The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularlyin the nature of a Writ of N/andamus declaring the action of the Respondeni Nos.2 to 5 in not considering the representations of the Petitioner dated '12.03.2025,09.04.2025, 12.05.2025, and Bhu Bharathi Application dated 21 .06.2025 bearing App|.No.RS2500482538 and 19.03.2025 and 12.O5.2025 to conduct enquiry and correct revenue records and incorporate the Petitioner's name with respect to an extent of land a&neasuring Ac 0-21 Gts (out of Ac 1-00 Gts) in Sy.Nos.272A ol Koheda Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District not to register any transaction with respect to the said land till such correctior s are carried out, as illegal, arbitrary. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the cir:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cour. may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to consider the representa.ions of the petitioner dated 12.03.2025, og.o4.2o2s, 12.05.202s, and Bhu Bharathi Apptication dated 21 .06.2025 bearing Appl.No.RS250048253B and 19.03.2025 and 12.05.2025 to conduct enquiry and correct revenue records and incorpc rate the petitioner,s name with respect.to.an extent of land admeasuring Ac 0-2. Gts (out of Ac 1_00 Gts) in Sy.Nos.272A of Koheda Village, Abdullapurmet t,4andal, Rangareddy District, not to register any transaction with respect to thr: said land till such corrections are carried out, pending disposal of the present wrir. petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D ANIKETH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGp APPEARING ON BEHALF OF GP FOR REVENUE SRI K. MURALIDHAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER D l'!t THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No. 29651 of 2o25 ORDER: The present u.rit petition is filed b1,r the petitioner under Article 226 of tlne Constitution of india fcr the ibllori,ing rclel : ".,.to issues order or direction. more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Manclamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 ro S in not considering the representations of the Pe titioner dated 12.O3.2025, 09.O4.2025, 12.O5.2O25 and Bhu Bharathi Application datcd 21.A6.2O25 Appi.No.RS250O482538 and 19.03.2O25 and i2.O5.2O25 to conduct enquin, and correct revenue recorcis and incorpol':rte thr. i)e r.itirx:e. s name u,ith respect to an extent of lancl adnicz:suririg Ac.O-2 i Gts (out of Ac.1- 00 Gts.,) in Sy.No,272A of Kohed>. Village, Abdullapurrnet Mandal, Rangareddv Disrricr rlr to rrgister any transactiorr wilh respect to rhc sald lar-icl tril such corrections arc carried out, as illeqal, arbitrar-r

2. Heard Sri D.Anikcth Recidv. iearned counsel for ihe petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader appearing on behalf o[ learned (ior,.ernrnent pleader for Revenue Sri K-Muralidhar Redciv a

3. The learned counsei lor the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possrssor of land admeasuring Ac.1-OO guntas in Sv.No 272A anci Ac.O OJ Eaun r€rs in S5-.No.273AA, Koheda Village, having purchased the san're under a regislered saie deed dated 18.02.1995, document l,lo.2bO2 of 1995, execured bv Smt.Fatima Begum ancl olhers, duly r-egistered ar the ofhce of the Sub- Registrar, Hyderaba<1 itrasr) Muration proceedings \r.ere dul1, effected and pattadar passl5c,'<s :, )lri :rl_Nc.24:.l.l l ! r i l 3,i l g, pa a No_2 l B Neu. ) Pase 2 ol4 No.T05010230069) were issued in the petitioner's ['avcur, r.r'hich are also reflected in the 1-B ROR (a) is lurthcr submitted that sul's:qucnrl1 . r:erLain individuals claiming under Late Sri Pujari Ra-illaiah Gouci filed O.S.No. 175 of 20'22 beiore the learned IV Additional Sicnior Civii .Iudge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, seeking decla: zrtion of ou'nership over Ac.2-16 guntas in Sy.No.272, Koheda Village. Luring the pe ndency of the said suil, the petitioner discovered that ris 1:rnd htrcl been converted fron-r agricultural to non agricultural usr: ,r'iihcut his consent or application. Upon enquiry, il r,r'as revealed that. s r,:h c onvcrsiori n as obtained frauclulently, leading the petitioner to.lo(licss r': prcse n'.:r ticns dated 24.O1.2O25 and O3.O2.2O25 seeking clarifir:i ! on- The said suit rvas later dismissed lor default on 73.C2.2023. (b) It is furthcr submitted that to his .,-yther shock, the petiLioner discovcrcd through Dharani Portal ti-:rl his holding in iiy'.iio.272A vras arbitrar-il_v re,Juced fi-om Ac. i-01) F;irni.is to Ac.O- 1Ll gL,.n tas by dcCucting Ac-0-2 1 guntas without nr)r..clr or justrfic:rtion. Cor-rsequenlly, r:-tulliple representations \\,ere mrr,k: tc the rr:venue authorilies secking correction of rccords, follor,veC b',' a Bhu Birarathi application dau:d 2i.06.2025, all of w'hich remarn u:r zrclcd upon. (,:) Further, the petitioner addressed re F re senr,atlon s dateci

19.03.2O25 and 12.O5.2025 to Respoadent No.i-. nr.rLiirsl.ing Lhat n() Paqr .l of -l registrations be entertained concerning thc disputed extent of Ac.O-21 guntas in Sy.No.272A until rectiltcation of records. These representations too elicited no response. The Encumbrance Certiltcate obtained by the petitioner clearl.v evidences his ou'nershlp over Ac. l-O0 guntas in Sy.No.2724, yet discloses an unauthoriscd NALA conversion (Transaction No.240O522626) effectecl u'ithout his consent. Further information obtarned under the RTI Act revealed Che ck Memo No.B/ 1581/2O24 and NALA Conversion Proceedings No B/262612024 dated 21.08.2O24, confirming that sucl-i conversion orders we re issued rvi thout lawful authority. (d) Further submi[s rhat despitc repezrlecl represe n tat.ions and rlocumentary proof, respondent Nos.2 [o 5 have failed to take an-v action to rectify the records or prevent unlawful transactions- The petitioner submits that such inaction is illegal, arbitrary and vioiative of principles of natural justice and unless the responde#ts are directed to conduct an enquiry and restore the putitloner s name in the revenue records, he r.vill suffer irreparable loss and in-iury not compensable in n)onetary lerms.

4. The learned Assistant (iovernment Pleader, representing Iearned Government Pleader fcr Revenue submits that the petitioner has already avarled remedies under Lhe Bhu Bharathi system and that the competent revenue authorities are .Ixpo\\'ered to eramine and Page 4 of4 rec S- such grievances ihrough prescribed adminr;L:ative procedures. I t is therelore con tendeci that the petitioner may be ciirccred to make a fresh, comprchcnsive aDplication before the co tr:ernr:d allthoril\-, furnishing alI re levant docume nts, whereupon I r,: 5,:11s shilll be considercd in accordance u'ith law.

5. In vievi. of the above submissions zlrrd p:rrticularlv the submission maclc by learned counsel for the petttir ner that ther. ha','e aireariv subinitrei an appiication under the provisir n,.: ot Bhu Bharail. this Cou:'- decn-is it appropriate to dispose of the u.rit petltton ciirecting re.,eituc auiitcrr;,,t:s to examlne a-ni j corlsicjai i::r req,..: r s t,,/:r ppLiciltton oi rhc peritioner if it is iounri in oi-cicr anii pa:,s appropriate ordcrs in accordance r-ith law by isstrir g notices to al1 the concerneci and r:ffccted parties and affording ihrn, rrn lpDorturiit-.' of being heard as r:xpedir,iously as possibie.

6. With ihe above obserwations,.this Writ i,e :-itio:-r is cii-sDo-sec' ,rl'. Ihe:-, :h:ll l .lc,):,i,r Ja'r.csts As .-: scquel. :hc miscelian.olrs petiti(.,i s oe:tciing, il an"r. shall st.r r, <i cit,.scd ,TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSSTANT REGPTRAR SEcTIoNKFIcER To, 1 The Principal Secretarv Revenue Department, Secretar at building, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad. The.Collector and District Magistrate, Rangareddy Distri,)t. District Collectorate, Kongara ko tan. dr rigir:jodi' di:ffii' " "' z j I 3- The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnam Division. 4. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy Diskict. 5. The Sub-Reiistrar,'pedda Amberpet, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District.

6. One CC to SRt D ANTKETH REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana touTl B. Twb CD Copies PVL GJP ) I HIGH COURT DATED:31 11012025 \ \ i ORDER WP.No.29651 of 2025 ," t) i- t:a' t'- s 14 Ie 2d t{oy 2E 2 F a a Dl \ * ;Cx+E0 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS