✦ High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025

'1 . Asna Nausheen v. 1. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Sep 2025
Length
1,001 words

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioners request for registration and exercising web options for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota B and C Category in on going or next phase of counselling for the academic year 2025-26 as illegal, arbitrary, un constitutiional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and permit the petitioners for registration and exercising web options for admission into TMBBS/BDS course under Ivlanagement Quota B and C category for the acade.nic year 2025-26 in on going or next phase of counseling. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoLrrt may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners requ{lst for registration and exercising web options under lVlanagement Quota "B&c" category for admission into It/BBS/BDS course in the on-going or next phase cf counselling for the academic year 2025-26, pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ABDUL KABEER Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI R.NAGARJUNA REDDy, Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KALOJI NAGARAYANA RAO UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLI] SRI.II.]S-[ICE P.SAM KOSHY ANI) THE HONOURABLE SRI .IUSTICE SUDDALA CIIAI-APATHI RAO W.l'.No.29957 OF 2025 ORDER, (per [[on hle Sri .Justict' l'..\unt Krt:hv1 [{eard Mr. Abdul Kabccr. lcarncd counscl tbr the petitioners, Mr. R.Nagarjuna Reddy, leai-rred Assistant C'iovernment Pleader for' t{ealth, Medical and l'-anriil We llrrrc [)cparlnrcnt appearing lor respondent No. I and N,lr. T.Sharath, lcarned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana [{ao lJniversitv t,1'{{ealth Sciences appearing fbr respondent No.l ( tbr short 'thc [Jniversitl,')

2. Petitioners scck r:onsidclatirrn of her prayer lbr registration for admission to N,IBBS,'BDS course undel l\lanagemcnt Quota 'B & C' category and participating i:r the orrgoing counselling process lor the academic year 3025-26. '['hey are residents ol Hyderabad and I-atur, Maharashtra. ,A.ccorcling to their rcpresentation, they applied for rcgistration, but was strockcd to kr.tow that a separate registration is reqr.rircd tbr adurission into the said coursc under Managernent Quota 'B & C' category. '[ he datc ol'applications was 2 also over and the wcbsite was closed for registration. Petitioner contends that she was undet' an impression that ,lnlv a sirlgle application firr registration is enough

3. Learned counsel for the pctitioller subntil.s that the respondents n-ra1 be directed to consider the representatiorl of the petitionel in line rvith similar order dated 21.08.1015. passed hy' this Cour1. in other case such as W.P.No.24560 ol l0-l:

4. Learned Standing Clounsel lbr the Llniversity stLbrnits that t[.rc last date of applications for registration has beett closecl and thc LJniversitl'cannot cxtcnd the date. He subrnits that tlrc coLrnscllitlq process has corrmenced since yesterday, after thc issuc' o1-'local candidate' was decided by the Hon'ble Suprcnr,: Cor-r11 vidc .ludgrnent dated 01.09.2025 in Special [-eave [)ctition (C) Nos.2l536-21588 o12024. Therefbre. the Univelsitr rvould not be in a position to entet'tain the petitioner's application ltri lcuistration lol admission to MBBS/BDS Course under Managetlent Quota 'L)' catcgory. It r'vould be a lutile exercisc

5. [Jar,ing rcgard to the atbresaid circumstatrt es nttcl upon consicleration ol ihe subrnission ol [ealned co,-ttrsel lbr thc lrarties, 3 we are of the ",iew that since the admission to MBRS/BI)S course has a definite tirneline required to be adhcred to bl the University and the cut off datcs fbr application or counselling arc sacrosanct, therc is no point ll1 asking the Ljniversit-v to considcr the petitioner's application fbr tresh rcgistration and parricipating in thc ongoing counsclling ior admission to MIIUS/BDS course under Managcmcnt Quota ' B & C' catcgorl . -l'hcrc tbrc. u'c are not inclined to issue any directions to that eI'lirct

6. Accordingly, the Wlit Pctition is dismisscd. -[herc shall be no ordc| as lo costs

7. At this stage, learned counsel lbr thc pctitioner subrlits that in case the date of applications f'or rcgistration to thc abo\e courses IS cxtended, the Univcrsit)' nra)' be dir-ectcd to considcr the application of the pctitioner tbr re-qistration for adrnission to MBBS/BDS Course under Matragement Quota 'B & C' category

8. It goes withotrt saying that in case thc date ol'applications fbr registration to the above courscs is extended, it r'r'ould open tbr the petitioncr to make such an application, rvhic h u'ould be considered by the respondents iu accordance lalr.' "vith 4 Conscqucntlv. tttiscel laneous petitions pend in 1. i l' an-v. shal I stand c loscti sD/-MiJAWAHAR REDOY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER 1 Two CCs to GP FOR |\4EDICAL HEALTH AND FAMIIY WELFARE, High 2. One CC to SRI ABDUL KABEER, Advocate [OPUCI 3. Two CD Copies Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] To A S LS : HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 ORDER WP.No.29957 of 2025 .''..: .r" .. \' a,,l\. , .:, 3 0 [t]T ?$25 :il : )1 .,j.,r' \ +':rl- DISMISSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. I \0 1,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments