High Court · 2025

Hanumakonda District' ...RES''NDENT' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue of a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the Pensionary Benefits of the husband of the Petitioner like Class - IV Final GPF amount of Rs.16,28,4391 as specified in Clause 3(A) (3) in G.O.Rt.No.1097 dated 22.06.2000 as void, illegal, arbitrary and unco nstitutional and contrary to A.P. Revised Pension Rules and violation of Article 300-,4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to release Pensionary Benefits of the husband of the Petitioner like Class - lV Final GPF amount of Rs.16,28,4391 by issuing Revised Authorization for available balance of Rs.16,28,439/- in Class - lV GPF No.020-006-0334 as per Clause 3 (A) (3) in G.O.Rt.No.1097 dated 22.06.2000 by following the orders of Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.22160 of 2024, date '13.08.2024, W.P.No. 27760 of 2024 and W.P.No. 27 837 dated 04.10.2024. IIIEE lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c''(;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m,ri be pleased to direct the Respondents to release Pensionary Benefits of the hu:,band of the Petitioner like Class - lV Final GPF amount of Rs.'16,28,4391 try issuing Revised Authorization for available balance of Rs.'16,28,4391 in Cl,rss - lV GPF No.020- 006-0334 as per Clause 3 (A) (3) in G.O.Rt.No.1097 j3ted 22.06.2000 by following the orders of Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.22160 of i )24, date 13.08.2024, W.P.No. 27760 of 2024 and W.P.No. 27837 dated 04.10.20. 4 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. PRABHAKAR Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER @1'''-* THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK UIRIT PETITION No.29896 oF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is fried under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the foliowing reliet "...to issue atl order or directioft more partianlorlg one in the naturc of WRIT OF decbring the actiofl of the Respondents in not leLeosing the'pensioaary the husbdrui of the Petitioner like CIass-M Firlat GpF .amount if Aengf$ { ^IANDAMUS, Rs.16,2a,439/- as specified in Clduse 3(A)(3) in C.O.Rt.No.1Og7 dated 22.06.2000 as uotd, iltega\ a.bitrary and un@nstitutioftdl aftd contrary to A.p. Revised petlsion Rules and. uialation oI Article 3OO A of th-e Constitution of Iniia and consalrcntlg dtect the Respondents to releasa Pensionary Benefits oJ the husbdnd of the pAitionet tike Class-IV Fin,.I GPF d@ouftt oJ Rs.16,28,439/- b! issuiag Revised AutLlorizatio Jor auallabLe baLan@ of Rs.16,28,439/- ia Class-fv cpF N'.O2O4O6-O334 as per Clause 3 (A)(3) in G.O.Rt-No-1O97 dated 22.06.2000 bg fo owitLg thE orders of Hon;bte Coun itt W.P.N'.2216O of 2024, date 13.08.2024, W.p.No. 27260 of 2024 aftd W.p.No. 27837 dated 04.1A.2O24, and to pass such..."

2. Heard Sri R. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Services-Ill, appearing for the ,respondents. With their consent, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at admission stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner,s husband retired from service on 31.O8.2O2O, attaining the age of superannuation, while working as a Class IV employee, i.e., Cook, at Government S.C. Boys Hostel, Elkathurthy, Hanumakonda District. However, to her misfortune, her husband passed away on O4.O}.2O23, and his pensionar5r beneflts, viz., Class-lV Final GpF amount of Rs.16,28,4391-, were not paid to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner submitted her representation to { I respondent No.3 on 26.O8.2025, ventilating and seeking redressa,l of her grievance. However, no action has been taken thereon so I 2 PK,J Wp 29a96 202s :: r'-l far. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner g -eqys this Court to direct respondent No.3 to consider the repres rrtation of the petitioner dated 26.08.2025, and pass necessary :,.rders within a stipulated perrod of time.

4. l,earned Government Pleader for Services-ll lairly submits that respondent No.3 will consider the represr r:ation of the petitioner dated 26.08.2025, ar.d pass appropl ate orders in accordance with [aw.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by :zrrned counsel for the respective parties, without going into merits ;l'*1s sase, the Writ Petition is clisposed of directing respondent Ir:3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.O8.ill)25, and pass appropriate orders thereon, strictly in accordanc,, with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a pe: ir,d of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of tlLis order, and communicate a copy thereof to the petitioner. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs ..---' \ //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S. PRASAD D'EPUTY REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Deputy Director, Schedule Caste Development D()oilrtment, Government ot I elangana, Hanumakonda Dist. One Two Two C to SRI R. Prabhakar Advocate [OPUC] Qs^to QP For Services lll ,High Cirurt foithe Sta e of Telangana. [OUT] D Copies C C 2 3, 4. MBC BS _ '-'&'-*:;1 1 . .ala.':..:.q.b r-t :,.i..rd{...."*- -- r '' -:-:rtt qrrr-{*-j-.?:t_ " .-:-"-'-18:3 q t HIGH COURT DAT'E|D: 2610912025 7- , i,:1;,- ...... /a /. -1 t"< ti,,:' \' i-.. \ ' r, otT 20fi ..., ORDER WP.No',!29896 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE V\IFIIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS lplu" \)