The High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTE MPT CASENO :365OF 2023 Petition under Sections 10.and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 197.1 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit tiL trerern the High court may be pleased to punish the Respondent for wirfury anJ deriberatery viorating the orders dated 23.06.2022 passed in W.p.No.ZAAiZZOiz Between: Reddy District.

1. Malchalam Srinivas S/o Afllii"Jl+,5"sioeni . late. Sri. Ramloo, Aqed about 55 years, Occ. oi cnJv'o"dd" Vii;J;, tenamsnaoao Mandar, Ranga 'X;j:iflf IASS,itli"%#f. j&,I1fi lt8;tXt1,$i?j..^i"ffi :i"*3!i; 3 Nilanchalam Uma. Wo.late M. Anjaiah, Aged about 53 years. Occ.Household of chowdersuda viiEod "si,r;;.fiI[Il rvrrno"r. Ransa Reddy Naresh, S/o late M. Anjaiah, Aged about 32 years, Occ (All 1 to 4 are the Resident of Chowderguda Village, Shamshabad fVlandat, - '- .' -v' vvvq v "'!ovs \) Ranga Reddy District) ...petitioners Bi.il*i", 4. lVlanchalam Agriculture. AND i#fff,l:fl :ftffj?:lffL:$or, Ranga Reddv District, Konsarakaran V,rase (Name amended as oer the-Court Order dtd.14 .11.2024 in tA No.2t2O24 in CC No 365 of 2023). ...Respondents t z-w''+ tt lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Between: A3lili'JL',;}"s I l\ralchalam Srinivas S/o.late Sri. Ramloo, Aqed about 55 vears. Occ ideni or c t'*a",gi;o;ViiJii 3'n r.n Manda r. R a n sa ' I{i'iiff ASS,Elli "",'.;Sfd&.I iillli; tX?t i,'# o , xE3 i, * 3!i; Reddy District. "r, "bad .,fr 1, District 4. Manchalam Hs!,::X',ii,''J;i"#:,iffi J'Rll6En$h."f, :B::u'*L?i;i"d;:["J'E::!'i l,l resh, S/o late M. Anjaiah, Aged aboul 32 Tears' Occ ffili?'lt'? ,r,, rhe Resident of chowderguda Village' Shanrshabad Mandal' ilanga Rr:ddY t) strict) ...Petitioners AND SriS.HarshThe]iStrictCollector'RangaReddyDistrictatLzrkdikaDul, Hyderabad. "'ResPondents Petitron rlnder Iiectron 151 CPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in s I pport of tn" p"tiiion, in""ff ign Court may be pleased to direct theresponden.'tot]]<eanimmediateactionbyconsidering|helepresentation made by the petrto,r,rr on oatei. iatottzo22 and o6lo9t2\22 try ,:<tmplying the orders passed n v/F No 26di2 tioiz' ot 23t0612022 in respect of tl'e lands in Sy' Nos 1, 3, 18, '9 2l r :lz anJs}/ r'lo. 23 totally admeasuring 1' 19'": 12 Guntas situated at Chowd:rr;ud, Vifflg", Shamshabad Mandal' R R Dir';trict' pending disposal of the corterrpt petitlon' IA NO: 40F 2023 BETWEEN Sri S. Harsh l) strict Collector' Ranga **o.l.B:il[,:t"erlRespc,ndent in c.c. AND 1 2 4 "r -cr'o*o"is'oJ Malchallm Sr n vas. S/o late Sri Ramloo' Aged abou't t'5- years' Occ- ffi;icrTii;; .;;;i;;i bho*0.|.g'oa Village' s-hamshalrad rvlandal' Ranga Reddy [) tstrt,: Malchalanll\:lgesh.S/olatesri'Ramloo,Ageda.bcultl2years,^Occ. ffi;;rTi;;; i, Jii,"t o1 ReddY I)istt : Manchalam L rrra. W/o late f\il Aniaiah, Aged about 53,ye;ars' r1;-1;s ll6gsghold' 'Shimshabad Mandial' tlanga Reddv - iu;i;;;|i cf District Manchalarrl.aresh,s/olatelvl'Anjaiah'Agedabcul,i\2years,Occ Aoricultlre a:i :"iii; are the Resident of Chowderguda Village' Slramr;habad lvlandal' L 'Responientsr/Pelrtioners in C'C Hanga'1eoil"-o,strrctl vitrase' Slhamshacad tvandal' Ransa t)howdersudu' viiiJg", l Petition under Section 151 cpc praying {hat in tfie circumstances stated in the affidavrr fited in support of .the discharge this respondent from this Cbntempt orders. peiitio;, it" Hift Court may;-G;;;i; oth.; ;;i;;; ".s., inO p."" "r"h IANO:1OF2 o24 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, [r,"-Higt court may be preased to drrect the respondent to cail for the entire records in" fire No. rtitogbrzora rrom tne office of the respondent herein with regard to the land SV No. r , r A, f q Zl iii'iodii -situate-d at Chowderguda village, snamsnaOa j admeasuring Ac. 11 .12 Gts Y'nd.'l' Ranga Reddy District for adjudication ot ihe" conrempt case before this Honble court. Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri. Suresh Shiv Sagar Counsel for the Respondent : AGp for Revenue The Court made the following: ! { . ; ! I I ! HOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY' CONTEMFT CASE No.36s of2023 ORDER: Th s Oc r,tcmpt Case is trled alleging non-ccnlFlie nce of the order, d aterl '-a3 -Cr6 '2022 passed by this Court ir' Wr-il Petition No.2662'.2 of 2(22'

2. This (l( rirt vide order dated 23 '06 '2022 dispcs':d cf the writ petition ,r.,itl.r I he [6][6rving directtons: ftd. respondeit shaLl consider the letter datecl:23')'r'i019 of "(1) The s€ the thtrc' tespondettt addressed to the second- respottdent n File No.D/ 6n.'/. .1019 for cle'nottfgirtg lte subiect lands from tte Pr tlibitory Reg ster t c int.liled rI['ier 'sectron 22 A of the Act' 19()8: atd (2) T<t c t tsi(ler the onlLrte application beaing Nos 22O(t05259O' 22C0O542r8,22A0O544792200051481'220005417(;'220itc54489' 22COAs.',.to.22000514()J)x)\o54492,2200054194',2i\oi',t(54483', 22(OO5'1'tt7.22()OO5448:t)))Ot:)J|488and22000544811:;ubn:ltedbg the petitianers for Lr1tdotrctrt ttf thetr nctnes on Dhar<znt Portll in 'espect oJ the sttLtle )i lands tot(llll (t(Ttttelstlnt LCI Acs 11.12 gt:; o-f )lt'tu dtiguda Villtge, ShztrLslrubad ltl.ln(lol Rat.glct Re'ddy Dstrict and''o'isx"ance of conseqlt? 7 iaL pottQ.l(i p(l'ss book'crrnt tile deeds in tle r ottes of the petitronc,; orrd pass (tPl)roptlr.te orclers itt accordcurce utilh laL'" bA dulg afJ;trditt:] rtn t>pporlrLrtitg of 1tt:rsorrl.L lrcanng to the pettliarLe''s or their rcpresettt..tll)e u)ttlut (1 penod of two montlls: J'ont t'w date of auihon:€a if the second tespontlen comes to re.eipt ()l (t copg of thts ordtr hI 'Qse' thc c(r1cl1si(rtl Llt(Ll the re(flest of the peltoners caur(ft be a.ceded to' tLu sec(tt (' r(lspoi(1crLt slrrlll pass a reasoie(7 order artd cot ntrnj'cctte tlle sa l€ t, lc t4'ltlttt'tP'\ 2

3. The learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue has submitted that in compliance with directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, the t ald Reforms Tribunal_cum_Revenue Divisional Ofhcer, Rajendranagar Division, Ranga Reddy District (for short "the Tribunai".), has passed orders vide proceedings No.Ch/ 253 1, 2596, 2797 / 1g7S dated 27 .O3.2O25. (Land Reforms)

4. A perusal of the proceedings No.Ch/2 S3L, 2596, 2ZgZ /lg1s dated 27.O3.202S passed by the Tribuna-l would reveal that the case Iiled by the Aurhorised Ofhcer & Tahsildar Collectorate, Ranga Reddy District under Rule 16(s)(b) of the Telangana Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Rules, 1974 r/w Order 47 Rule I and 2 r/w Section 114 ofCpC against the orders passed in File No.Ch/2531, 2596, 2TgT /tg7l dated 3O.O1.2024 in respecr of lands in Sy.Nos. 1(2_39), 3(0_19), t8(1_l t), 22(r ot)' 2r(r-29), 23 (2-o7) & 19 (1-26) rotal admeasuring Ac. r l 12 gts situated at Chowerguda Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, was partly allowed directing the Tahsildar, Shamshabacl ro reverr back rhe lands in Sy.Nos. l(2.971, LB(l.2Zl, 22(1.O2), 2llt 72l, 23 (2.17) & 19 (1.65) total admeasuring Ac.lO.82 cents srtuatcd at Chowerguda Village to the petitioner No.1 herein and tr;t.o others and report compliance. I i i I I l i I I I E I ! ! I l '! ! i i i J In vievl of the above, this Court is of the vievr tlLrlt there is no

5. willful or. delilr,:rate intention on the part of the respo erlel ,t to initiate proceedings rnder the provisions of the ContemJrt of 'J:urts Act, t97 r.

6. A:cordirgly, the Contempt Case stands clc'sed I{o'v:ver, if the petition<:rs eu t aggrieved by the orders dated 27 'Oi\ '2t)2:'i passed by the Tribunrrl it is open to them to challenge the :;amr' before the appropriate f,r -um, in accordance u'ith law. Miscel.laneous petitions, if an-u'-, shall stand closerl' ,/TRUE COPY'/ SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DE:PUl;\ REGISTRAR SEC:TION OFFICER To,

1. One C'l to S ri. Suresh Shiv Sagar Advocate [OPUC] 2. fwo635 1() A,GPfor Revenue High Court for the Stai:e of Tr:langana [OUTI 3. Two CD CcrSrtes DUgh ,J .) t . -<:s. .,{ .] \ \( 'l2 I/ 0 3 iilit lB25 OgSprrC\\ - -:z *z 7 HIGH COURT DATED:O4IO4|2O25 ORDER CC.No.365 ol 2O',21 i t I : I : t I i \ I I I l CLOSING THE C.(). t I 1 i r I