Mr. Pujari Venugopal Goud v. The State of Telangana, Revenue Department

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particuldrly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus dectaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 and Respondent No.5 in not considering the representations of the Petitioner dated 12.03.2025, 09.04.2025, '12.05.2025, and .Bhu Bharathi Application dated 21 .06.2025 bearing Appl.No.RS25004B 1706 and 19.03.2025, 12.05.2025 respectively to coriduct enquiry and correct revenue records and incorporate the Petitioners name rtith respect to an extent of land admeasuring Ac 0-21 Gts (out of Ac O-24 Gts) in Sy.Nos.272AA of Koheda Village, Abcfullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy District not to register any transaction with rr:s.pect to the said land till such corrections are carrred out, as illegal, arbitrary. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr, ,:ircumstances stated in the aff idavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc uft may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 and Respondent lJo.5 to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 12.O3.2025, Og.O4.)-O25, 12.05.2025, and Bhu Bharathi Application dated 2'1 .06.2025 bearing Appl.trlo.RS2500481706 and 19.O3.2025, 12.05.2025 respectively to conduct enquiry and correct revenue records and ,nroor'porate the Petitioners name with respect to an extent of tand admeasuring Ac O-21 Gts (out of Ac O-24 Gts) in Sy.lrro s.2T2AA of Koheda Village, Abdullapurmet lrrlandal, Rangareddy District, ntt to register any transaction with respect to the said land till such corrections are carried out. pending disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D ANIKETH REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L RAVINDER AGp App=ARING ON BEHALF OF GP FOR REVENUE SRI K MURALIDHAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER a THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.29652 of 2025 ORDER: The prcscnt u,rit petition is filcd by the petitioner undcr Article 2 26 of the Constitution o[ India se eking issuance of a writ of Mandamus dcclaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 and rcspondent No.5 in not considering the representations of the petitioner darccl 12.ti3.2O25, i9.03.20'25, 09.O4.2025 and 12.05.2025 and thc []hu Btrar;rriri Applicaticn dated 21.06.2025 (Appi. No. RS25[tOa8 1706) anrl io direc:t lne respondents to consider Lhe above saicl f(:pt-cscnlalions and conduct an enquiry, rectify the rcvenue recor'ds anc! incorporatc thc petitioner's name in rcspect of land measurinq Ac 0-2 i !{ts., oul oi Ac.O-24 gts., in S1-.No.272AA, Koheda Village, Ab<lullapurmet Mandal, Rangarecid-v-- Dis*'ricl and furlher restr:lin reslistration oi' irnr transaction concel-nrng rhe said lAnd pending such r:orrcction erncl disposal of this writ petltion.

2. itc:rrcl Sri D.Aniketh Recldr'- iearned counsel lor l.he pclir roner rrrrrl Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govcrttment Pleadcr erppearing on bchaif of learned Governnlent Plcader for Revenue Sri K. \4 rrra lidhzrr Rcdrir,. -!- Pagc 2 o1 -l

3. Tht: iearned counsel for the petitionr r sucmits that the prcsent writ nctitrolt assails r.he inaction o[ respr, rrlcnrs No.2 to 5 in failir-rg to considr,r trc y;ctittoner's representation: :latcd I2.03.2O25.

19.O3.2025. 09.0.1.2025. 12.Or2025 and rhe Bhu ilharathi Application dated 2 1. O6. 20-2 5 r,ide Appl icir tion No. R-s25O048 1 7,)(>, sr:eking enqurry, rectrficatlon of rcvenuc i-ecords and incorporatiot of the petitioner's name in rcspect r>l land mezlsurinq Ac.O-2 I gts our ]l Ac.O-24 gts., in Sy.tr'o.272,$ oi' Kohecla Vill:rgc, Abclullapurmet i\ :rtrdal, Rang:rrcddv District and to r cstrnin regi-stration oi an\. transacrtil)ns rolating thercto. Thc petitioner. :rbsirli-rlc olr ner aud possessor ()i Ac.O-24 gts n Sy No.272AA ancl ,\c.O (;.; gis Lii Sr.No 271), bv virt'-L' ol a registered gilr deed dated 04.O3.2O)) cxer:r-rtei br. his mc.ircr, Smt. Pujari Mangamma, clisc'ovcrcd r:h,ti i\,itilollt n()1tce or cot)s,cnt, an extent of Ac.0 21 gts., Iionr hls :rr,.,.irrir1 iLa,C bcen unaul-hori ;crlly deducted and con,/crted to norr agricuitur,li r.isc De spitc rnuitiple .rprcsentations and an ;rpplicarion under thc Bl'rr,r Bharathi Portal, thr rcspondents have L'riie C ro initiatr: citquin ,.)i i-csr orc Lhe r.orrccr cntrit:l . (a) Th( ic:lrrecl (ir)Lllrscl ior tltc pctitioner i onlcnds that suc:h inaction is illcsi:1. .lrbilr:rC, and ..,iolatiye of hr s pr6perq' righrs. \\'ar|an[ins thrs Cor-iit :j iir t('r,,ii]lii)it ,, rliaeat :tL(. respondeats Lo con side,{. thc L: [i,l-cs.tiC :i'i]'csr'n', ai iiar 1-rs i.ordi;L--t ci, rr: cllcluin-, r-rorrccl I'asc 3 ()f I the revenuc records and incorporaLe his name for the rightful extent, pending disposal of the Writ Pctirion.

4. Thc iearncd Assistant Government plcader, representing lcarned ()ol'er,me.t Pleader lor Revenue submits that the petitioner has already availcd remedies under the Bhu Bharathi s.ystem and that the competent rcvenue authorities are empowered to examine and rectift. such gricv:rnces through prescribed administrative procedures. It is the rcforo contcncieC tita t the petitioner may be dirccted to make a fresh, comprchensivc application before the concerned authority, furnishing all relevant documents,. whereupon the same shall be consrdered in accorclancc u'ith larv.

5. I n vieu. of the above submissions and particularly the submission made b-r' learncd counsel for the petitioner that they have alreadl, submirtcd an application undcr the provisionr of Bhu-Bharati, this Court deems it appropriate to drspose of the u,rit petition directing the re\ieltLlc airihoi-itiis t(., examrne and consider the request/ applicatio n of the petitioner if it is found,in ordcr and pass appropriate ordcrs in accordancc with lar.r. by issuing notice s ro all the concerned ancl effectcd parties and affording them an opportunity of being heard as expccii[iousi',, as possible. -./ .- \-'" l'a!r! J Lri {

6. With the above obsen atior-rs, this wri, pctir ion is disposed of. There sh:rll }te no orcier as l() costs.

7. As ir scquei. rhe rnisc:cllaneous petii;:ns pr:nding. if an1., shail stand r:losr.d //TRUE COPY// SC,/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGfSTRAR // ,,- tL \-,/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Secretariat building, State of l'elangana, Revenue Department, Ffurderabad.

2. The Collector and District Magistrate, Rangareddy Distrit;t, District Collectorate, Kongarakolan, Rangareddy District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, lbrahimpatnarn Divisrc n 4. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Rangareddy Dir,trict. 5. The Sub-Registrai, Podda Amberpet, Abdullapurmet lVandal, Rangareddy District.

6. One CC to SRI D ANIKETH REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the S tzirie of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] B Two CD Copies .N JP DI HIGH COURT DATED:31 11012025 ORDER , :. t WP.No.29652 ot 2025 ,',,. ^sl 26l't0y M ' 'rr4TCHEo L. \)_ \ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -r. 'r\rf \tril' I