' tltc matter. Hence. the quash pel ition may bqrallowed. , , . ., J . . r^-r1 , . -, .iFri 4. Whereas t-he Respondent No. 2 i/ Defacto complainant .ralso filed her alhdavit disclosing her willingnessi for the compromise,along with this joint memo as part of this recorci. J : " Respondent No. 2 <nalyxzh Counsel for t6,, Rqrp,ondent No.2 \ Counsel for 1L--"' thb' Petitioner/Accused l : I