Narsimha Reddy @ A. Narsimha Reddy v. State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, Criminal Petition is disposed off
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 35(3), 528
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ss. 3, 4
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is disposed off Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shrril stand closed. SD/. V KA THA DE:PUTY REGI RAR //TRUE COPY// To '1 . The Junior Crvrl Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First {llass at Kosgi. Narayanpet District. SECTION OFFICER
Judgment
4. Lavanya @ Ivl. Lavanya, Wo M.Srinivas Reddy, aged 38 years, Occ Agriclture R/o Kolluru village Nawabpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar district. 5 Venkat Reddy @ E.Venkat Reddy, Aged about 46 years, occ. Agriculture Rio chinnaummethula Kondurg Manrial, Ranga Reddy district.
6. Srinivas @ M.Srinivas Reddy, S/o lvl. Anantha. Reddy, 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Kolluru Mandal Nawabpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar district. ,..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 6 AND
State of Telangana, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad. .. Respondent
E. Malathi Latha, Wo A.Narsimha Reddy Aged about 25 years, Occ Agricutlure Rio Pothireddy palli, Kosgi Mandal Narayanpet district. ...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the FIR in Crime No. 193 o'f 2024 daled 9-08-2024 on the file of P.S. Kosgi, Narayanapet district against the petitioners/ Accused Nos. I to 6. - l.A. NO: 2 AF 2024 Petition under Section 528 BNSS 2023 praying that !n the circumstances stated in the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in FIR in Crime No 193 of 2024 dated 9-08-2024 on the file of P.S. Kosgi, Narayanapet district pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. ARUN KUMAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri lV. VIVEKANp.NDA REDDY Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and ncre appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE K.SUR.ENDER CRIMINAL PETITIoN No.13216 OF 2o24 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/Al to A6, to quash the FIR in Crime No.193 of 2024, dated.O9.O8.2O24 on the file of Kosgi Police Station, Narayalapet District. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 498-4, 323, 5O4 rlw.34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act
2. On the basis of the complaint of the 2"d respondent, crime was registered against these petitioners who are husband and relatives , I of the 2"a respondent. In the complaint, the allegation of demand of I I additional dowry of Rs.5 lakhs, was made.
learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific allegations are made against A2 to A6.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, was already issued to A1. 2
In the complaint, no specific allegations art: leveled against petitioners 2 to 6/A2 to ,{6 and further petitioners 3 to 6 are living separa te ly.
In the said circumstances, the Investigating Officer shall consider the a bove a spect and take into consideration before frling final report. Further, no coercive steps shall be rzrken against the petitioners/A 1 to ,4.6, pending investigation.
Operative part
Accordingly, Criminal Petition is disposed off Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shrril stand closed. SD/. V KA THA DE:PUTY REGI RAR //TRUE COPY// To '1 . The Junior Crvrl Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First {llass at Kosgi. Narayanpet District. SECTION OFFICER
2. The Statron House Officer, Kosgi Police Station, Narayanapet, Narayanpet District.
3. Trryo CCs to PLrblic Prosecutor, High Court for the State cf Telangana at Hyderabad (OtJT)
4. One CC to SRI c. ARUN KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Turo CD Copies l,s[_ HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.13216 of 2024 ]li lHE S t,t, (' c 11A?B M (( > a o c, t t Dt:strtcpeg {i t)ISI'>OSING Ol IIIl. ( lil I'>I:TITIOr\ I
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, Criminal Petition is disposed off
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 35(3), 528; Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.