✦ High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 25 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
25 Sep 2025
Length
1,215 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29474 OF 202s Between:

1. R.Hemavardhan Reddy, S/o.R.Narayan Reddy, age 65 years 2. Pedda Narsimha, S/o.Chinna Abdulla, age 55 years 3. Boya E. Manyam, S/o.Boya E. Timmanna, age 43 years 4. T. Telugu Kane Narsimulu, S/o.Savaraiah, age 57 years 5. Narsamma, W/o.K.Laxman, age 55 years 6. Chinna Narsimha, S/o.Chinna Abduila, age 49 yeai's 7. Telugu Nakkala Ramulu, S/o.Pedda Abdulla, age 49 yrs 8. Tokala Yellanna, S/o.Bhagavanth, age 59 years 9. Narsimha, S/o.Chinna Abdulla, age 48 years '10. Nagamma, D/o.Balaiah, age 65 years 1 1. Kotha Erra Kistamma, D/o.Peda Masanna, 78 years l2.Janampalli Chinna Kistanna, S/o.Balaiah, age 79 years 13. Tirupathamma, D/o.Naganna, age 32 years 14. Nakkala Naganna, S/o.Giranna, age 53 years Rl/o Kanayapalli Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...PETITIONERS AND 1 2 3 4 A The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary lrrigation and CAD Department, Secretarrat, Saifabad, Hyderabad The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Finance Department Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad The Chief Commissioner Land Acquisition, Nampally, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District. The Special Deputy Collector (LA)/ Land Acquisition Officer, P.J.P. Gadweal now RLISP-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnrti circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more nature of Writ of lr.4andamus declaring the action of the depositing compensation amounts to the petitioners as per . in O.P Nos.101, 90 99, 102,13O,119,123,.188, 137,91, 1:( dated 03-06-2014 and E.P.Nos.i09, 2011, 247, 353,357, 3r) of 2024, 2BB, 291 and 292 of 2025 on the fite of the -: Wanaparthy as modified by this Hon'ble Court in L.A.A.S.Nc. 8-2022, 40-4, 540, 2s6, 363, 170, 388, 224, 360, 542, 1gs, 3( 27 -9-2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300_4 lndia and consequently direct the Respondents No..l to 5 I decreetal amounts to the credit of O.p.Nos.101, 90, 99, 10:l 137,91 ,136, 96 and i24 of 2013 dated 03-06-20.14 r praying that in the High Court may be rarticularly one in the Respondents in not rdgment and Decree , 96 and 124 of 2013 ), 362, 363. 370.374 :nior Civil Judge at 17 of 2016 dated 22- 5, 510 of 2016 dated ,f the Constitution of erein to deposit the 'l 30, 1 19, 123, 188, l,,A NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1S1 CpC praying that in the r;i r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma1 the Respondents No.1 to 5 herein to deposit the decreeta Judgment and decree in O.p.Nos. 405,. 3Zg, 4OO,3g3,4OZ, 3s9, 383, 3B8, 392, 390, 387, 339, 356, 347,413,416.41C, 361, 394. 386, 340, 384, 389, 352,357,370 and 341 of 2C. and E P, 190, 194, 195, 198, 200.2O2.22g,231 ,232of2024 and 335 of 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at \ drsposal of the main writ petition umstances stated in be pleased to d irect tmounts as per the 403 358, 367,345, 391 , 414, 354, 415, 2 dated 03-06-2014 211,290,390, 320 /anaparthy pending Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: AGp FOR lRRl AND COI\I /l AREA DEV Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : AGp FOR FINANCE & f,t ANN|NG !9y1set for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5: SRt SOMU SRtNtV. S REDDY, SC FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29474 of 2025 oRDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader lor Irrigation appearing for respondent No. 1, learned Assistant Gor,ernment for Finance and planning appearing for respondent No.2 and Mr.Somu Srinivas Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos 3 to 5' With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage ilself'

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondent authorities in not depositing the compensation amount to the petitioners as per judgment and decree in O.P.Nos. 10t, 90, 99, lO2, l30, 119, 123, 1BB, 137,91' 136, 96 and 124 of 20 13 dated 03 06'2014 and tr P'Nos IO9 ol 2011, 247, 353, 357, 360, 362, 363, 37O, 374 of 2024; 288' 29t and 292 of 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy and a consequential prayer \vas sought to direct the respondent authorities to deposit the decreetal amounts to the credit of the tr.Ps.

3. Today wl'rcrr thc matter has been taken rp lor hcaring, - learned counsel for the petitioner submits lrat in similar circumstance this Court in W.P.No. i2837 r f 2023 dated

28.O4.2023. perssed tl're lollor,r,ing order:- "5.llauitrry regard to the sa.me, the Wril dtsposed of ond respondent 1fo.5 is dtrectec the decret.al antourtt in ternts of the order t doted 3O.03.2011, passed in O.P.No.65 oJ' . Senior Ciuil Judge, Gadwa| to the credit oj 2O23 in O.P.No.65 of 2OO9 on the file of ' Judge, Caclual, as expeditiously as poss r rote utithin a period of four (4) months fror receipt ol'a copg of this order. There shall be lo co.sts. " pett.trcn ts to deposit n-d decree, )09 by the 7.P.No.5 of :<:nior Ciuil Le, at ang '.he date of to order as 4 . Lcarned co un sel lor the petitioner further p r ty this Court to pass similar orders as passed in W.P.No.1283/ of 2023 dated 2a.o4.2023

5. Leanred counsel appearing for respondenls lid not dispute the samc

6. Rccorcling the submission made by I :rrned counsel appearing orr crther side and in terms of order passed by this Court in W.l).No.12837 of 2023 dated 2a.O4.),O23, this writ petition is disposed of directing the responder- authorities to deposit thc cnhanced compensation in terms ,t the orclcr and decree, passed in O.P.Nos.101,90,99, lO2, 13(r 119, 123, IAa, J |37, gl, 136' 96 arrd 124 of 2013 dated 03'O6'2014 and to the creclit of E.P'Nos'109 of 2011' 247 ' 353' 357' 360' 362' 363' 37O' 374 of 2024; 288' 291 arrd 292 of 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' as expeditiously as possible' at any rate within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a coPY of this order'

7. Aciordingly' this writ petition is disposed of' Miscellaneous applications, if any pending' shail stand ciosed No order as to 'i{1I+XHIHIE,EFRRX / 6 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER secretariat' Saifabad' r,[#*partment Secretariat Buldinss' saifabad' To, , +[: 3[513',"?'rtt'l;tfg '.i1y3:43!o "oo '":un** , l[: 3{I:,8?!:;,ffi:H 3- The Chief Commissioner Land Acquisition' Nampally' Hyderabad' o. an" O,.u'"t Collector' Wanaparthy District' , Hi Rrff Fl, L,EB'JJ'3",lti:,iinl bfllfl "t*'-*n 6. One CC to SRI V MANOHAR RAO' Advocate IOPUCI , :If"?r:;i:"n'o5ff* ranr nuo coMM AREA DEV' Hish court for the state officer P J P Gadwea,

8. Two CD CoPies PVL TKS cdl- I I HIGH COURT DATED:2510912025 npntrD vT\L'L't WP.No.29474 of 2025 R 1HE S 7,. (-) 0 [[8 2026 z * \ * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \'( \^\I'a €

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments