Mr. Pavan Kumar V Yadavalli, learned couns Mr v. Yadu Krishna Sainath, Iearned cou No

titution of lndia praying that in the herewith, the High Court may be re particularly in the nature of Writ Respondent as illegal , arbitrary, law in passing the impugned order in R.P 48 of 2024 in l.A No 72 of 2024 in CC 17 of 2024, dated.OT-10-2024 and 1 set aside the same and dismiss the l.A No 7 of 2024 in CC 117 ot 2024 on the ----:t ...PETITIONER AND 1 3 4 5 Next spa-ces Eco buird rndia LLp, prot No. 732-4, Ground Froor, e - Hub prot No. 8-2-2931821,\1732. ptot No 732-4 Ground iroor, O HuO ifoaa f.f" g6, Jubliee Hitts Hvcerabad, r9r1sa1Z-so-oo5e"n"pi6.unr"a uy iis-coii rr,lii soha it R/o Kaieir A,4eadows- r, rtii r.,ro. rb r, pr,ii":slkrlrtprrr,v, n va"ir-ori.' The State of Telrnoana Repres€.nted b-y its principal Secretary, Department of civit Suppties rnd consum"; aff;il, -d";;ir;i;i, "ri,/de.abad The Telangana State Consumer .Disputes Redressal Commission, Khairtabad, Hydc,rabad, Rep. by it,s Registrar, District Consunrer Disputes Redressal Commission-lll. Ren Iuperintendent, Chandra Vihar Complex, gth floor, Cundf,I Nampally, Hyderabad. Ga.diraju_Vijaya (rishnam Raju, Flat No 402,Dwarkamay Apartment, I\rlN R College Road, A S Raju NagaiColony, Kukatpiil-y,HyOeraOaO SOOO72. by it's Bhavan, ...RESPONDENTS Petitlon under s ection 1 51 c. pc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in r;upport of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orde- Dt.o4.11.2024 and consequenfly dismiss the writ petition with exemplary costs zrnd orders may be passed accordingry in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PAVAN KUMAR.V.YADAVALLt Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: Gp FOR CIVIL SUppLIES Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRt V.YADU KRTSHNA SATNATH counsel for the Resporrdent No.5: sRr soMASEKHAR RAICHUR (Nor The Court made the following: ORDER 'RESENT) 7/ '1 THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOU AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE BIIATTACIIARYA PRAVEEN KUMAR trIRIT PETITION NO.3 LOg 0F 2024 Mr. Pavan Kumar V Yadavalli, learned couns Mr. V. Yadu Krishna Sainath, Iearned cou No.4 upp.-i.,g for the petitioner "f n$el appearing for the respondenl ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bha Itacharya) 1 . We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing (complainant before the responden lor the respondent No.4 lt No.3/ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-lll, H' [derabad).

2. No one appears for the responde nt No.5.

3. A Co-ordinate Bench passed an interim order dated

04.11.2024 directing the Executrng C f ourt not to proceed further without the leave of this Court

4. We are informed that the e' [idence of the respondenl No.4/complainant has concluded an ld the petitioner is due to commence its evidence before the respondent No.3/ District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commis Hsion-III.

5. We are satisfied that there is no basis to continue the interim order since contrary to th [e submissions made, the petitioner's name rs clearlv reflected in the License Agreement executed between the petitioner an I the respondent No.4 on a O1.I2.2O23. The petitioner,s claim that the Agreement was executed between the respondent No.4 and the respondent No.5 in personai capacit5r is hence contrary to the records. Additionally, the petitioner's case in the FIR contradicts the p()sition taken by the petitioner n the Writ petition.

6. We are, therefore, of the considered vierv that nothing further remains of the writ petition and the pa:ties should be relegated to the District Consumer DisptLtes Rcdressal Commission-Ilt, Hyderabad, where the trial is prescntly ongoing.

7. W.P.No.ito109 of 2024, along with all connected eipplications, is, accordingiy disposed of in terms ol the above. The interim order ,1ated 04.11.2024 is vacated. There shall be no order as to co'sts.

8. Needless to say, the petitioner and.the respondcnt Nos.4 and 5 shall be at'lit,erty to raise all points before the District consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-Ill, Hyderabad. //TRUE COPY// SD/. P. PONNA KRISHNA ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Principal S€ cretary, Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Secretariat, Hyderabad, state of Telangana.

2. The Registrar, Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Khairtabad, Hydr:rabaid.

3. The Superintencent, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-lll Chandra Vihar Ccmplex, 9th floor, Gandhi Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad.

4. One CC to SRI FAVAN KUMAR.V.YADAVALL|, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to SRI V.YADU KRISHNA SAINATH, Advocate IOPUCI A f)no /'f- +a ar2l qnllAqtrt1L{AO Dn l/'-LJl lD /\.1.,^^^+^ r.tDr li.\r 7 o BSR PVL Two CCs to GP FOR CtVtL SUppLtES, at Hyderabad [OUT] High Court for the State of Telangana Two CD Copiesw HIGH COURT DATED: 2210812025 ORDER WP.No.30109 of 2024 /..' ,Z:'..,, (' 5 AUE 206 I l 1) ii"l z \.,o,. \.*- \\r.' DISPOSING OF: THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 8