The High Court · 2025

2. Smt. Afifa Sultana, Wo. Choudhari Javedakab Nasim, Dio. Younus Ahmed. Age. 28 years, Occupation. Housewife / Student, R/0. H. No. 94-1341N37, Aruna Colony, Tolichowkr, Hyderabad. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be ...Respondent :. pleased to seeking to quash the C.C.N0.10024 of 2OZ2 pcr ding on the file XV Additional chief lvletropolilan Magistrate, Hyderabad agains he petrtioners /A1 - AG for the offences u/s 498-4, 506 lpc, 3 and 4 of Dp Act l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petttron under Section 528 of BNSS praying that , the circumstances stated in the l\ilemorandum of Grounds of criminal petrtron rt Higr court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest appearance of the petrtioners / A1 . AO in pursuance of the C.C.No.1OO24 of 2)'2 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Judicial Metropolitan Magistrate, Nanr.alty At Hyderabad pending disposal of the main Crl.P l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Smt. Afifa Sultana , W/o. Choudhari Javedakab Nasim, t,, r younus Ahmed, Age 28 years, pccupation Housewife / Student, Rio. H I c.9-4_j34tN3i, ' Aruna Colony, Tolichowki. Hyderabad Petitioner/Respondent No.2/ Defacto complainant in l.A.,,t r>s.3 and 4 ot 2O25 AND

1. Choudhari Javad Akab Nasim@Choudhari Javedakab rt rsim S/o. Naseem Choudhari @Nasrm Nizamuddin Choudhari, Age. 35 rears Occupation. Engineer 2 Naseemuddin Nizamuddin Choudhari @ Nasim Nrzamurl rn Croudhari,, S/o Nrzamuddin Choudhari, Age. 70 years, Occupation. Busir t ss. 3. Gosiya Begam Choudhari, @Gausiya Nasim Choudher Wo. Nasimuddin Choudhari @Nasim Nizamuddin Choudhari Age. 55 ,""rs O-irprtion. Housewife 4. Navid Nasimoddin Choudhari @Naveed Nasimuddin Cht rdharr,, S/o. Nasim Nizamuddin Choudhari, Age 4fyears Occupatron. Busrre ;s

5. Sajida Gulfishan Tamkanat_@Tamkanath,, Dlo. Z E) rhr Shaheen, Wo. Naveed Nasim Nizamuddin Choudhari, Age. 40 years, Occ.rpation ffoJsewite '1 to 5 all residents of. Address. R/o. Dukkhi Naqar, Streel t,lo 1, Near Bagwan lvlaslrd. OId Jalna. State. ^/aharashtra

6. Sajjade_Kaniz Fatema @ Kaneez Fatima. Wo. Zill El alrr Shaheen Aoe. 70 years, 9ccupation. Housewife, R/o.H.No 2-1O-1192. Jijan z a Cfrowf< U6nOni Road, Masrat Nagar, Bid. Beed, Maharashtra State ... RespondenUPetitioners/Accused No.1-6 in LA.llrls.3 and 4 of 2025 .1:,=..-,';B 7 The State of Telangana,, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad. ...Respondent in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permil the complainant to compound the offence in C.0 No. 10024 OF 2022 on the file XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered under section 498-4 506 lPC, 3 and 4 of DP against the Petitioner/ Accused Nos.1-6. l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between petitioners and respondent No.2 and quash C.C No 10024 of 2022 pending on the file XV Additional Chief Metropolitan [4agistrate Hyderabad against the petitioners /A1 - ,46 for the offences u/s 498-A, 506 lPC, 3 and 4 of DP Act This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the argumenls of Sri G.DURGA CHARAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1, and of Ms. Syeda Asima Unnisa, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE TTRUMALA Dr:'/t EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL P ETITION No.12664 of 20 25 COMMON ORDER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Co-;1 to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused l'lr s 1 to 6 in C.C.No.10024 of 2022, on the file of the learned XV rdditional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally at Hyderabad, r: listered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-4 and 5() i of l P C and Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act' lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petr ioners/accused

2. Nos l to 6 as well as the learned counset for resp I ldent No'2 that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition t re parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l A Nos 3 and 4 of 2025 have been filed to compound the offences and to re'; rrd compromise between both the Parties. a .J The learned Additional Public Prosecutor I : s ooposed the compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the responde' t No'2 and the petitionersinl.A.Nos.3&4o'(2O2Swhichdisclosexthattheyhave willingly consented for compromise. Since the partie s were willing to 2 Crlp 12664 1025 enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vlde orders dated 25.09.2025 passed by this Court. Thereafter, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 06.1 0.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.10024 of 2022, on the file of learned XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs,5,OO0l \ \ ...s@"*eg// -: ;=: ,// / 3 Crlp l)664 2a)5 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Cou 1 Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a pe riod of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before t re Registry'

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, slr rll stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-M.NAGAMANI IJTANT REGISTRAR ,\ ^qs SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan lvlagistrate at Nanr at y, Hyderabad. 2 The Station House Offrcer, WPS, CCS, DD police Static r Hyclerabad 3. Two CCs to the Publrc Prosecutor, High Court for the Sta e of l elangana at Hyderabad [OUT] I I ,l 4 One CC to SRI G DURGA CHARAN, Advocate [OpUC 5 One CC to Ms SYEDA SATMA UNNIA Advocate [OpUC 6. Two CD Coptes 7 Tne Director Sainik Welfare Hyderabad [OpUC] L The High Court Legatservice Committee,state bf Telang: ra [OpUC] (Along with copy of joint Memo enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs.1O,OO0l ( Rupees Ten thousand on \ ) has been paid by sri G Durga charan, counsel for the petitioner as directed c r the Hon'bre court vide order dated 24. 10 2A25 as Rs.5,0O0l ( Rupees Five th I rsanrl only ) to the "Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and RS.S,OOO/- (Rupees Five th: rsand only ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, vide orr rr rNVl 12575506, dt-1111112025 Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compriar re usR No.127399 of 2025. NVU HIGH COURT DATED:2411012025 (-lU $ /t -.1 //*; .rr \\\ ia) ; ij_ )'\ x- C L!i ) tlliy| *-?' -:a=:=:=:/" COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.3 and 4 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.12664 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION At'tD t.A.Nos.3 AND 4 OF 2025 HIGH COUR-I'FOR THE STATE OI,]TELANGANA AT I{YDERAI}AI) CRL.I).No. ()b 2025 Betq,een: Snrt .,\fifa Sultana. D/o: Younus Ahmccl. Aqc: .3 I years. Occultatiou: I louseu,ile / Stutlent. Rro I l.No. 9-4-1311 N3 ,1 , Aluna Colony, Tol ichowki. Hvilerabad. Petitioncr,' Rcspondcnt No.2/ Dcfzrcto coruplainant. AN]) Choudhari .lavad Akab Nlsirn .rt ( lruudhlrti .lav,.tlakirh Nasirn. S,/o: Nasccnr Clhouclhari Ir? Nasirn N izamuddin Clior-rdhari. Agc. 35 years. Occupation: linginccr, L Nasccmudclin Nizarruddin Choudhari (n-r Nasim Nizarrucld in (lhoudhari. S,, \izarnrrJtlin ( llr)rr(lllilri, Age: 70 years. Occtrpalion: l]usincss, (iosir. a Beganr Choudhari (r?r (iau siya Nasim Clhoudhari, \\. r,: Nusirnutidirr ('ltoLrJhali (2, Nirsirn Nizamuclclin Choudhari, Agc: .55 y.'eals. C)ccr-rpation: llousewilc L Nar rd Nasinroddin Choudhari @ Nuvecd Nasitnucltlin Choudhari, S,'o: Nasinr Nizarntrddin Choudhari. Agc: 4l years. Occupation: Ilusiness -) Sa-lida Gulfishan Tamkanat @)'l'arnkanath. Dlo: 7,ill E,l llahi Shaheen, W/o: Navced Nasim Nizamuddin Choudhari. Aqc: 40 yc2rrs. Occupation: I{ouservife 1 To 5 all rcsidents of : Addrcss: R./o Dukkhi Nagar. Street No. 1, Near Bagrvan Nlasjid, Old Jalna, Maharashtra State.

6. Saj.ladc Kaniz lratcma @ Kancez Fatin.ra. Wo: Zill El Ilahi Shaheen, Age: 70 years, f)ccupa[ion: I{ousewife, R/o. Il.No.2- l0- I I 92. jijarnata Chorvk, -9- Mondha l{oacl. lvlasrat Nagar. Bid. l3ccd. Maharushtra Stati'. 'l he Stltc of I'clanqarrr- l'lrroush S.H O \\rl'S (l(.S I ll,derabad. l{cp. br its- [)ublir: I)ros.'culr,r' lligh (.oLrrt at I I1 tlclirbrLcl. i,:sporrdenL.iI)ctitioncrs,,' ,\ccu scd No. I -6 licspondcnt .IOIN'I' }II'NTO I;ILED I}Y I'III' PETITIONI I.IS,,\NI) I]EFACTO-COMPLAINANT .lhc Putitiorrci antl thc lesponricnt no.2 have iir r calrly settlccl all thcir nrarital drsl'rrrtcs orrt ol'tlre court- All disputc: l.vitlr respcct clivorcc. person.ii ht'lon-qinlts, hoLrscltoltl rtcnrs antl golcl .1r'r eln rtncl lirll alil lln:rl selllcnl.nl rrlc lillr scttlcd. Whcrc as thc child c'r,todJ is also se'ttlctl as pcr llrr .liercr clatctl 1l lch.l()25 passcd by IInd \ lditir',nal [--anrilr corrrt i11 rlct.irbrtl bds.'d ,rn ulc(liatiolr. iVIOtj datcd 2lli.l I 25,cto. l. l'hc pctiti0rtcL tto I agrectl to pal' Ils. 25 l-aklis owards iiril ancl ljnal settlcrn.nt 1o lcsprrndcnt no.l. Out ol rvliich thc p. tiliorrcr no. I has paid Rs. ll l-rrklrs on I0 02-2()15 tirrough D.D bearing. I bs. 014720 & 014721 lor sturr o1'l{s l(l Lakhs and l2 Lakhs drarvn cr-t Hl)|C []ank. .lalna brirnclr. l lut thc bllancc ol lls, j Lakhs is pairl i,r j0-(r7-202i br cash. 'I'hc r.c51.1,1111cnt rro.l ackrrorvletlgcs thc rcccipt ol'tl,e salne. :1. f hc rcsi-.orrtle nt no.2 and tlte pctitioner/Aocusc(l I t.l lo 6 clcclares that lhcr huie no clairrrs a-srrinst cach othcr in lierr ot'tl:c tirll and {inal setl lcDr,]l (

4. fhcrcli're. irt r ieu of thc irbor e. thc Petitioners anc. I)e Lrcto- cornplainan t respcctlr-rll\ suhmit that. tllc above inattcr is seltk r as irrdicatcd in point no- I and tlrat thrs Ilon'blr Court may be pleasecl i I Quesh thc C.C No. 10024 ()lr 2022 on the lilc XV Addl. Chief N4: ropolitan lvlasistrare, Hydcrabacl. re-siste rcd under section 498-A, 506 ll ( l. 3 11 4 of l)I, against the Pctitirrne r,',,\ccLrscd No. I-6 and to pass suclt (.1 )er (,lder or ordcrs as this rxr'hle Court mav rlecur fit and proper in llte circ:rmstanccs of thc cas0. Hyclcraba<l ,9 -10- Datcd: -07-202 5 Petitioncr No. I /Dc-iircto Clomplainant i I I Ilcspondent No.1A I ,u'&er*#-r^ lLespon dent n\ o. f ,i,r\2 0 L,l Rcspondc qqwc4 nr No1l, A I 1u.a-- I(esp, lrr,.t61ir*,,'l + -l [{esp o. -r, 5 ka-^,r_ Respondent No.(r/A6 Counscl tbr the I'c ItoDa i De-lacto Cornplainant 1-s11l1scl lor tlre l(cspon.lcrrls lto 6 Accuscd I to 6 6;r-n C harafl.